New WRs

anpdad · Post by **anpdad** » 10 Nov 2005, 09:58

thats omagad sick! I guess u used ramone's style in this one.. or not?

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 10 Nov 2005, 10:18

sick :* if ramone style share rec! if not: share too :***

Jazka · Post by **Jazka** » 10 Nov 2005, 15:12

Amazing improvement

He must have used this start style...

http://www.kopaka.dk/up/updir/37Jazka.rec

Freezen · Post by **Freezen** » 10 Nov 2005, 15:51

Jazka wrote:Amazing improvement

He must have used this start style...
http://www.kopaka.dk/up/updir/37Jazka.rec

That's a new style to me, but no way faster than bounce..
i guess ramone's start style could save that much alone..
anyway, great wr! all we need is the rec now..

but don't send it when i'm away from the computer for a long time and say we have an hour..

Karlis · Post by **Karlis** » 10 Nov 2005, 19:30

I join the worshipping group of n00bs and say: GREAT WR

, grats Tomas

...I knew it was coming after seeing that close-to-wr time in lauta

Luther · Post by **Luther** » 10 Nov 2005, 21:04

thank you beloved

The_BoneLESS · Post by **The_BoneLESS** » 11 Nov 2005, 01:01

Luther wrote:
The_BoneLESS wrote:I would like to have a Jaws under 1 minute replay using no bounce...
wtf all this jaws-hype, don't play jaws - it sax :X

I understand that now

Luther · Post by **Luther** » 11 Nov 2005, 02:34

he, he =) I bet u do :*

Crazy · Post by **Crazy** » 12 Nov 2005, 09:52

http://www.kopaka.dk/ <--

I guess there are things in the scene that are not meant to be revealed..

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 12 Nov 2005, 09:59

Crazy wrote:http://www.kopaka.dk/ <--

I guess there are things in the scene that are not meant to be revealed..

Haha, kopaka won't fall in the trap. He knows the secret.

John · Post by **John** » 18 Nov 2005, 00:51

made some .99 time today ;X

Luther · Post by **Luther** » 18 Nov 2005, 03:02

dont say its headbanger u NEGER ;XXX

Jazka · Post by **Jazka** » 18 Nov 2005, 07:19

It must be turnaround, bowling or headbanger.... or uphill battle

(maybe not)

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 18 Nov 2005, 07:24

Warm up ofcourse.

CaeZar · Post by **CaeZar** » 18 Nov 2005, 08:01

Quick Round?

Would be fucking mega maxnice!

John · Post by **John** » 18 Nov 2005, 08:58

hihi ur wrong, nat that special time really :X missed 0.4 sec better runs

Rasken · Post by **Rasken** » 18 Nov 2005, 09:31

I guess its upside down or tricks abound

Schumi · Post by **Schumi** » 18 Nov 2005, 10:24

my tips: headbanger, jaws, double trouble, or maybe ramp frenzy???

ead · Post by **ead** » 18 Nov 2005, 11:59

omg john is crazy <3 i hope we see the rec

infected · Post by **infected** » 18 Nov 2005, 15:08

John wrote:hihi ur wrong, nat that special time really :X missed 0.4 sec better runs

ez WU than :>

Dynamo · Post by **Dynamo** » 19 Nov 2005, 00:49

umm i guess its.....Bowling 100%

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 19 Nov 2005, 12:01

Perhaps it's hi flyer. Would be cool.

OtorK · Post by **OtorK** » 19 Nov 2005, 12:07

It must be Jaws or Bowling (maybe AH?

)

Schumi · Post by **Schumi** » 19 Nov 2005, 15:28

John: what is the texture of the level you made the WR on? Do that .5 sec better!

Kopaka · Post by **Kopaka** » 20 Nov 2005, 11:42

..maybe it's not even wr :)

8-ball · Post by **8-ball** » 20 Nov 2005, 15:01

Jaws, ez

berhabdul · Post by **berhabdul** » 20 Nov 2005, 19:16

i made wr nowhere

CaeZar · Post by **CaeZar** » 20 Nov 2005, 19:52

Hehe you think he missed 43:6x runs at Headbanger?

Upside or Bowling sounds like the right answer of this talk..

petsen · Post by **petsen** » 20 Nov 2005, 19:56

43.xx at headbanger would be nice

CaeZar · Post by **CaeZar** » 20 Nov 2005, 21:18

Ye really nice.. But really hard too

Luthers time is incredible

petsen · Post by **petsen** » 20 Nov 2005, 22:09

ye.. i just made it to 45 dunno how.. trying the fast pipe entry now.. hoping to get results

Phillip · Post by **Phillip** » 21 Nov 2005, 15:27

CaeZar wrote:Hehe you think he missed 43:6x runs at Headbanger?

Headbanger is a good guess I think. (Could be several levs though)

CaeZar · Post by **CaeZar** » 21 Nov 2005, 18:06

Nah i dont think so.. Look Luthers rec and try do 40/100 better.. Seems like almost impossible without some help from cheating-program..

jaytea · Post by **jaytea** » 21 Nov 2005, 20:33

ez possible. headbanger is my guess too

infected · Post by **infected** » 21 Nov 2005, 20:47

CaeZar wrote:Nah i dont think so.. Look Luthers rec and try do 40/100 better.. Seems like almost impossible without some help from cheating-program..

ez possible with new styles

Dynamo · Post by **Dynamo** » 21 Nov 2005, 21:42

ya im sure a fat style could be applied to the ending somehow...maybe but i would go apeshit if someone pulled 43 mid on HB oh wow!

petsen · Post by **petsen** » 21 Nov 2005, 22:15

if headbanger goes under 44 ill write "sickest wr ever" on my butt and upload the photo of it.. there now thats a promise!

John · Post by **John** » 21 Nov 2005, 22:16

u all will be disappointed after all those crazy suggestions ;/

ead · Post by **ead** » 21 Nov 2005, 22:48

cant dissapoint me at a big improvement like that

Jake · Post by **Jake** » 21 Nov 2005, 23:13

ez for john is liek bowling and jaws =)

ElToto · Post by **ElToto** » 22 Nov 2005, 10:43

Kopaka wrote:..maybe it's not even wr

the topic is "New WR", so...

petsen · Post by **petsen** » 22 Nov 2005, 12:35

maybe circ ??

Dynamo · Post by **Dynamo** » 22 Nov 2005, 13:35

nah that would be ridiculous...new style required for that most likely

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 22 Nov 2005, 18:05

i guess turna

petsen · Post by **petsen** » 26 Nov 2005, 13:23

hopefully we'll find out tomorrow... records too hopefully

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 27 Nov 2005, 00:04

omfg the waiting was worth it

Dynamo · Post by **Dynamo** » 27 Nov 2005, 02:20

Ya definitly...John for GAA Internalist

Schumi · Post by **Schumi** » 27 Nov 2005, 09:08

Schumi wrote:my tips: headbanger, jaws, double trouble, or maybe ramp frenzy???

I won

btw nice times! grats to all! But now, which is the shorter level, Flat Track or Hill Legend?

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 27 Nov 2005, 10:46

i remember that anyone said (i think i read that it was zweq) that under 1:24 in double trouble is as possible as enigma under 19

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 28 Nov 2005, 10:03

more like 1.22 is as ez as 20