New internal times
Moderator: Moporators
Re: New internal times
Enigma 19.16... 3 desimel 19.161
TT: 39:59:70
6 World class 17 Professionals 30Good 0 Ok
6 World class 17 Professionals 30Good 0 Ok
Re: New internal times
Yeah:):):):):) If it only had been 3 decimals on WR tables
TT: 39:59:70
6 World class 17 Professionals 30Good 0 Ok
6 World class 17 Professionals 30Good 0 Ok
Re: New internal times
I take it you won't share your replay?
Thorze wrote:I just wanted to make a cool topic like Juish have cool topics..
Re: New internal times
Not now... Gonna hoyl a little more before laying it out:) So anyone dont take away WR....
The bounce i use is pretty easy to get, its just the rest that is impossible with my laptop since i cant push in to many buttons...
The bounce i use is pretty easy to get, its just the rest that is impossible with my laptop since i cant push in to many buttons...
TT: 39:59:70
6 World class 17 Professionals 30Good 0 Ok
6 World class 17 Professionals 30Good 0 Ok
- Grace
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4861
- Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
- Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.
Re: New internal times
Shadow Enigma WR W/ Laptop W/o bugbounce.
Grats dude!
Grats dude!
Cyberscore!
___________________________________________________
Targets: 8 Legendary, 26 WC, 18 Pro, 2 Good | AvgTT: 39:20:99
___________________________________________________
Targets: 8 Legendary, 26 WC, 18 Pro, 2 Good | AvgTT: 39:20:99
Re: New internal times
Meh, I could do that in my sleep.
Sadly though, I couldn't do it for real. o,o
Though dream-wr here I come!
- Nice thunder! Seriously, 19.15 would be EPIC.
Sadly though, I couldn't do it for real. o,o
Though dream-wr here I come!
- Nice thunder! Seriously, 19.15 would be EPIC.
John: lol hittade ett popcorn i naveln
(19:52:06) (@Madnezz) The Golden Apple Award goes to.....
(19:52:36) (@Madnezz) ib9814.lev by igge!!!
(19:52:06) (@Madnezz) The Golden Apple Award goes to.....
(19:52:36) (@Madnezz) ib9814.lev by igge!!!
Zweq wrote:99.9999% of nabs haven't even opened the book yet and most of those that have are still on the first pages
Re: New internal times
i knew you could do it thunder. how much faster did you reach bounce than stini?
im pretty good at elma
Re: New internal times
I'm trying to get rid of my 19.48 bance bug, it looks just like tallis.
Hoyled some first with Thunder in belma yesterday and later on the night with adi, i got 19.51 with normal bounce not so buggy i guess. Also got .60 .72 and .96. Got apple at 16.40 on my 19.51 and 16.45 on my 19.60.
Hoyled some first with Thunder in belma yesterday and later on the night with adi, i got 19.51 with normal bounce not so buggy i guess. Also got .60 .72 and .96. Got apple at 16.40 on my 19.51 and 16.45 on my 19.60.
Re: New internal times
gosh it seems that table 300 could become non buggy table at last
Keep it up Thunder
Keep it up Thunder
Re: New internal times
hangman 14.87 was fairly ez, but dunno about wc
"It's good to be having fun, but it'd be funnier to be good"
Re: New internal times
Wtf sik ez wr o,o
Team MiE - MiE Cup 1
Prestigious member of 14.6x Tutor14 club
Prestigious member of 14.6x Tutor14 club
- Grace
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4861
- Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
- Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.
Re: New internal times
Hangman: 15:55 -> 14:99
The Steppes: 14:01 -> 12:84
TT: some 43:14:50
The Steppes: 14:01 -> 12:84
TT: some 43:14:50
Cyberscore!
___________________________________________________
Targets: 8 Legendary, 26 WC, 18 Pro, 2 Good | AvgTT: 39:20:99
___________________________________________________
Targets: 8 Legendary, 26 WC, 18 Pro, 2 Good | AvgTT: 39:20:99
Re: New internal times
Jaws - 56,96
- Grace
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4861
- Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
- Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.
Re: New internal times
Fruit in the Den: 1:06:23 -> 1:02:93
Hill Legend: 18:58 -> 18:33
TT: 43:10:95
Edit:
Enigma: 33:08 -> 29:67, ez better coming i hope.
TT: 43:07:54
Hill Legend: 18:58 -> 18:33
TT: 43:10:95
Edit:
Enigma: 33:08 -> 29:67, ez better coming i hope.
TT: 43:07:54
Cyberscore!
___________________________________________________
Targets: 8 Legendary, 26 WC, 18 Pro, 2 Good | AvgTT: 39:20:99
___________________________________________________
Targets: 8 Legendary, 26 WC, 18 Pro, 2 Good | AvgTT: 39:20:99
Re: New internal times
Ramp Frenzy 01:01,12 Good [01:08,43 Ok]
TT: 45:01,xx Team EPC
1 - World Class . 3 - Professional . 18 - Good . 32 - Ok
My program for elma teams . Wood Kuski . Wood Kuski 2 . HER Cup Trophy
1 - World Class . 3 - Professional . 18 - Good . 32 - Ok
My program for elma teams . Wood Kuski . Wood Kuski 2 . HER Cup Trophy
Re: New internal times
Bowling - 58,83 ez better
Re: New internal times
Bowling: 56.27
TT:39.57.38
TT:39.57.38
Re: New internal times
you bad motherfucker grats!!
Team TR
Multi WR in Labyrinth with GRob
Best Internal Total Times, Pipe stats & Pipe archive
World kuski map, World Cup stats
Re: New internal times
Nice first post!GRob wrote:Bowling: 56.27
TT:39.57.38
WATHEHTKFUC WOHAT go to hell.Ecchi wrote:Enigma : 21:16 :>
Re: New internal times
Sick Ecchi, grats GRob!
Bounce back - 52,60
Bounce back - 52,60
-
- 39mins club
- Posts: 423
- Joined: 12 May 2009, 15:28
- Location: A "child friendly" neighbourhood;o
Re: New internal times
Haha, was only a 6 second TT cut;DLukazz wrote:wow, sick time for your tt ecchi!
RIP enthusiast claim image:(
Re: New internal times
hahahaha, rofl. got 19.71 on enigma with the worst turn ever
- Attachments
-
- 47L1971.rec
- (16.36 KiB) Downloaded 122 times
Re: New internal times
TT: 38:36,51 || team SPEED || Islands WR
Re: New internal times
good to know that it is possible with slow turn
Re: New internal times
Good to know, you said? Awesome to know.
Re: New internal times
49.95 on spiral... cant manage to do better somehow.... EZ under49 and OK time :/
Re: New internal times
Yeah I have over 50, and it's like what the hell why can't I drive a better time. Maybe now I could, though, as I didn't play Spiral in 6 months at least.
Re: New internal times
15,69 on hangman and 34,61 on pipe
click on tt to download stats.txt
edit: second time steppes shortcut: 16,78
click on tt to download stats.txt
edit: second time steppes shortcut: 16,78
Re: New internal times
true, Jappe, Tigro, try to put those images on the same line or something.
Re: New internal times
remove those images. they are pointless
Re: New internal times
maybe you should read THE RULES bit more closely.
Not allowed:
- Big pictures in signature (also very big ones in the posts)
- To use bigger size than 10 in signature texts
- To have over three rows signature
- To have more than one user bar in signature
- To mess the board
- Colors, bolds, font size changes etc. only in some extreme circumtances
- Other languages than English (except in 'Problems' -forum)
- Foolish talk
- Unnecessary flooding
- Pointless comments (for example "lol")
Not allowed:
- Big pictures in signature (also very big ones in the posts)
- To use bigger size than 10 in signature texts
- To have over three rows signature
- To have more than one user bar in signature
- To mess the board
- Colors, bolds, font size changes etc. only in some extreme circumtances
- Other languages than English (except in 'Problems' -forum)
- Foolish talk
- Unnecessary flooding
- Pointless comments (for example "lol")
"It's good to be having fun, but it'd be funnier to be good"
Re: New internal times
ye but when i add some reply to forum like this one, it has not changed size when i have pictures there or not, i had there pics and they didn´t enlarge my post. or what´s the reason of not having bigger pics in signatures??
Re: New internal times
It's annoying, really. It disturbs the eye and frankly, no one likes it. Just stop wondering why, it's just not useful and annoying. I suppose it's time to get back on topic now?
Re: New internal times
mine takes less to warm up. ez wr...
Re: New internal times
Raven, for me it was Pipe with my friend, he did the part starting right, and I did the part starting left. I think we had some 22 high or 23 low, is that somehow plausible? It was 3 years ago, maybe 4.