Should WRs and WR TT show 3 decimals?

Mawane · Post by **Mawane** » 7 Apr 2009, 23:38

since WRs have replays involved, it is possible to know EXACT time of replay
Should WRs and WR TT show 3 decimals?

Xiphias · Post by **Xiphias** » 7 Apr 2009, 23:43

no

old discussion.. there was already drawn to conclusion that NAY is the answer

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 8 Apr 2009, 08:58

not necessary yet, WRs are not very hoyled. maybe in some years.

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 8 Apr 2009, 09:33

Well, imho they should, very much! For example John's WR in What the Heck is 38,12x (x>0), but atm the fastest replay is his 38,120.

_FreaK_ · Post by **_FreaK_** » 5 May 2009, 11:30

there ya go

Kazan's WR on uphill AFAIK is already equaled by jarkko...
so having the time shown in 3 decimals would be more precise ... in this particular case.

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 5 May 2009, 11:33

Still, it doesn't seem necessary to have 3rd decimal, just make a better time.

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 5 May 2009, 11:56

but look guys, ive noticed another obstacle, WRs are not times of replays, but times generated to state.dat.... how will you take 3rd decimal out of state.dat? prolly impsy... and taking WRs from replays would be max hard... first of all you would have to save all recs close to pr, secondary it would revolutionize even current table.

and freak, how do you know that its faster, do you hav kazans rec? :O

Grace · Post by **Grace** » 5 May 2009, 12:45

it's not faster, he said equaled.

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 5 May 2009, 12:48

obviously, sorry

Should WRs and WR TT show 3 decimals?

Should WRs and WR TT show 3 decimals?

Re: Should WRs and WR TT show 3 decimals?

Re: Should WRs and WR TT show 3 decimals?

Re: Should WRs and WR TT show 3 decimals?

Re: Should WRs and WR TT show 3 decimals?

Re: Should WRs and WR TT show 3 decimals?

Re: Should WRs and WR TT show 3 decimals?

Re: Should WRs and WR TT show 3 decimals?

Re: Should WRs and WR TT show 3 decimals?