When will the WR TT be under 35?!

[Juski]

- 45 Minutes: KingKong, 11 Mar 2000
- 44 Minutes: Champi0N, 5 Apr 2000
- 43 Minutes: KingKong, 4 Jun 2000
- 42 Minutes: zyntifox, 21 Nov 2000
- 41 Minutes: pajen, 14 Oct 2001
- 40 Minutes: dz, 2 May 2002
- 39 Minutes: TorInge, 11 April 2003
- 38 Minutes: Zweq, 28 Sep 2003
- 37 Minutes: TorInge, 16 Mar 2005
EDIT:MISTAKE:- 36 Minutes: John, 15 Jun 2007
Should have put dates of when wr tt went under the limits instead :x

Everytime this question comes up most people always say "Impsy under next minute limit". Few people, including me, have always said ez possible. Even now i still think it is possible, but as we see above it will take longer and longer for each limit we brake. And in 4 years who knows what will be of the scene, this is the first time i doubt next limit actuly will be broken, although still highly possible.

So what do you think? How long until we get under 35 min? Will we get under 35 min?

[Zweq]

already said in other thread that it's useless to think too far because all the guesses you get are "impossible lol nab juski".

it wont happen, not because it isn't possible, but because 2 active internalists cant do it

[John]

didnt know i was under 36

[Marvin]

didnt know i was under 36

But apparently you are. Congratulations!

[teajay]

Wow, John, well done.

[jaytea]

rofl, juski i wonder what you think those limits/players mean

[Memphis]

congratz Johnny! you got under 36 very ez. Ummm anyway about this negativity towards the next limit break im saying ez yes and you know why, because peeps like john and zweg are still shaving hella time off of their internals each week. It is when the wrs are going down by .01 of a second that we are close to the limit. Once again gratz johnny.

[WkE]

It is when the wrs are going down by .01 of a second that we are close to the limit.

not necessarily.
look here on the period between tables 205 and 226 - 7 months, and only 4 seconds improvement. It's a third from the last WR table alone, which had to deal with much more "advanced" WRs.

So slow improvement might as well indicate inactivity.

And grats John. Really impressive tightness bewteen your TT and wr TT.

[Zweq]

gz john!

[milagros]

lol this john 35 ez talk

[enil]

well, if they keep up ar this rate, maybe 4 years. if john and zweq dont, then never i guess

[SveinR]

Look, John's TT is 36:19 not 35.xx. Of course 36:19 is an absolutely brilliant TT, but I don't know what Juski is thinking of.

[The_BoneLESS]

Look, John's TT is 36:19 not 35.xx. Of course 36:19 is an absolutely brilliant TT, but I don't know what Juski is thinking of.

I think it's because one of John's time got the WR tt under 36 that Juski thinks that way.

[Zweq]

well then the other dates are wrong because those are personal minute breaks and wr tt was always under weeks/months before that.

I considered it as some bad joke.

[Memphis]

I think it was zwegs hiflyer as well that brought it under wasn't it?

[The_BoneLESS]

I think it was zwegs hiflyer as well that brought it under wasn't it?

think you're right. Just some stupid comment by Juski

[teajay]

come on guys, didn't we all know juski just foaled us/foaled himself?

[Xiphias]

enough bs..

Elma tt will be under 35mins when I start playing elma again. And John has gotten 35mins total time before the end of this year.

[Juski]

After making such an embarassing mistake it's even worse i'm away for so long before noticing it. At the moment of posting first post i thought the minute limit brakers was the ones who got the total time under.

[WkE]

anyway, under 35 minutes in January 2010.

and no, I do not begin my post with "if no one will be active..." or "depends on new versions and left alovolt" or the infamous "never!! impsy!". come on people, it's guessing, play the game.

[teajay]

OK, guessing then. I say this:

9th march 2012, table #429

[Lukazz]

i think december 2009

[Polarix]

april 2010

[milagros]

After making such an embarassing mistake it's even worse i'm away for so long before noticing it. At the moment of posting first post i thought the minute limit brakers was the ones who got the total time under.

then it was zweq this time:)

[Juski]

After making such an embarassing mistake it's even worse i'm away for so long before noticing it. At the moment of posting first post i thought the minute limit brakers was the ones who got the total time under.

then it was zweq this time:)

Once again my bad. Thought zweq mentioned john's run took it under :/

[John]

Code: Select all

WRtt
- 44 Minutes: #002, 12 March 2000
- 43 Minutes: #004, 24 March 2000
- 42 Minutes: #020, 4 June 2000
- 41 Minutes: #049, 10 December 2000
- 40 Minutes: #077, 2 December 2001
- 39 Minutes: #099, 27 October 2002
- 38 Minutes: #135, 14 July 2003
- 37 Minutes: #189, 31 October 2004
- 36 Minutes: #265, 15 June 2007

[milagros]

After making such an embarassing mistake it's even worse i'm away for so long before noticing it. At the moment of posting first post i thought the minute limit brakers was the ones who got the total time under.

then it was zweq this time:)

Once again my bad. Thought zweq mentioned john's run took it under :/

no it was zweq's hifly
first he made 31.30, then john 1.15.25 in ah, wr tt was 36.00.24 and then zweq drove 30.66

[milagros]

back to topic :
I guess never, it took 3 years to do last minute break, there are only two players that can improve more than some 0.xx and it would take some 5-6 years for them and I guess they will loose motivation
and of course much better possible, only it won't be ever done:/

[Ramone]

many players can improve wr´s with over a second.

[milagros]

many players can improve wr´s with over a second.

the problem is that same wr:)

[Zweq]

many players can improve wr´s with over a second.

the problem is that same wr:)

no the problem is that they dont try and say internals are höyled to max

[berhabdul]

very nice indeed. can i have sex with your dad now?

[Mawane]

#290: 35:49,75
only 49,76 left, go go go! i know its passibel

[itoanuak]

pasibel but maybe on a dildo bike

[Schumi]

zweq do teh 00,02 on bounce back -> 34:59.99

[Schumi]

My guesses Comment if you want.

Code: Select all

01. 00:13,98
02. 00:15,01
03. 00:17,78
04. 00:29,57
05. 00:19,84
06. 00:29,81
07. 00:27,22
08. 00:20,52
09. 00:53,67
10. 00:10,30
11. 00:22,83
12. 00:20,72
13. 00:13,92
14. 00:17,59
15. 00:48,89
16. 01:22,17
17. 00:53,84
18. 00:44,31
19. 00:35,90
20. 00:56,71
21. 00:14,37
22. 00:38,77
23. 00:35,86
24. 00:39,22
25. 00:24,16
26. 00:21,92
27. 00:33,84
28. 00:48,61
29. 00:41,93
30. 00:28,61
31. 01:11,21
32. 00:42,27
33. 00:53,61
34. 00:36,21
35. 02:11,26
36. 00:56,81
37. 00:52,41
38. 00:28,97
39. 00:38,24
40. 01:21,31
41. 00:38,54
42. 00:47,10
43. 00:55,86
44. 00:11,47
45. 00:32,46
46. 00:51,43
47. 00:19,14
48. 00:44,23
49. 00:37,68
50. 00:52,63
51. 00:42,21
52. 00:24,64
53. 00:17,11
54. 01:11,32
==========
TT: 34:59,99

[Zweq]

My guesses Comment if you want.

Code: Select all

01. 00:13,98 H C
02. 00:15,01 H C
03. 00:17,78 H C
04. 00:29,57 C
05. 00:19,84 C
06. 00:29,81 C
07. 00:27,22 C
08. 00:20,52 C
09. 00:53,67 H C
10. 00:10,30 no idea
11. 00:22,83 no idea
12. 00:20,72 no idea
13. 00:13,92 H C
14. 00:17,59 H C
15. 00:48,89 C
16. 01:22,17 C
17. 00:53,84 C 
18. 00:44,31 H C
19. 00:35,90 H C
20. 00:56,71 H C
21. 00:14,37 no idea, C
22. 00:38,77 H C
23. 00:35,86 H C
24. 00:39,22 C
25. 00:24,16 H C
26. 00:21,92 H C (ez 21.5x)
27. 00:33,84 C
28. 00:48,61 C
29. 00:41,93 C
30. 00:28,61 no idea
31. 01:11,21 C
32. 00:42,27 C
33. 00:53,61 H C
34. 00:36,21 C
35. 02:11,26 C
36. 00:56,81 H C
37. 00:52,41 C
38. 00:28,97 no idea
39. 00:38,24 C
40. 01:21,31 C
41. 00:38,54 H C
42. 00:47,10 H C
43. 00:55,86 C
44. 00:11,47 C                  ;D
45. 00:32,46 C
46. 00:51,43 C
47. 00:19,14 C
48. 00:44,23 H C
49. 00:37,68 C
50. 00:52,63 H C
51. 00:42,21 H C
52. 00:24,64 H C
53. 00:17,11 H C
54. 01:11,32 H C
==========
TT: 34:59,99

H = Human can do
C = Computer can do
just my five cents

[Ves]

Hey, you personally promised 22,80 in Gravity Ride! Why now "no idea"?

Looks like you believe too much in computers

[Memphis]

Ya we will get there. Probably somewhere around the time of 2014. Usually helps when someone finds a crazy time cut to a level or two because some of them predicted times on certain levels seem near crazy but then again who knows.

[gimp]

double trouble seems the most unlikely to me....

[Xiphias]

Circuitous and free fall already beaten!

[teajay]

hihi, always like when these guesses turn out to easy.

[Schumi]

Code: Select all

44. 00:11,47 C                  ;D

H = Human can do
C = Computer can do
just my five cents

Huh?

[western]

Ya we will get there. Probably somewhere around the time of 2014. Usually helps when someone finds a crazy time cut to a level or two because some of them predicted times on certain levels seem near crazy but then again who knows.

My guess is around six years from now too. Maybe more, but if people keep hoyling it may reach 34:xx,xx. But never 33:xx,xx.

what do you think?

[Lukazz]

ye i think 34 will be reached in 5-10 years, 33 not

[Bismuth]

I agree too. But hey, WR TT is now around 35:45, isn't it..? It's been almost a year and a half, and 15 secs... so yeah, 5 years is an OK guess.

[Mawane]

i think WR TT will be 35 next year, seriously
with those 1-2s per WR update in average, i think its possible

[pawq]

yea, wrs are made quite often these days, but notice that total improvement of every whole table stays around 0,4-0,5s so if every month there were 2 updates (1s) then during 1 year 12s would be cut off. in case of that i also guess its liek 4-5 years.

[western]

i think WR TT will be 35 next year, seriously

oh man, I've read "35 years" there. maybe it will take 35 years?

[western]

with those 1-2s per WR update in average, i think its possible

don't forget:
May: one update
June: one update
July: two updates
August: two updates
September: one update
October: two updates
November: oh updates

there have been nine updates in seven months­...
it's not the one-update-per-week we used to have! ;)

in fact, here's some data:
#265: 35:59,60 (June 2007)
#292: 35:49,19 (November 2008)
by the same pattern, give it close to ten years.