Lukazz wrote:i have to say i love this site now, it makes things so much easier. no more "WHERE DID YOU UP THAT REC?". awesome. thanks for making it.
question: what is this "auto-uploaded" tag? are all battle winning recs uploaded automatically to the site? doesn't seem like that.
suggestion: when you sort the recs by rating, it would be nice to have some kind of weighted rating from number of votes and the actual rating. a rec with a 5.0 rating from three votes should be behind a rec with fifteen votes and a 4.9 rating.
Thanks! There is a script running that uploads all battle winning replays to the site, but occasionally it shuts off (maybe once per 2 weeks or so) and I don't always notice it very quickly so few recs can be missing. Also in #across irc channel there is a bot (palomies) maintained by veezay who auto-uploads replays pasted in #across to recsource and those get auto-upload tag too.
And yes, some kind of weighted relevance would be good probably. At the moment replay needs to have at least three votes to count in the top rated replays, and if two replays share the same rating the one who has more votes has higher ranking. I have thought about more weighted system some time before but it needs a working formula of course.
Another thing that just recently came up in eol chat was that many replays are save/loaded and people seem to tend to rate these replays higher than legit recs and not everyone likes that. I don't know yet if there could be some solution to this but if you have any ideas or opinion about that i'd like to hear it.