WR replays

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 20 May 2002, 17:23

What do you think, should be WR replays public?

dz · Post by dz » 20 May 2002, 17:25

i cant vote.. ?

Post by **Abula** » 20 May 2002, 17:27

What a surprise no one reading announcements

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 20 May 2002, 17:28

i didn't:)

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 20 May 2002, 17:29

can I vote, pleaaassseeee....

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 20 May 2002, 17:32

I saw you clicking dz, you clicked nooooooo
I'am for it, it would cause faster improving of WRs
and no-team players would be able to beat them...

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 20 May 2002, 17:34

Abula,
when I was trying to create this poll, when i clicked add option without writing an option, it crashed...(Explorer)

dz · Post by dz » 20 May 2002, 17:38

i thought something like that abula but i thought they are not shown before u accept them. of course ive read announcements :)

dz · Post by dz » 20 May 2002, 17:39

i voted no :)

ribot · Post by **ribot** » 20 May 2002, 17:53

it's so sweet to have a poll which u cant vote in . what's the purpose of this ?

DYW265 · Post by **DYW265** » 20 May 2002, 19:09

if everybody could create there own polls the board would be very messy with shitty polls.

Jalli · Post by **Jalli** » 20 May 2002, 19:12

I think only the former WR should be published.

Post by **Abula** » 20 May 2002, 19:25

ribot wrote:it's so sweet to have a poll which u cant vote in . what's the purpose of this ?

The polls can be voted after administrator's acception because of .. well, DYW265 already told it.

Ramone · Post by **Ramone** » 5 Jun 2002, 11:15

Why should they be published? That only means that it would all be about hoyla, of course you could take a new record with a different style, but then the DieHard-Hoylas would beat it right away, and that would ruin the whole idea about elma, of course replay-sections should be avilable, but why "force" anyone to publish recÂ´s? I am pesonally not a crazy hoyla, and I donÂ´t believe I have the skills to take those kind of records... so this would just ruin the fun for me... also the rush when you see a kickass ride would dissapear if youÂ´ve seen all wr-styles...

I think I forgot what I was about to say....

TomCat · Post by **TomCat** » 2 Jul 2002, 18:09

It would be bad to publish them cos than all you would have to do is hÃ¶yling. Everbody would know all good styles, it wouldnt matter to find a new style, cos at the next table you would loose it, because of some kuskis who can play 7-8 hours a day.

Now the only true achivement to invent something new, if you do it, you will have your wr for a long time. But if you publish it, you WILL loose it very soon

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 2 Jul 2002, 21:23

TomCat wrote:It would be bad to publish them cos than all you would have to do is hÃ¶yling. Everbody would know all good styles, it wouldnt matter to find a new style, cos at the next table you would loose it, because of some kuskis who can play 7-8 hours a day.

Now the only true achivement to invent something new, if you do it, you will have your wr for a long time. But if you publish it, you WILL loose it very soon

i wonder why i didn't
i copied it to everybody who wanted (not to you

)
maybe i will

dz · Post by dz » 2 Jul 2002, 21:27

milagros wrote:
TomCat wrote:It would be bad to publish them cos than all you would have to do is hÃ¶yling. Everbody would know all good styles, it wouldnt matter to find a new style, cos at the next table you would loose it, because of some kuskis who can play 7-8 hours a day.

Now the only true achivement to invent something new, if you do it, you will have your wr for a long time. But if you publish it, you WILL loose it very soon
i wonder why i didn't
i copied it to everybody who wanted (not to you )
maybe i will

I guess you belong to the group hoyling 7-8 hours a day

Ky.Jelly · Post by **Ky.Jelly** » 3 Jul 2002, 12:53

i think that old styles should be published so people like me that arnt very good can try new stuff
and try and compete against old record times

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 3 Jul 2002, 17:08

you are wrong, dz
my first succesful finish with current WR style was 12.44
best except me is 12.46 made by TomCat
12.37 and 12.34 were hoyled but which WRs weren't

i didn't play elma last weeks much, i'm sitting 8 hours/day in front of the computer at work and that's enough for me...

TomCat · Post by **TomCat** » 3 Jul 2002, 17:40

Well i dont think i have time to hÃ¶yl 7-8 hours, nowdays like 2 or 3 if i have a good day. However, i think it takes quite much hours to get such a good total

I didnt play much freefall, but enough. It was like 3-4 hours at all, and i was trying to finish it with a not-that-good style. I got 14:04 with it, than i tried the good style, and made 12:46 very soon.
I thought someone will beat it with lots of hundreds so i didnt continued it. My 3rd time is 15:44

And about old times, i dont know what to do..
They should be published, if the wr-style is different, or the style is well known.

dz · Post by dz » 3 Jul 2002, 20:24

they should be published, if the owner of the rec allows it

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 3 Jul 2002, 20:55

hey TomCat, what's not-so-good style on ff?
i haven't done any worse that 13.1x (same with bad landing)
i would like to see dd's 15.25
that's surely cool
also dz's old tricks, umiz's labyrinth, joni's upsidedown...and so on

TomCat · Post by **TomCat** » 4 Jul 2002, 17:20

The not-so-good style is to do two volts at the beginning. Its easier to jump to the next polygon, but of course it is a lot slower. I just tried it before trying the good style, just to practice the style at the end, cos with it, i could get there every time
Im intrested in dd's rec, i wonder how he did it..

I completly agree with dz about the publishing

And umiz's laby?? Why? What time?

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 4 Jul 2002, 21:14

i used that not-so-good style in 12.97 WR
was 13.66/13.82 WR made with same style?
i simply can't imagine, how did AAL do it, 'cause csybe said in the interview, it's the best rec (that means that it wasn't 12.97 style)

ribot · Post by **ribot** » 5 Jul 2002, 08:58

well milagros we could trade aal's style against your wr

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 5 Jul 2002, 11:19

i don't care
i've send my wr to atleast 50 people (many much better than me)
my mail is very_big_psycho@hotmail.com

is AAL still playing?

dz · Post by dz » 5 Jul 2002, 17:15

who cares, ur a very big psycho

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 5 Jul 2002, 20:12

right

Ky.Jelly · Post by **Ky.Jelly** » 7 Jul 2002, 09:48

i only object if only a few people have the rec and are using it to help there times.
once many people have it i think that it should be available to all

[Bob] · Post by **[Bob]** » 23 Sep 2002, 15:51

This poll has no sense because only a few people have wr and the other kuskis want to deceide about the recs that are not belong to them.

Anyway i wouldnt send my rec if i knew that would be published. I think im not alone. Trust px and abula and leave the recs alone, hoyl more

Post by **Abula** » 6 Nov 2002, 02:00

At least some of the former WRs are available to download on Moposite >>

petsen · Post by **petsen** » 1 Feb 2003, 19:45

I think its fine as it is now, former wrs only if the owner gives his permission

magicman · Post by **magicman** » 1 Feb 2003, 23:13

HELL NO ok

then just the hÃ¶ylas can get the wrs'

freak · Post by **freak** » 14 Nov 2003, 11:46

magicman wrote:HELL NO ok

then just the hÃ¶ylas can get the wrs'

It could be but there's another important thing -> what about finding new styles?

Publishing reps opens new ways to find another styles...

WHO CARES WHO THE RECORDS BELONGS TO?!?

Its very impressive to have 40 of 54 WRs but WHO CARES?? Not me.

Most important is -->> WHERE'S THE LIMIT OF EACH TRACK <<--

And kusky's who publishing their WR reps are MENS WITH BALLS!

8-ball · Post by **8-ball** » 15 Nov 2003, 14:33

hmm.... I agree

Ramone · Post by **Ramone** » 16 Nov 2003, 14:09

I dont agree at all. Why should the maxximum limit only matter?

freak · Post by **freak** » 22 Nov 2003, 23:04

what else? tell me please!

Xiphias · Post by **Xiphias** » 13 Apr 2005, 17:17

Well don't need the WR replays... one that has same style should be good enough.

Crypt · Post by **Crypt** » 27 Apr 2005, 04:27

nat need them, too hard styles

Raven · Post by **Raven** » 31 Jul 2005, 04:38

HELL NO

dz · Post by dz » 31 Jul 2005, 07:13

Raven wrote:HELL NO

Well, you know, why?

crazyevildude · Post by **crazyevildude** » 31 Jul 2005, 13:42

I think the recs should be published, but only after a certain period of time. When people invent a new style(although this doesn't happen terribly often anymore) they often get a WR but then hoyl that time down even further, and so it's only fair that they are given a chance to do that.
But after say a period of 4 weeks(?) of no new improvements the rec should be published to help encourage more world records. 4 weeks is long enough to hold a WR, stop being greedy

.

Even if new styles haven't been found, the rec might inspire people to try and beat it, on levels that they might not of thought about playing recently.

Dynamo · Post by **Dynamo** » 31 Jul 2005, 15:26

I voted only former wrs cuz it should be up to the record holders choice to show the rec

thats like saying the answer to some sick magic trick and the magician doesnt even have a say in it...kinda even like copyright laws

John · Post by **John** » 31 Jul 2005, 16:10

Dynamo wrote:I voted only former wrs cuz it should be up to the record holders choice to show the rec

thats like saying the answer to some sick magic trick and the magician doesnt even have a say in it...kinda even like copyright laws

kinda agree with that..

jaytea · Post by **jaytea** » 31 Jul 2005, 17:53

imo its up to the person who rode it all the way, ex wr or not, since altho his ride was beaten.. it may be a secret style shared only by them and the new wr holder

but if the guy were to leave the scene id leave it up to pexi. far too mysterious to have a clÃ¤z rec that will never be seen

Raven · Post by **Raven** » 31 Jul 2005, 20:00

dz wrote:
Raven wrote:HELL NO
Well, you know, why?

Dunno, i voted that for sum month ago, then wr's gonna be so faking hard to beat

Napoleon · Post by **Napoleon** » 1 Aug 2005, 00:20

share em all!

dz · Post by dz » 1 Aug 2005, 04:47

crazyevildude wrote: But after say a period of 4 weeks(?) of no new improvements the rec should be published to help encourage more world records.

I know, let's make it so that only wr holders gets to see other wr recs. That way they would get encouraged to improve them even more!

crazyevildude · Post by **crazyevildude** » 1 Aug 2005, 12:14

dz wrote:
crazyevildude wrote: But after say a period of 4 weeks(?) of no new improvements the rec should be published to help encourage more world records.
I know, let's make it so that only wr holders gets to see other wr recs. That way they would get encouraged to improve them even more!

Umm....Ok

.

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 2 Sep 2005, 07:34

dz wrote:
crazyevildude wrote: But after say a period of 4 weeks(?) of no new improvements the rec should be published to help encourage more world records.
I know, let's make it so that only wr holders gets to see other wr recs. That way they would get encouraged to improve them even more!

ok let me have that one wr for a long time

WR replays

Public WRs?

WR replays

Recs...