New WRs

Bismuth · Post by **Bismuth** » 13 Jul 2011, 14:33

Ves wrote:nice labpro Kazan, dream times come true after s/l practice

THIS. Why TAS is good. Fuck you haters.

Kopaka · Post by **Kopaka** » 13 Jul 2011, 17:26

Heard of train levs?

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 13 Jul 2011, 17:55

Kopaka wrote:Heard of train levs?

in train levs you never get the exact same speed as in real levs. s/l > train levs

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 13 Jul 2011, 18:05

almost one second again! Kazan you sick hoyla! Never beat by a small margin :D

Ves · Post by **Ves** » 13 Jul 2011, 18:31

Pawq wrote:almost one second again!

Go back to school to remind some maths, it's MORE than one second.

wipley · Post by **wipley** » 14 Jul 2011, 03:08

Ves wrote:
Pawq wrote:almost one second again!
Go back to school to remind some maths, it's MORE than one second.

Ves has got it, as usual.

/way to go with quality posts, Ves -- a sincere fan of Ves-powers.

Bjenn · Post by **Bjenn** » 14 Jul 2011, 06:41

Wow sick time Kazan, GratZ!
And Pawq, you strike again with another clever post hahahah, what did I tell you, not to think?

Grace · Post by **Grace** » 14 Jul 2011, 06:42

Actually Pawq is right. Kazan's time doesn't cut a second off the world record because the world record had already been beaten. 2:13:05 - 2:12:37 < 1

Bjenn · Post by **Bjenn** » 14 Jul 2011, 06:46

Haruhi wrote:Actually Pawq is right. Kazan's time doesn't cut a second off the world record because the world record had already been beaten. 2:13:05 - 2:12:37 < 1

Not true, look at Official WR table: 35. Labyrinth Pro 2:13,43 John
Kazans time before doesn't really matter, you are just used to when ppl played offline and you dont see each time they make better.
You know, ppl can make improvments more than once when they beat wrs. And what counts as improvement time is the difference of the time from table and the new time. Nothing else.

Grace · Post by **Grace** » 14 Jul 2011, 07:09

Björn wrote:
Haruhi wrote:Actually Pawq is right. Kazan's time doesn't cut a second off the world record because the world record had already been beaten. 2:13:05 - 2:12:37 < 1
Not true, look at Official WR table: 35. Labyrinth Pro 2:13,43 John
Kazans time before doesn't really matter, you are just used to when ppl played offline and you dont see each time they make better.
You know, ppl can make improvments more than once when they beat wrs. And what counts as improvement time is the difference of the time from table and the new time. Nothing else.

The world record at the time Kazan made 1.12.37 was 1.13.05 - Just because it's not on the official table doesn't mean it's not the fastest time.

Bjenn · Post by **Bjenn** » 14 Jul 2011, 07:29

What has that anything to do with the fact that he actually cut off a whole second from current WR by John? WR doesn't count until it's official.
It's a sick improvement, what you are trying to discuss here is that Kazans WR did cut off less than a second??? makes no sense.

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 14 Jul 2011, 08:17

I see the last 7 posts were very ontopic...
Who the fuck cares guys? Just one wrong digit, big deal...

Ves · Post by **Ves** » 14 Jul 2011, 09:24

Haruhi wrote:The world record at the time Kazan made 1.12.37 was 1.13.05 - Just because it's not on the official table doesn't mean it's not the fastest time.

World record is a time confirmed by px, without exceptions. Otherwise you should admit

16. Zweq [WNO] 01:16,64

is the world record.

Grace · Post by **Grace** » 14 Jul 2011, 09:25

Björn wrote:What has that anything to do with the fact that he actually cut off a whole second from current WR by John? WR doesn't count until it's official.
It's a sick improvement, what you are trying to discuss here is that Kazans WR did cut off less than a second??? makes no sense.

I am a pedantic asshole and am discussing semantics.

you are a pedantic asshole and are discussing semantics.

Ves - i consider Zq's NW time to be a WR, i also consider talli's 19,11 in enigma as a WR.

FinMan · Post by **FinMan** » 14 Jul 2011, 09:48

Ves wrote:World record is a time confirmed by px, without exceptions. Otherwise you should admit
16. Zweq [WNO] 01:16,64
is the world record.

qft.

Bjenn · Post by **Bjenn** » 14 Jul 2011, 13:34

Pawq, you just stated us making 7 off topic posts (which actually were on topic)
Now I count yours: 1, 2, 3....and 3773

Madness · Post by **Madness** » 14 Jul 2011, 13:43

Offtopic is bad, stop it Pawq.

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 14 Jul 2011, 14:15

I thought it was a good discussion. we need to determine when a wr is really official - when it's on EOL, or when it's on the WR table.

Memphis · Post by **Memphis** » 14 Jul 2011, 16:05

but none the less, a pretty boring read for anyone who was not involved. Congratz Kazan!

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 14 Jul 2011, 20:43

Igge wrote:I thought it was a good discussion. we need to determine when a wr is really official - when it's on EOL, or when it's on the WR table.

Ssurely only Moposite. WRs must appear in that table, but that doesn't mean that all times from that table are wrs. Just like all squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares... Nothing to discuss here :l

Kopaka · Post by **Kopaka** » 14 Jul 2011, 22:28

Pawq wrote:Just like all squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares... Nothing to discuss here :l

You got something wrong there..

jonsykkel · Post by **jonsykkel** » 14 Jul 2011, 22:56

Kopaka wrote:
Pawq wrote:Just like all squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares... Nothing to discuss here :l
You got something wrong there..

?

wipley · Post by **wipley** » 15 Jul 2011, 02:11

Kopaka wrote:
Pawq wrote:Just like all squares are rectangles but all rectangles are squares... Nothing to discuss here :l
You got nothing wrong there..

?

wipley · Post by **wipley** » 15 Jul 2011, 02:15

Ves wrote:
Haruhi wrote:The world record at the time Kazan made 1.12.37 was 1.13.05 - Just because it's not on the official table doesn't mean it's not the fastest time.
World record is a time confirmed by px, without exceptions. Otherwise you should admit
16. Zweq [WNO] 01:16,64
is the world record.

Igge wrote:we need to determine when a wr is really official - when it's on EOL, or when it's on the WR table.

Have you read Ves' post on the matter? It does not look like it, by the way.

Bjenn · Post by **Bjenn** » 15 Jul 2011, 07:20

Kopaka wrote:
Pawq wrote:Ssurely only Moposite. WRs must appear in that table, but that doesn't mean that all times from that table are wrs. Just like all squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares... Nothing to discuss here :l
You got something wrong there..

Indeed he got. Can barely understand watehell he is talking about, maths maybe isn't his good side. I bet he did try to think this time though before posting.

FinMan · Post by **FinMan** » 15 Jul 2011, 08:46

wipley wrote:
Igge wrote:we need to determine when a wr is really official - when it's on EOL, or when it's on the WR table.
Have you read Ves' post on the matter? It does not look like it, by the way.

Igge did NOT say anything that showed up he didn't read the posts. It's completely the other way round. What Igge said was about the discussion kept on this topic, not that we need to discuss it anymore since it was already done. This dude did not seem to understand it either, I'm not sure if he did it on purpose just to play with Igge or just for plain brainlessness..

Pawq wrote:Ssurely only Moposite. WRs must appear in that table, but that doesn't mean that all times from that table are wrs. Just like all squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares... Nothing to discuss here :l

So, PLEASE read the posts before posting crap.

And ps. that discussion Pawq claimed to be offtopic was completely on teh topic. Discussion about new wrs is seriously kinda well situated in this topic.

Grace · Post by **Grace** » 15 Jul 2011, 10:44

Björn wrote:
Kopaka wrote:
Pawq wrote:Ssurely only Moposite. WRs must appear in that table, but that doesn't mean that all times from that table are wrs. Just like all squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares... Nothing to discuss here :l
You got something wrong there..
Indeed he got. Can barely understand watehell he is talking about, maths maybe isn't his good side. I bet he did try to think this time though before posting.

What he said is mathematically correct. xD

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 15 Jul 2011, 12:45

Haruhi wrote:
Björn wrote:
Kopaka wrote:
Pawq wrote:Ssurely only Moposite. WRs must appear in that table, but that doesn't mean that all times from that table are wrs. Just like all squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares... Nothing to discuss here :l
You got something wrong there..
Indeed he got. Can barely understand watehell he is talking about, maths maybe isn't his good side. I bet he did try to think this time though before posting.
What he said is mathematically correct. xD

Yup. There is nothing wrong with that statement. However, this discussion is way offtopic. Pawq made a good and reasonable post, and people started trying to find flaws in it as usual. Let's just stop it and get back to discussing wrs here.

abruzzi · Post by **abruzzi** » 15 Jul 2011, 13:12

Kazan, what happened with the hoylage of Warm Up? Why the WR hasn't appeared yet? Is this turn really that hard? I took the appearance of U14 in 01 for granted, now it turns up that

milagros wrote:believe me, noone will do teh wr anytime soon:)

is (surprisingly?) true...

Kazan · Post by **Kazan** » 15 Jul 2011, 14:13

i will wr sometime)

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 15 Jul 2011, 14:20

good spirit)

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 18 Sep 2011, 14:38

15. Zweq [WNO] 00:49,70

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 18 Sep 2011, 14:46

I wander if talli style with hang from above?)

Madness · Post by **Madness** » 18 Sep 2011, 15:02

Nice one, Zweq ! Hmmm... Tunnel Terror... Serpents Tale... ez Sink now ? :DD:D::D:D:DD

Orcc · Post by **Orcc** » 18 Sep 2011, 15:42

You should give a hint about spoiler, damez nab

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 18 Sep 2011, 15:43

Orcc wrote:You should give a hint about spoiler, damez nab

If there's suddenly a new post in this topic after it having been inactive for 2 months that usually indicates a new wr.

Kortsu · Post by **Kortsu** » 18 Sep 2011, 17:52

Sick wr! Just in time for his own yearly analysis about wr tt drop

Chris · Post by **Chris** » 18 Sep 2011, 20:19

I thought that new 15 wr will be under 50. I hope milty won't give up and beat this wr.

Bludek · Post by **Bludek** » 18 Sep 2011, 20:22

Chris wrote:I hope milty won't give up and beat this wr.

That was exactly my first thought. Go Go Milty!
Great time tho, Z.

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 19 Sep 2011, 01:36

the fact zamppe pwned teh wr by 2 secs made it so much easier for uncle milty

Uncle Milty · Post by **Uncle Milty** » 19 Sep 2011, 11:51

Hi.

I think i wont beat that, took too much time for me to even finish "my style" crappily. But i may share my recs (eventhough only Bjorn shouldnt know them 8D )

gratz zweq..

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 19 Sep 2011, 13:54

after this kind of drop ppl usually stop hoyling because it gets hard to beat their PR
lets see if zamppe can do 48.xx;)

Hosp · Post by **Hosp** » 19 Sep 2011, 14:44

I actually told jb that I thought any time now Zweq would do u50, 1 day before this happened when Zweq had some 51.73. )

Mats · Post by **Mats** » 27 Sep 2011, 22:33

The steppes

Grace · Post by **Grace** » 28 Sep 2011, 04:43

^ Made me think that there was a legit steppes WR.

Mats · Post by **Mats** » 28 Sep 2011, 20:03

Well, the times are confirmed in eol. Gotta be legit

Labs · Post by **Labs** » 29 Sep 2011, 21:49

Grattis wr-mans! (Zweq, Kazan, GRob) We need to see u35 before edq

Memphis · Post by **Memphis** » 30 Sep 2011, 16:55

EDQ3 will wait till under 30. damz

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 2 Oct 2011, 20:06

grats Kazik for circa)

Thundr- · Post by **Thundr-** » 2 Oct 2011, 20:58

Gz kazik. Soon passing John in tt too, exciting bizniz