New internal times
Moderator: Moporators
Re: New internal times
and i dont think talli was trying real hard to get it accepted
and btw steep corner 45:86
and btw steep corner 45:86
Re: New internal times
If I remember correctly, talli reaches the bounce later than Stini, but touches the flower before him? This would indicate his rec is even more buggish, and if Stini's bounce was borderline bug, then talli's must be a bug. Had talli reached the bounce before Stini, and had the bounce been equally fast, it would not have been concidered a bug.jaytea wrote:i think that by accepting Stini's bounce without explanation or reasoning, px has indicated to us that he is willing to accept any kind of bugbounce on that level. and by not accepting talli's i would hope that he provided talli with a precise quantitative explanation of what makes his unacceptable and Stini's acceptable
John: lol hittade ett popcorn i naveln
(19:52:06) (@Madnezz) The Golden Apple Award goes to.....
(19:52:36) (@Madnezz) ib9814.lev by igge!!!
(19:52:06) (@Madnezz) The Golden Apple Award goes to.....
(19:52:36) (@Madnezz) ib9814.lev by igge!!!
Zweq wrote:99.9999% of nabs haven't even opened the book yet and most of those that have are still on the first pages
- The_BoneLESS
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4604
- Joined: 7 Sep 2003, 00:30
- Team: HHIT
- Location: Dangerously close to the St-Lawrence River
- Contact:
Re: New internal times
Depends on the quality of the bounce. Your implication is based on a false antecedent.Igge wrote:If I remember correctly, talli reaches the bounce later than Stini, but touches the flower before him? This would indicate his rec is even more buggish, and if Stini's bounce was borderline bug, then talli's must be a bug. Had talli reached the bounce before Stini, and had the bounce been equally fast, it would not have been concidered a bug.jaytea wrote:i think that by accepting Stini's bounce without explanation or reasoning, px has indicated to us that he is willing to accept any kind of bugbounce on that level. and by not accepting talli's i would hope that he provided talli with a precise quantitative explanation of what makes his unacceptable and Stini's acceptable
The fact that it's a bug bounce does not imply that a normal (or acceptable) bounce can't be done faster.
And even the case being, Stini's bounce was accepted so there's no actual full-proof reason why any better bounce should be rejected.
Website || TT:38:05:33 || WC5:15th || HHIT for life || 9th world wide ... BAP is next
Re: New internal times
A typical 'bug', as everyone feels, implies that the bike leaves the object faster than when it has arrived at it, simply unnatural movements...that being said this rule can be up for interpretation and this has come up many times regarding enigma specifically...even on pipe where stini had finished with the 'pipe bounce' it was too buggy and not accepted, even though very similar to talli's case, it was a controlled move and had been executed similarly multiple times by stini himself.
I just find this grey area of buggy and not buggy something that needs to be resolved, there's only a few ways to do this..
1) Don't accept bounces. Period. (obviously not practical and doesn't help with the advancement of better times, also erases value of many wrs)
2) Accept ALL bounces, bugs or none as long as they are within reason (ie. the player has other replays supporting that their movements were intentional, so no bounces like in islands in the sky going all the way to flower hehe)
3) Rather than have one person decide whether or not the rec is legit, have an official panel that reviews it in detail, and if a review is made by this panel, have the results published with an explanation of why the rec was accepted/rejected.
That's all...sorry for the topic dumping
I just find this grey area of buggy and not buggy something that needs to be resolved, there's only a few ways to do this..
1) Don't accept bounces. Period. (obviously not practical and doesn't help with the advancement of better times, also erases value of many wrs)
2) Accept ALL bounces, bugs or none as long as they are within reason (ie. the player has other replays supporting that their movements were intentional, so no bounces like in islands in the sky going all the way to flower hehe)
3) Rather than have one person decide whether or not the rec is legit, have an official panel that reviews it in detail, and if a review is made by this panel, have the results published with an explanation of why the rec was accepted/rejected.
That's all...sorry for the topic dumping
Total Time: 38:35,14
Re: New internal times
Expert System - 54.55
TT: 37:03:04 || 22 Polish Records || 54 WC || Team [EF]
Re: New internal times
should we expect some nice wr now?
omg... really: oh my god, after so so so so many hours spent on enigma i have finally done it Id like to officially thank Mielz, this turned out to be possible for me only thanks to his tips, i wouldn't have made it without his help
so:
Enigma - 31,76 (from 53,93)
ps. haeh, pwnd ya here smaxa, and gonna get ya in tt too
omg... really: oh my god, after so so so so many hours spent on enigma i have finally done it Id like to officially thank Mielz, this turned out to be possible for me only thanks to his tips, i wouldn't have made it without his help
so:
Enigma - 31,76 (from 53,93)
ps. haeh, pwnd ya here smaxa, and gonna get ya in tt too
Team TR
Multi WR in Labyrinth with GRob
Best Internal Total Times, Pipe stats & Pipe archive
World kuski map, World Cup stats
Re: New internal times
The Steppes - 11.21
first finish
first finish
Re: New internal times
11.07
Russian Record
Russian Record
Re: New internal times
nice Mika
Expert System - 54.39
Expert System - 54.39
TT: 37:03:04 || 22 Polish Records || 54 WC || Team [EF]
- Grace
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4861
- Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
- Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.
Re: New internal times
your still a minute away.Pawq wrote:should we expect some nice wr now?
omg... really: oh my god, after so so so so many hours spent on enigma i have finally done it Id like to officially thank Mielz, this turned out to be possible for me only thanks to his tips, i wouldn't have made it without his help
so:
Enigma - 31,76 (from 53,93)
ps. haeh, pwnd ya here smaxa, and gonna get ya in tt too
Cyberscore!
___________________________________________________
Targets: 8 Legendary, 26 WC, 18 Pro, 2 Good | AvgTT: 39:20:99
___________________________________________________
Targets: 8 Legendary, 26 WC, 18 Pro, 2 Good | AvgTT: 39:20:99
Re: New internal times
Expert System - 54.00
TT: 37:03:04 || 22 Polish Records || 54 WC || Team [EF]
Re: New internal times
thx and gratz, finallyPawq wrote:Id like to officially thank Mielz, this turned out to be possible for me only thanks to his tips, i wouldn't have made it without his help
Hehe - 58,91 gonna try wc here
and Kowal, ez wr
Re: New internal times
Twin peaks: 18.06
Re: New internal times
Jaws: 1:03,28 --> 56,31
Re: New internal times
Go away internalist
Re: New internal times
omg, sickjamppa wrote:Twin peaks: 18.06
Re: New internal times
It is!!Mawane wrote:omg, sickjamppa wrote:Twin peaks: 18.06
Ok... Warm Up 14.48, I said that?
Long Haul 35.90?
This one I'm sure it's new: Circuitous 34.03 29.41
Re: New internal times
Hehe - 58,39
Circu - 25,31 ez 24,low
Circu - 25,31 ez 24,low
Re: New internal times
Recent improvements:
07: 36.37 -> 34.06
33: 1.21.69 -> 1.13.56
39: 44.51 -> 41.68
I'm satisfied
07: 36.37 -> 34.06
33: 1.21.69 -> 1.13.56
39: 44.51 -> 41.68
I'm satisfied
- The_BoneLESS
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4604
- Joined: 7 Sep 2003, 00:30
- Team: HHIT
- Location: Dangerously close to the St-Lawrence River
- Contact:
Re: New internal times
Downhill: 53.31 --> 52.42 (still with bad style and bad ending, gotta try newer styles)
Website || TT:38:05:33 || WC5:15th || HHIT for life || 9th world wide ... BAP is next
Re: New internal times
I just got this feeling that you're aiming for 36 min TT now kowal
same as you XDLukazz wrote:o_O nice haircut!
Re: New internal times
I have 49. o,o
John: lol hittade ett popcorn i naveln
(19:52:06) (@Madnezz) The Golden Apple Award goes to.....
(19:52:36) (@Madnezz) ib9814.lev by igge!!!
(19:52:06) (@Madnezz) The Golden Apple Award goes to.....
(19:52:36) (@Madnezz) ib9814.lev by igge!!!
Zweq wrote:99.9999% of nabs haven't even opened the book yet and most of those that have are still on the first pages
- Grace
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4861
- Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
- Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.
Re: New internal times
well stupid idiot me was playing 24h tt, of course did a pr under diff name on diff state.
Ramp Frenzy: 1:02:34 -> 59:09, Good.
now i've either gotta beat it, or find a way to merge.
Ramp Frenzy: 1:02:34 -> 59:09, Good.
now i've either gotta beat it, or find a way to merge.
Cyberscore!
___________________________________________________
Targets: 8 Legendary, 26 WC, 18 Pro, 2 Good | AvgTT: 39:20:99
___________________________________________________
Targets: 8 Legendary, 26 WC, 18 Pro, 2 Good | AvgTT: 39:20:99
Re: New internal times
I don't think that should be really hard to do 59 on ramp frenzy again.. at least I can do it pretty easily
Re: New internal times
Nice, Ecchi! I'm trying to get lab under 1 min tooEcchi wrote:The steppes: 14:57 and labyrinth 59:16
Re: New internal times
Boneless,
what time/level did you play to drop the time down?
Thanks,
what time/level did you play to drop the time down?
Thanks,
Religious Man
|| TT: 37:47:70 || EX New Wave WR + Animal Farm WR || 24 Canadian Records || TEC Bronze Medal || HHIT in the 37min club || http://elastomaster.tripod.com/ ||
|| TT: 37:47:70 || EX New Wave WR + Animal Farm WR || 24 Canadian Records || TEC Bronze Medal || HHIT in the 37min club || http://elastomaster.tripod.com/ ||
Re: New internal times
I upload my state.dat on stats.elastomania.ru. I've probably uploaded 3 different state-files there, but get all my best times. You don't get those nice stats and all, but you get your tt :pSmaXa wrote:well stupid idiot me was playing 24h tt, of course did a pr under diff name on diff state.
Ramp Frenzy: 1:02:34 -> 59:09, Good.
now i've either gotta beat it, or find a way to merge.
TT: 42
Re: New internal times
Guess this would help youSmaXa wrote:well stupid idiot me was playing 24h tt, of course did a pr under diff name on diff state.
Ramp Frenzy: 1:02:34 -> 59:09, Good.
now i've either gotta beat it, or find a way to merge.
- The_BoneLESS
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4604
- Joined: 7 Sep 2003, 00:30
- Team: HHIT
- Location: Dangerously close to the St-Lawrence River
- Contact:
Re: New internal times
dropped downhill to 52.xx, still sucks ducks.Memphis wrote:Boneless,
what time/level did you play to drop the time down?
Thanks,
Website || TT:38:05:33 || WC5:15th || HHIT for life || 9th world wide ... BAP is next
-
- 39mins club
- Posts: 423
- Joined: 12 May 2009, 15:28
- Location: A "child friendly" neighbourhood;o
Re: New internal times
The steppes: 13:04 SO fækkings close to pro now;<
RIP enthusiast claim image:(
Re: New internal times
Enigma from 20:34 to 19:71 tonight
Still no strong bounce but i hope i get one soon...
Think its the best from norway???
Still no strong bounce but i hope i get one soon...
Think its the best from norway???
TT: 39:59:70
6 World class 17 Professionals 30Good 0 Ok
6 World class 17 Professionals 30Good 0 Ok
Re: New internal times
Tor seems to have 19,40.
Re: New internal times
dont overwrite your recs, some might be classed in bugsThunder wrote:Enigma from 20:34 to 19:71 tonight
Still no strong bounce but i hope i get one soon...
Think its the best from norway???
- Grace
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4861
- Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
- Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.
Re: New internal times
Ramp Frenzy: 1:02:34/59:09 -> 56:38
Random run, Pro and Australian record, fucking awesome!
Random run, Pro and Australian record, fucking awesome!
Cyberscore!
___________________________________________________
Targets: 8 Legendary, 26 WC, 18 Pro, 2 Good | AvgTT: 39:20:99
___________________________________________________
Targets: 8 Legendary, 26 WC, 18 Pro, 2 Good | AvgTT: 39:20:99
Re: New internal times
Im going to keep all of my recs from 20:00 and down to 18:99... So i can compare and have some evidence of different bounce
I hate that Tor is from norway
I hate that Tor is from norway
TT: 39:59:70
6 World class 17 Professionals 30Good 0 Ok
6 World class 17 Professionals 30Good 0 Ok
Re: New internal times
Upside Down - 1:01.17
ez much better
ez much better
TT: 37:03:04 || 22 Polish Records || 54 WC || Team [EF]
Re: New internal times
some bored cruising on shit laptop vsync on >.<
tunnel terror 1:03 -> 59,51
tunnel terror 1:03 -> 59,51
39:37,91
Re: New internal times
make 18.98 and don't save rec =DThunder wrote:Im going to keep all of my recs from 20:00 and down to 18:99... So i can compare and have some evidence of different bounce
I hate that Tor is from norway
Seize the day
Re: New internal times
Upside Down - 1:00.93
TT: 37:03:04 || 22 Polish Records || 54 WC || Team [EF]
Re: New internal times
If i get under 18:98 my elma time is over... Then you can find my computer on Ebay
TT: 39:59:70
6 World class 17 Professionals 30Good 0 Ok
6 World class 17 Professionals 30Good 0 Ok