Saveload WR table
Moderator: Moporators
Re: Saveload WR table
Update:
02. Flat Track — milagros - 14.67 milagros - 14.66
28. Bounce Back — Zweq - 46.61
34. Bumpy Journey — Madness - 36.13 bene - 35.93
42. Enduro — Thundr- - 46.69 Thundr - 46.38
53. Hooked — milagros - 16.93 milagros - 16.87
02. Flat Track — milagros - 14.67 milagros - 14.66
28. Bounce Back — Zweq - 46.61
34. Bumpy Journey — Madness - 36.13 bene - 35.93
42. Enduro — Thundr- - 46.69 Thundr - 46.38
53. Hooked — milagros - 16.93 milagros - 16.87
Last edited by Madness on 24 Jan 2015, 18:22, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Saveload WR table
i am not in team ef. I am in team dat.
Signatür ruined by SveinR - smaller plz :*
Re: Saveload WR table
int01 13.81
int18 44.03
int34 35.87
int18 44.03
int34 35.87
Signatür ruined by SveinR - smaller plz :*
Re: Saveload WR table
omg sick WU! better then any milaSL tiem!! Spiral soon 43
any of recs pubilc?
any of recs pubilc?
Elasto Mania - 34:21.69 | #421 - 11. April 2024
Ancient Internals
Ancient Internals
Re: Saveload WR table
Making recs public is so 19whogivesashit
Re: Saveload WR table
Update:
01. Warm Up — Zweq - 13.84 bene - 13.81
18. Spiral — bene - 44.03
29. Headbanger — Zweq - 40.70 Spef - 40.67
34. Bumpy Journey — bene - 35.93 bene - 35.87
01. Warm Up — Zweq - 13.84 bene - 13.81
18. Spiral — bene - 44.03
29. Headbanger — Zweq - 40.70 Spef - 40.67
34. Bumpy Journey — bene - 35.93 bene - 35.87
Re: Saveload WR table
Yes.Tigro wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't see the update in the first post?
Re: Saveload WR table
Wasn't there a rec by zweq for 10 zweqspin style that was 10.xx and faster than wr? Or was it slower? Can't find rec anymore
Re: Saveload WR table
Signatür ruined by SveinR - smaller plz :*
Re: Saveload WR table
bene could you fill the missing WRs pls?
Re: Saveload WR table
Thanks bene and thanks for upload to recsource
Re: Saveload WR table
Guess noone beat this
- Attachments
-
- 10AKB0899.rec
- (14.75 KiB) Downloaded 226 times
Re: Saveload WR table
nitro patch...sunl wrote:Edit: Oh lol just watched Mats' rec
Re: Saveload WR table
23.92 hang tight done in like january, 0.04! but yeah you can always do 0.01 better end all the way down to 21.xx, who can draw a line?
Re: Saveload WR table
(accidentally posted, please ignore)
Please update Zweq time
Also bene say get 20.54 in sky islands
http://mopolauta.moposite.com/viewtopic ... 27#p242762
Please update Zweq time
Also bene say get 20.54 in sky islands
http://mopolauta.moposite.com/viewtopic ... 27#p242762
Re: Saveload WR table
calculated a total time: 33:36,83
(missing levels substituted by normal int wrs)
ggoogo for 32
(missing levels substituted by normal int wrs)
ggoogo for 32
Last edited by Schumi on 29 Jul 2015, 12:27, edited 1 time in total.
Elasto Mania - 34:21.69 | #421 - 11. April 2024
Ancient Internals
Ancient Internals
Re: Saveload WR table
on all the remaining levels (except pipe and slalom) the 32tt time was without any bugs and bounces
on slalom i did some better time without bounces too, i forgot what was the time:)
on slalom i did some better time without bounces too, i forgot what was the time:)
[carebox]
Re: Saveload WR table
oke,
- steppes slower
- bounce back: are u sure?
- steep corner: kazan has better
- pipe: buggy
- slalom: time unknown
- steppes slower
- bounce back: are u sure?
- steep corner: kazan has better
- pipe: buggy
- slalom: time unknown
Elasto Mania - 34:21.69 | #421 - 11. April 2024
Ancient Internals
Ancient Internals
Re: Saveload WR table
We would get an amazing 0.03 SL wr TT drop from filling all holes with 32tt times that are legit.
Signatür ruined by SveinR - smaller plz :*
Re: Saveload WR table
which lev are you talking about bene?
Elasto Mania - 34:21.69 | #421 - 11. April 2024
Ancient Internals
Ancient Internals
Re: Saveload WR table
those times are inculeded. btw do you have an SL loopdeloop time? can 17.4x be done?
Elasto Mania - 34:21.69 | #421 - 11. April 2024
Ancient Internals
Ancient Internals
Re: Saveload WR table
and steppes 10.49 (i hoyled last 5 secs)
bounce back had also some non-bounce rec
pipe with brutal is same buggy as any other <32 pipe time
i didnt know about steep corner, because it is not in the table
bounce back had also some non-bounce rec
pipe with brutal is same buggy as any other <32 pipe time
i didnt know about steep corner, because it is not in the table
[carebox]
Re: Saveload WR table
TT updated with -00:00,01
can u post bounce back rec/time?
can u post bounce back rec/time?
Elasto Mania - 34:21.69 | #421 - 11. April 2024
Ancient Internals
Ancient Internals
Re: Saveload WR table
Your cockiness is uncalled for. Table is already full of "arbitrary legitness" like hi flyer, pipe, animal farm, enigma osv so there wouldn't really be a problem adding more shitbugs like haircut 37.xx. I also have 50 labyrinth and the bug is not stronger than in hi flyer. Mila's 29.52 long haul is also better looking than hi flyer I guess, it wasn't uploaded due to missing hand animations, or what abot 29.36, or what about 29.61. Pick whatever strength you want.bene wrote:We would get an amazing 0.03 SL wr TT drop from filling all holes with 32tt times that are legit.
If we want to talk about actual 100% clean recs, as in no bugs at all there were some clean recs by mila that are not in the table, til exemppel 17.19 twin peaks. Don't know why it isn't there.
Last edited by Zweq on 29 Jul 2015, 23:09, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Saveload WR table
Vtf my post was än yoke zamppe is mad.
To esplain:
Mila was talking about holes in SL wr table and adding those 32tt times and hade legit in his post.
Holes ( this post ) - 32tt time ( that post ):
05 - there is better SL
10 - live wr better
13 - 0.02 drop
14 - 0.01 drop
22 - was bug/unknown unbug time.
28 - 32tt is bug, zamppe beat other nonbug rec that was SL wr.
30 - bug
32 - live wr better
Osv.
Filling holes with 32tt time has almost no effect. Ofc there are other times like twin pyks that has bigger effect but he already hade time here but could and maybe should be added.
To esplain:
Mila was talking about holes in SL wr table and adding those 32tt times and hade legit in his post.
Holes ( this post ) - 32tt time ( that post ):
05 - there is better SL
10 - live wr better
13 - 0.02 drop
14 - 0.01 drop
22 - was bug/unknown unbug time.
28 - 32tt is bug, zamppe beat other nonbug rec that was SL wr.
30 - bug
32 - live wr better
Osv.
Filling holes with 32tt time has almost no effect. Ofc there are other times like twin pyks that has bigger effect but he already hade time here but could and maybe should be added.
Signatür ruined by SveinR - smaller plz :*
Re: Saveload WR table
I'm not mad, im zamppe. No but I'm just defending a friend, nothing to do with me. I don't mind at all anyone criticizing my own runs. But I've seen mila get much hate in public and private conversations (like whatever he does is somehow wrong), "his code is shit bla bla bla" "his recs are buggy and shit bla bla bla" "he cant höyl bla bla bla" And your post looked like addition to it. What the fuck is wrong with people giving shit to mila all the time. Mila might write arrogant looking comments on lauta sometimes and he might not be as good at elma as toringe, but he has done good höyling job imo with SL and also so fukin ultra much for the scene, like how many tools did he make again? made belma, rewrote it abaut 3 times meanwhile some ultramorons were terrorizing belma consistently. Then still orkade make eol just to please all the retards, pretty cool imo.bene wrote:Vtf my post was än yoke zamppe is mad.
Then later al kind of coder wannabes come up and act max cool for 1 week omgomg eol so shit, col story bro.. try working on your shit fukin code for 3 years instead of 1 week and you might actualy create something useful one day.
Re: Saveload WR table
Agree with zweq
(but also don't think bene said anything wrong)
(but also don't think bene said anything wrong)
Re: Saveload WR table
omg wtf haircut style
edit: we may call it "bounce from pussy" style .D
edit: we may call it "bounce from pussy" style .D
Elasto Mania - 34:21.69 | #421 - 11. April 2024
Ancient Internals
Ancient Internals
Re: Saveload WR table
haircut run is by zweq, but i think i did the bounce:) i am not sure though
i didn't know there is better than 10.49 steppes time or what did bene mean
zweq's time was .50 and i hoyled end to .49
edit: not sure if final twin peaks wasn't 17.18 (anyway, first 10 secs were by zweq there too)
i didn't know there is better than 10.49 steppes time or what did bene mean
zweq's time was .50 and i hoyled end to .49
edit: not sure if final twin peaks wasn't 17.18 (anyway, first 10 secs were by zweq there too)
[carebox]
Re: Saveload WR table
I mean time in 32tt post is some old and nat updated .6x time. Have nat seen .49 mentioned anywhere before now. Wr being .50 and zweqspin SL was also .50 osv.
Signatür ruined by SveinR - smaller plz :*
Re: Saveload WR table
Update:
03. Twin Peaks — Kazan - 17.38 milagros - 17.19
05. Uphill Battle — milagros - 19.77
06. Long Haul — anpdad - 29.85 milagros - 29.52
10. The Steppes — milagros - 10.49
12. Islands in the Sky — Madness - 20.57 bene - 20.54
13. Hill Legend — milagros - 13.85
14. Loop-de-Loop — milagros - 17.55
52. Hang Tight — Zweq - 23.96 Zweq - 23.92
03. Twin Peaks — Kazan - 17.38 milagros - 17.19
05. Uphill Battle — milagros - 19.77
06. Long Haul — anpdad - 29.85 milagros - 29.52
10. The Steppes — milagros - 10.49
12. Islands in the Sky — Madness - 20.57 bene - 20.54
13. Hill Legend — milagros - 13.85
14. Loop-de-Loop — milagros - 17.55
52. Hang Tight — Zweq - 23.96 Zweq - 23.92
Re: Saveload WR table
imo int05 should be bene and/or kazan 19.69 and not milagros 19.77
Rec here: http://www.recsource.tv/r/voxzbrdwuy
Rec here: http://www.recsource.tv/r/voxzbrdwuy
Signatür ruined by SveinR - smaller plz :*
Re: Saveload WR table
Other possible (borderline) candidates:
http://www.recsource.tv/r/drjqhaziuf
http://www.recsource.tv/r/pjuzmvchba
http://www.recsource.tv/r/fpdtknbjer
http://www.recsource.tv/r/zxtedfkhal
http://www.recsource.tv/r/drjqhaziuf
http://www.recsource.tv/r/pjuzmvchba
http://www.recsource.tv/r/fpdtknbjer
http://www.recsource.tv/r/zxtedfkhal
Re: Saveload WR table
51.37 Zig Zag by Zweq is not borderline (http://www.recsource.tv/r/drjqhaziuf)
Re: Saveload WR table
Ye but I was too lazy to point it out in my post
Re: Saveload WR table
Update:
05. Uphill Battle — milagros - 19.77 Kazan - 19.69
22. Slalom — Madness - 38.50
28. Bounce Back — Madness - 45.64
30. Pipe — Madness - 28.63
32. Steep Corner — Madness - 41.99
33. Zig-Zag — Kazan - 52.29 Zweq - 51.37
05. Uphill Battle — milagros - 19.77 Kazan - 19.69
22. Slalom — Madness - 38.50
28. Bounce Back — Madness - 45.64
30. Pipe — Madness - 28.63
32. Steep Corner — Madness - 41.99
33. Zig-Zag — Kazan - 52.29 Zweq - 51.37
Re: Saveload WR table
Where recs madness?
Re: Saveload WR table
Update:
08. Tag — Zweq - 20.23 Madness - 19.75
12. Islands in the Sky — bene - 20.54 Madness - 20.41
22. Slalom — Madness - 38.50 Madness - 38.31
08. Tag — Zweq - 20.23 Madness - 19.75
12. Islands in the Sky — bene - 20.54 Madness - 20.41
22. Slalom — Madness - 38.50 Madness - 38.31
Re: Saveload WR table
I knew that one day the WR in tag will be under 20. The only thing to do now is to drive legit time