Ban List for the temporary Belma server

FinMan · Post by **FinMan** » 19 Nov 2008, 20:10

Xiphi i have had same problem many many times in belma. --> whining for the most littlest bad things on levels.

Bosky · Post by **Bosky** » 29 Nov 2008, 23:38

Dont need ban now, i think he want only show, what he can make with elma.exe
Ban only when he will show this few days and playing more balles with this

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 29 Nov 2008, 23:41

should be detectable in teh next version, however i would still give him ban
in the next version any attempt like this would result in the eternal ban

Bismuth · Post by **Bismuth** » 30 Nov 2008, 16:16

I don't think he deserves ban. He's only havin' some fun with elma.exe, but I don't think it is really cheating/annoying. But I would ban him if he continued winning balles that are made for real competition with it.

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 30 Nov 2008, 17:26

it was phun.. until some day. his cheating could be even allowed imo, but he should never ever play on belma with cheated exe, and ofc never upload his cheated times anywhere.
my solution would be: snadle, keep on cheating ur elma.exe and developing ur programming skialz but dont turn it into belma and dont play online with teh cheated.

Bismuth · Post by **Bismuth** » 1 Dec 2008, 00:29

Yeah, I think it's ok that he changes elma.exe for fun and then maybe come in belma to show for some minutes, but not cheat in balles and cheat times with it.

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 1 Dec 2008, 01:07

It's a cheat, ban is overdue, I've been banned for a month for using gravity patch outside of a battle, so what the fuck is the problem here? You might reconsider your odd opinions now, go on, I'm all ear.

Kopaka · Post by **Kopaka** » 1 Dec 2008, 14:15

Indeed, cheat is ban, always. He can always get unbanned later.

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 1 Dec 2008, 17:45

im glad that some serious guys took that cheating seriously and put a ban on snadle, imo he definitely deserves for teh -.-

western · Post by **western** » 10 Dec 2008, 13:37

dame, I didn't know "jew" would still be in use in the 21th century.

totem · Post by **totem** » 10 Dec 2008, 20:45

knew "nigger" is still used by motherfucker assholes

western · Post by **western** » 10 Dec 2008, 20:49

why not add an "auto bad" feature like in trackmania nations?

I mean, when someone gets annoying, press that f9 key, are you sure you want to put up the "ban" pool? press y, then people decide vote yes or no (if they want) by pressing e.g. f1 for yes, f2 for no, and after 60 seconds countdown: 6 on 10 decided to ban kuski7321, so be it (auto ban feature) anyway /2 cents

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 10 Dec 2008, 21:59

that's the most idiotic thing i've ever heard.

FinMan · Post by **FinMan** » 10 Dec 2008, 22:05

Lukazz wrote:that's the most idiotic thing i've ever heard.

agree... Theres just that little community, if we do that, easy to kick someone out for fun. and then its 1/100 of active players out.

No, not good.

western · Post by **western** » 11 Dec 2008, 01:27

I'm not sure you got what I said. anyway.

and Lukazz, would you please stop with these kind of comments?
it's not that I keep a log of negative comments directed at me, but I have the feeling that 5/6 comes from you...

zebra · Post by **zebra** » 11 Dec 2008, 09:21

I think western's idea is good. If 60% of people agreed that a player should be banned, then he definately deserves his ban. The ban could be something like a day or a week, not longer.

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 11 Dec 2008, 09:29

maybe, though i do think people will be spamming bans 24/7

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 11 Dec 2008, 12:00

Igge wrote:maybe, though i do think people will be spamming bans 24/7

ye, and if there are let's say, jaytea, zweq and 8 bloody n00bs. the nabs will ban them because they are annoyed because always the same dudes win the level. total newbies just shouldn't be allowed to vote.

zebra · Post by **zebra** » 11 Dec 2008, 12:55

At least in trackmania that isn't a problem. Someone sometimes makes a ban vote but i have never seen such a vote to pass. If someone tried to ban zweq, it would really need 60 % of the people to say 'yes'. I guess there are always more than half of the people who are sane and would vote 'no'. Instead, I think, it could result in a ban for the guy who started vote against zweq.

But in trackmania there are much votes like 'go to next challenge' and 'restart challenge' which usually pass.

Trust me, this voting system is pretty good and would work. You wouldn't always need an admin to for example abort a battle.

Admins would always have a possibility to reject/accept a vote instantly.

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 11 Dec 2008, 13:37

not sure about that, there is a huge bunch of ppl that arent in lauta, on irc or russian community

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 11 Dec 2008, 21:33

maybe its nat the most stupid thing ive ever heard, but seems a bit stupid. i will tell ya why. on belma there are always some nabs who wanna make fun out of serious players and the whole community. they would ex. start a vote to ban zweq, other nabs would 'yes' cuz they think baning zweq would be phunny, some serious players wouldnt vote cuz they simply dont care about such things, and after all zweq could be banned. stupid.

western · Post by **western** » 11 Dec 2008, 22:13

yep. but reassure yourselves! the idea doesn't not come from me.
too, when I first saw it, I've felt dubious. but, hey! it worked well

p.s. here I'm talking about trackmania nations... huge community, alot of n00bs...

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 11 Dec 2008, 22:33

hmm, if u say so

i guess some trial period could be started, if worked, would stay, if nat, would nat.

western · Post by **western** » 11 Dec 2008, 23:11

yea but, don't trust me on anything I say, either. best way to see is to try it out yourself ;)

Post by **SveinR** » 12 Dec 2008, 00:25

No reason to implement something that isn't really needed.

Xiphias · Post by **Xiphias** » 12 Dec 2008, 03:06

haven't read all the posts.. orkade.. but I can say this:

No need to implement any vote ban feat. Alot easier if the banning votes are all offline or some where else. Then there's no fuzz about misuse.

Hail Jappe for ban mod! .P

zebra · Post by **zebra** » 12 Dec 2008, 13:47

you are so negative and don't trust ppl

western · Post by **western** » 12 Dec 2008, 16:00

SveinR wrote:No reason to implement something that isn't really needed.

of course there is "no reason to implement something that isn't really needed."
then I think the question that should be asked is: "is the feature really needed?"

Post by **SveinR** » 12 Dec 2008, 16:35

western wrote:then I think the question that should be asked is: "is the feature really needed?"

No.

Orcc · Post by **Orcc** » 12 Dec 2008, 23:42

Mute zelter for excessive use of German language k10x

Bismuth · Post by **Bismuth** » 13 Dec 2008, 05:07

SveinR wrote:
western wrote:then I think the question that should be asked is: "is the feature really needed?"
No.

Your reply was straight and direct, made me giggle a little.

I think ban vote would be good if there was always at least 15 players active, but sometimes I play at midnight (5:00-7:00 in most of the Europe) and I'm the only active player in the whole wide world, so ez 2/3 vote by nabs...

western · Post by **western** » 13 Dec 2008, 10:31

Bismuth wrote:ez 2/3 vote by nabs...

like I said, I am astonished that in trackmania, the most spammer-annoying person on the planet rarely gets banned. to the point it gets such annoying, then you cast vote pool, only to find out to 80% of peepz voted no to ban. so yes, overall, the feature may not work: nobody ends up getting banned.

zelter · Post by **zelter** » 13 Dec 2008, 17:19

Jappe wrote:
Orcc wrote:Mute zelter for excessive use of German language k10x
yup him and elrondbong speak german all the time, fucking morons

lol ... i wouldn't even care if you ban me!!

+ i remember the times when Jappe aborted battles without any reason just because he didn't liked the balle-starter...

fuckin nazi!

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 13 Dec 2008, 20:39

dame! is he banned?

Sla · Post by **Sla** » 14 Dec 2008, 00:05

Of course he is banned. And be carefull because 15 years old mongos like you will be banned in next days.

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 14 Dec 2008, 00:07

why? because you say so? oh

Grace · Post by **Grace** » 14 Dec 2008, 00:58

some asshole least night was speaking Hungarian, and even when we told him to stop like 8 times (me and Jappe) he kept going.

V1KTOR[HUN]

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 14 Dec 2008, 10:49

well, i would't listen to jappe either.

Bismuth · Post by **Bismuth** » 14 Dec 2008, 19:21

yeah, and before that he was yelling "SHUT A FUCK UP" and "NOOBS" for 10-15 mins...

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 15 Dec 2008, 12:48

shut a fuck up ;DDDDDDDD why dont you just go to a hell

Bismuth · Post by **Bismuth** » 16 Dec 2008, 08:12

Come on, it's true, he was yelling "Shut A fuck up", yes.

zworqy · Post by **zworqy** » 14 Jan 2009, 23:47

New: Xiphias
Reasons: Mongoing and by own request

Sla · Post by **Sla** » 15 Jan 2009, 03:38

You must feel real desire of leaving belma xip, you do not win anything with this type of things. Accept it, you play elma nolifor!!

FinMan · Post by **FinMan** » 15 Jan 2009, 11:17

gz Xiphi

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 15 Jan 2009, 11:19

Seriously. I played some belma today, and I noticed it would be so much bettre without people. Can't you like ban everyone?

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 15 Jan 2009, 18:21

Xiphias wrote:I can't get ban!

zworqy wrote:New: Xiphias
Reasons: Mongoing and by own request

gz

Igge wrote:Seriously. I played some belma today, and I noticed it would be so much bettre without people. Can't you like ban everyone?

ez 'play off-line'

FinMan · Post by **FinMan** » 16 Jan 2009, 08:05

Pawq: diy

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 17 Jan 2009, 21:06

I suggest to ban, or rather warn Rust, because of permanent spamming in russian, sending empty messages, flinging insults at everybody etc. even despite being warned by barre and few other guys, i think some can confirm.

FinMan · Post by **FinMan** » 18 Jan 2009, 12:02

Pawq wrote:I suggest to ban, or rather warn Rust, because of permanent spamming in russian, sending empty messages, flinging insults at everybody etc. even despite being warned by barre and few other guys, i think some can confirm.

Agree. I confirm it. Everyone keeps saying that he would stop speaking russia with his friends etc.. But he just continues the bangoing.

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 22 Jan 2009, 17:45

ban this torrents.ru idiot, starts OLP levels all the time and never ever played a balle imho