How many WRS would you've had on table 100
Moderator: Moporators
- Grace
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4848
- Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
- Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.
Re: How many WRS would you've had on table 100
Shelf life, Uphill Battle, Twin Peaks.
Shadows on Hooked and Warm up.
Shadows on Hooked and Warm up.
Cyberscore!
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
Re: How many WRS would you've had on table 100
how many on 200th?
Re: How many WRS would you've had on table 100
How many on table 400?
if you say 54 you're gay
if you say 54 you're gay
John: lol hittade ett popcorn i naveln
(19:52:06) (@Madnezz) The Golden Apple Award goes to.....
(19:52:36) (@Madnezz) ib9814.lev by igge!!!
(19:52:06) (@Madnezz) The Golden Apple Award goes to.....
(19:52:36) (@Madnezz) ib9814.lev by igge!!!
Zweq wrote:99.9999% of nabs haven't even opened the book yet and most of those that have are still on the first pages
Re: How many WRS would you've had on table 100
38 on 100
12 on 200
0 on 300
12 on 200
0 on 300
Religious Man
|| TT: 37:47:70 || EX New Wave WR + Animal Farm WR || 24 Canadian Records || TEC Bronze Medal || HHIT in the 37min club || http://elastomaster.tripod.com/ ||
|| TT: 37:47:70 || EX New Wave WR + Animal Farm WR || 24 Canadian Records || TEC Bronze Medal || HHIT in the 37min club || http://elastomaster.tripod.com/ ||
Re: How many WRS would you've had on table 100
wu
twin peaks
oau
uphill balle
tag
steppes
new wave
slalom
quick round
shelf life
animal farm
curvaceous
haircut
13 in total
twin peaks
oau
uphill balle
tag
steppes
new wave
slalom
quick round
shelf life
animal farm
curvaceous
haircut
13 in total
"It's good to be having fun, but it'd be funnier to be good"
- Morgan
- 36mins club
- Posts: 582
- Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 22:55
- Team: SPEED
- Location: Lębork, Poland
- Contact:
Re: How many WRS would you've had on table 100
missing ints: 04, 18, 29, 30, 34, 41, 42, 45, 51
so 54-9 = 45 WRs
so 54-9 = 45 WRs
Re: How many WRS would you've had on table 100
wow I had more than I expected: 24.
Re:
2, 3, 5, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 26, 31, 38, 41, 43, 46, 54Labs wrote:1 (Animal Farm)
So it's: 19
Re: How many WRS would you've had on table 100
50. missing 6, 27, 32 and 46Lee wrote:apparently i have 27. i might get back to playing internals soon.
Re: How many WRS would you've had on table 100
54. Those four levs were super easy actually.Lee wrote:50. missing 6, 27, 32 and 46Lee wrote:apparently i have 27. i might get back to playing internals soon.
Re: How many WRS would you've had on table 100
missing: 06, 13, 15, 24, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33, 38, 46, 48, 49, 50, 54.
= wr on 39 levs.
= wr on 39 levs.
Re: How many WRS would you've had on table 100
8 today, 54 tomorrow I guess...Mats wrote:1
Re: How many WRS would you've had on table 100
1, 3, 5;
So, only 3 atm. but like 5 wrs are very close now.
So, only 3 atm. but like 5 wrs are very close now.
Re: How many WRS would you've had on table 100
Code: Select all
# 1: 54
# 2: 54
# 3: 54
# 4: 54
# 5: 54
# 6: 54
# 7: 54
# 8: 54
# 9: 54
# 10: 54
# 11: 54
# 12: 54
# 13: 54
# 14: 54
# 15: 54
# 16: 54
# 17: 54
# 18: 54
# 19: 54
# 20: 54
# 21: 54
# 22: 54
# 23: 54
# 24: 54
# 25: 54
# 26: 54
# 27: 54
# 28: 54
# 29: 54
# 30: 54
# 31: 54
# 32: 54
# 33: 54
# 34: 54
# 35: 54
# 36: 54
# 37: 54
# 38: 54
# 39: 54
# 40: 54
# 41: 54
# 42: 54
# 43: 54
# 44: 54
# 45: 54
# 46: 54
# 47: 54
# 48: 54
# 49: 54
# 50: 54
# 51: 54
# 52: 54
# 53: 54
# 54: 54
# 55: 54
# 56: 54
# 57: 54
# 58: 54
# 59: 54
# 60: 54
# 61: 54
# 62: 54
# 63: 54
# 64: 54
# 65: 54
# 66: 54
# 67: 54
# 68: 54
# 69: 54
# 70: 54
# 71: 54
# 72: 54
# 73: 54
# 74: 54
# 75: 54
# 76: 54
# 77: 54
# 78: 54
# 79: 54
# 80: 54
# 81: 54
# 82: 54
# 83: 54
# 84: 54
# 85: 54
# 86: 54
# 87: 54
# 88: 54
# 89: 54
# 90: 54
# 91: 54
# 92: 54
# 93: 54
# 94: 54
# 95: 54
# 96: 54
# 97: 54
# 98: 54
# 99: 54
#100: 54
#101: 54
#102: 54
#103: 54
#104: 54
#105: 54
#106: 54
#107: 54
#108: 54
#109: 54
#110: 54
#111: 54
#112: 54
#113: 54
#114: 54
#115: 54
#116: 54
#117: 54
#118: 54
#119: 54
#120: 54
#121: 54
#122: 54
#123: 54
#124: 54
#125: 54
#126: 54
#127: 54
#128: 54
#129: 54
#130: 54
#131: 54
#132: 54
#133: 53
#134: 53
#135: 53
#136: 53
#137: 52
#138: 52
#139: 52
#140: 52
#141: 52
#142: 52
#143: 52
#144: 52
#145: 52
#146: 51
#147: 51
#148: 51
#149: 51
#150: 51
#151: 51
#152: 51
#153: 51
#154: 51
#155: 51
#156: 51
#157: 51
#158: 51
#159: 51
#160: 51
#161: 50
#162: 50
#163: 50
#164: 50
#165: 50
#166: 50
#167: 50
#168: 50
#169: 50
#170: 50
#171: 50
#172: 50
#173: 50
#174: 49
#175: 49
#176: 49
#177: 49
#178: 49
#179: 49
#180: 49
#181: 49
#182: 49
#183: 48
#184: 47
#185: 47
#186: 47
#187: 46
#188: 46
#189: 46
#190: 46
#191: 46
#192: 46
#193: 46
#194: 46
#195: 46
#196: 46
#197: 46
#198: 46
#199: 46
#200: 46
#201: 46
#202: 46
#203: 46
#204: 46
#205: 46
#206: 46
#207: 46
#208: 46
#209: 46
#210: 46
#211: 46
#212: 46
#213: 46
#214: 46
#215: 46
#216: 46
#217: 46
#218: 46
#219: 46
#220: 46
#221: 46
#222: 46
#223: 46
#224: 45
#225: 44
#226: 44
#227: 44
#228: 44
#229: 44
#230: 44
#231: 44
#232: 44
#233: 44
#234: 43
#235: 43
#236: 43
#237: 43
#238: 43
#239: 43
#240: 43
#241: 43
#242: 43
#243: 43
#244: 43
#245: 43
#246: 43
#247: 43
#248: 43
#249: 42
#250: 42
#251: 42
#252: 42
#253: 41
#254: 41
#255: 41
#256: 40
#257: 40
#258: 40
#259: 40
#260: 40
#261: 40
#262: 40
#263: 39
#264: 14
#265: 38
#266: 38
#267: 38
#268: 38
#269: 37
#270: 37
#271: 37
#272: 37
#273: 37
#274: 37
#275: 37
#276: 37
#277: 37
#278: 37
#279: 37
#280: 35
#281: 35
#282: 35
#283: 35
#284: 35
#285: 35
#286: 35
#287: 35
#288: 35
#289: 34
#290: 34
#291: 34
#292: 34
#293: 34
#294: 34
#295: 34
#296: 32
#297: 30
#298: 30
#299: 29
#300: 28
#301: 28
#302: 27
#303: 27
#304: 27
#305: 27
#306: 25
#307: 25
#308: 25
#309: 25
#310: 25
#311: 25
#312: 25
#313: 25
#314: 25
#315: 25
#316: 25
#317: 25
#318: 24
#319: 24
#320: 23
#321: 23
#322: 23
#323: 22
#324: 22
#325: 22
#326: 21
#327: 21
#328: 21
#329: 20
#330: 20
#331: 20
#332: 20
#333: 18
#334: 18
#335: 18
#336: 18
#337: 18
#338: 18
#339: 17
#340: 16
#341: 16
#342: 16
#343: 16
#344: 16
#345: 16
#346: 16
#347: 16
#348: 15
#349: 15
#350: 14
#351: 14
#352: 14
#353: 14
#354: 14
- Grace
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4848
- Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
- Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.
Re: How many WRS would you've had on table 100
02, 03, 05, 21, 23, 27, 32, 39, 43, 44, 52
2 Shadows (01, 53)
So that's 11 + 2 = 13.
2 Shadows (01, 53)
So that's 11 + 2 = 13.
Cyberscore!
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
Re: How many WRS would you've had on table 100
nice mathsHaruhi wrote:11 + 2 = 13.
Team TR
Multi WR in Labyrinth with GRob
Best Internal Total Times, Pipe stats & Pipe archive
World kuski map, World Cup stats
- Boomer
- 39mins club
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: 10 Dec 2003, 16:31
- Team: LOS
- Location: Visby, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: How many WRS would you've had on table 100
10
Team LOS website
<jaytea> uh milk was invented in 1966
-
<teh_mila> bah, fucked up nice labpro ride cause i almost fell of the chair:)
<jaytea> uh milk was invented in 1966
-
<teh_mila> bah, fucked up nice labpro ride cause i almost fell of the chair:)