When will the WR TT be under 36?!
Moderator: Moporators
The limit wont be reach for years, depending on your definition of the limit. I think we will be able to tell the limit when the current almost linear trend in the fall in wrtt's (on a monthly basis) suddenly changes gradient by a large amount, and the limit will be around that time. If your definition of the limit is the last wrtt, ie the lowest it'll ever go, that'll take, again depending on too many things to be accurate, between 5-50 years. I know phillip you think that the exponential decay graph e^-x + a where a is the limit is the best model. It usually is for things in nature (ie some kind of exp graph). But there are many things, for example the rate at which we are able to make things smaller, where the graph is more shaped like: \_ ie a very sharp change in the linear pattern. If this is the case for elma, it's almost impossible to tell when the _ will hit.
I am a Flying Spaghetti Monsterian. My God has noodly appendage. The reduction in pirates is the cause of global warming.
-
- Kuski
- Posts: 41
- Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 22:17
- Location: Cananada
- Contact:
- Juski
- Kuski
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: 26 Dec 2003, 20:53
- Location: irc://irc.ircnet.org/ranks
Look at Graph 1 and ulll see that predited TT goes on a curve while actual TT is a more straight line so why not under 36??
No regrets
Are you LOST?
Are you LOST?
Straight line is because of "random" variations over shorter time, in the long run (on average) it can't be a straight line.Juski wrote: Look at Graph 1 and ulll see that predited TT goes on a curve while actual TT is a more straight line so why not under 36??
My model is of course not the best model possible, it is actually just the simplest function that has the properties I wanted (it has a limit, and it is steeper in the beginning). A more advanced curve is, of course, possible to create, but it requires more input parameters (seasonal variations, good people who have quit and so on). Therefore it would be much harder to use.
- Juski
- Kuski
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: 26 Dec 2003, 20:53
- Location: irc://irc.ircnet.org/ranks
Phillip wrote:Straight line is because of "random" variations over shorter time, in the long run (on average) it can't be a straight line.Juski wrote: Look at Graph 1 and ulll see that predited TT goes on a curve while actual TT is a more straight line so why not under 36??
My model is of course not the best model possible, it is actually just the simplest function that has the properties I wanted (it has a limit, and it is steeper in the beginning). A more advanced curve is, of course, possible to create, but it requires more input parameters (seasonal variations, good people who have quit and so on). Therefore it would be much harder to use.
I didnt mean it was a absouloutly straight line just a much wider curva, or maybe just a little wider and making under 35 possible, theoreticly.
No regrets
Are you LOST?
Are you LOST?
Well, you have to do some guessing when fitting the curve. I guessed that in the future new styles will have less relative impact on the tt than it has before. Therefore I guessed that the last part of the tt would be more representative, and fitted the curve to this idea.
A more detailed fit would just require more input parameters, and because of all the uncertainties it would probably not give a better prediction anyway
You are of course free to make your own guesses, I don't say my guess is the best...
A more detailed fit would just require more input parameters, and because of all the uncertainties it would probably not give a better prediction anyway
You are of course free to make your own guesses, I don't say my guess is the best...
it's quite useless to represent a mathematical model that only represents a small part of the data. you can as well make a straight line that represents the development even better than these graphs. still if we look at the actual times it is quite clear that it is going down, if nothing dramatic happens like new elma version perhaps. i think under 36 is possible no doubt.
-
"leader status in the Elma against-the-system underground" - Abula
-
IncrElastoMania - Elma Simulation - Browser Game 2020
Elma Imager - Command Line Tool 2020
"leader status in the Elma against-the-system underground" - Abula
-
IncrElastoMania - Elma Simulation - Browser Game 2020
Elma Imager - Command Line Tool 2020
this is the forth time i say this, but it's never been commented on before.
the wr graph is linear, \ when you plot against time instead of wr tables, and will flatten out very quickly, _. ie the graph will look like \_
lets wait another 10 weeks and we'll see.
the wr graph is linear, \ when you plot against time instead of wr tables, and will flatten out very quickly, _. ie the graph will look like \_
lets wait another 10 weeks and we'll see.
I am a Flying Spaghetti Monsterian. My God has noodly appendage. The reduction in pirates is the cause of global warming.
- Juski
- Kuski
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: 26 Dec 2003, 20:53
- Location: irc://irc.ircnet.org/ranks
He refers to the WR TT, not best player TT.Jappe wrote:where did you look thoses records?
moposite says that world top TT is zweq¨s 37.16.34.
or are there some new tables somewhere
http://www.moposite.com/lists/wr_stats/ ... opment.txt
- Juski
- Kuski
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: 26 Dec 2003, 20:53
- Location: irc://irc.ircnet.org/ranks
Mila, i think your wrong, noobs don't know how much playing you need for a WR....
Atleast i didn't know, and i haven't even got more then a SWedish record
Atleast i didn't know, and i haven't even got more then a SWedish record
No regrets
Are you LOST?
Are you LOST?
I will make dates for all old WR tables. Unfortunately we don't all exactly we can easily estimate quite accurate ones. It doesn't matter that much if it's +- one week.
Would be cool to get an update of Phillip's graph.
Would be cool to get an update of Phillip's graph.
40:02,71 (151.) | WCup4: 8. | 3x WR | 3x GAA | 11x FEM | KOM | The History of Elasto Mania (1995-2018)
I've just updated the prediciton graph with the last 30 tables. I just kept the prediction from last time, since it still fits quite nicely towards the end:
Prediction graph
Here is the excel file:
download
I did get the list of (approximate) dates for the tables, and I will definitely fix that too, but later...
Prediction graph
Here is the excel file:
download
I did get the list of (approximate) dates for the tables, and I will definitely fix that too, but later...
Here are the dates of WR tables. About 30 of them are just good guesses.
Code: Select all
1=06.03.00
2=12.03.00
3=18.03.00
4=24.03.00
5=30.03.00
6=01.04.00
7=06.04.00
8=09.04.00
9=15.04.00
10=18.04.00
11=22.04.00
12=25.04.00
13=28.04.00
14=01.05.00
15=07.05.00
16=14.05.00
17=21.05.00
18=24.05.00
19=27.05.00
20=04.06.00
21=11.06.00
22=17.06.00
23=25.06.00
24=01.07.00
25=09.07.00
26=11.07.00
27=17.07.00
28=23.07.00
29=30.07.00
30=04.08.00
31=06.08.00
32=13.08.00
33=20.08.00
34=25.08.00
35=03.09.00
36=10.09.00
37=18.09.00
38=24.09.00
39=02.10.00
40=08.10.00
41=15.10.00
42=22.10.00
43=29.10.00
44=02.11.00
45=12.11.00
46=19.11.00
47=26.11.00
48=03.12.00
49=10.12.00
50=17.12.00
51=07.01.01
52=14.01.01
53=21.01.01
54=28.01.01
55=04.02.01
56=11.02.01
57=18.02.01
58=25.02.01
59=03.03.01
60=08.03.01
61=18.03.01
62=25.03.01
63=01.04.01
64=08.04.01
65=22.04.01
66=05.05.01
67=14.05.01
68=27.05.01
69=10.06.01
70=24.06.01
71=08.07.01
72=22.07.01
73=05.08.01
74=23.09.01
75=21.10.01
76=18.11.01
77=02.12.01
78=10.01.02
79=17.01.02
80=04.02.02
81=24.02.02
82=17.03.02
83=07.04.02
84=28.04.02
85=19.05.02
86=12.05.02
87=02.06.02
88=30.06.02
89=28.07.02
90=18.08.02
91=25.08.02
92=01.09.02
93=08.09.02
94=15.09.02
95=22.09.02
96=06.10.02
97=13.10.02
98=20.10.02
99=27.10.02
100=03.11.02
101=10.11.02
102=17.11.02
103=24.11.02
104=01.12.02
105=08.12.02
106=28.12.02
107=05.01.03
108=12.01.03
109=19.01.03
110=26.01.03
111=02.02.03
112=09.02.03
113=16.02.03
114=23.02.03
115=02.03.03
116=09.03.03
117=14.03.03
118=16.03.03
119=24.03.03
120=30.03.03
121=06.04.03
122=13.04.03
123=20.04.03
124=27.04.03
125=04.05.03
126=11.05.03
127=18.05.03
128=25.05.03
129=01.06.03
130=09.06.03
131=15.06.03
132=22.06.03
133=29.06.03
134=06.07.03
135=14.07.03
136=24.07.03
137=27.07.03
138=05.08.03
139=10.08.03
140=17.08.03
141=24.08.03
142=31.08.03
143=07.09.03
144=14.09.03
145=21.09.03
146=28.09.03
147=05.10.03
148=11.10.03
149=19.10.03
150=26.10.03
151=02.11.03
152=09.11.03
153=23.11.03
154=01.12.03
155=12.12.03
156=21.12.03
157=05.01.04
158=12.01.04
159=18.01.04
160=25.01.04
161=03.02.04
162=09.02.04
163=15.02.04
164=29.02.04
165=08.03.04
166=14.03.04
167=21.03.04
168=04.04.04
169=11.04.04
170=18.04.04
171=26.04.04
172=02.05.04
173=09.05.04
174=16.05.04
175=30.05.04
176=16.06.04
177=28.06.04
178=25.07.04
179=15.08.04
180=30.08.04
181=06.09.04
182=12.09.04
183=21.09.04
184=26.09.04
185=03.10.04
186=10.10.04
187=19.10.04
188=24.10.04
189=31.10.04
190=07.11.04
191=14.11.04
192=21.11.04
193=28.11.04
194=05.12.04
195=12.12.04
196=05.01.05
197=16.01.05
198=24.01.05
199=30.01.05
200=06.02.05
201=13.02.05
202=20.02.05
203=06.03.05
204=14.03.05
205=20.03.05
206=04.04.05
207=10.04.05
208=17.04.05
209=24.04.05
210=01.05.05
211=08.05.05
212=15.05.05
213=26.06.05
214=03.07.05
215=27.07.05
216=14.08.05
217=21.08.05
218=23.08.05
219=11.09.05
220=18.09.05
40:02,71 (151.) | WCup4: 8. | 3x WR | 3x GAA | 11x FEM | KOM | The History of Elasto Mania (1995-2018)
Not yet. But I hope px will fix the old WR table dates in the next update. Actually he only needs to replace one file by this one.dz wrote:Hmm, interesting. Is this somewhere on moposite also?
40:02,71 (151.) | WCup4: 8. | 3x WR | 3x GAA | 11x FEM | KOM | The History of Elasto Mania (1995-2018)
- Grace
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4849
- Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
- Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.
the WR record TT probably will, but i seriously doubt the personal TT will...T0ringe is best player and only just under 37... the WR times are inching closer and closer...
Cyberscore!
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
- Juski
- Kuski
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: 26 Dec 2003, 20:53
- Location: irc://irc.ircnet.org/ranks
jaksta ppl doubted it would be under 39mins, now there is a person under 37tt, so why wouldnt he be able to do under 36tt too?
No regrets
Are you LOST?
Are you LOST?
If u look at Luthers Jaws time.. down by 0.51 sec.. Quite a loop there. So i guess A.Harvest or Lab-Pro could go kinda low down.. compared to a 54.sec lvl.
I believe that it will be under 36mins... just can't wait to see the new styles which get it under the 36..
I believe that it will be under 36mins... just can't wait to see the new styles which get it under the 36..
Thorze wrote:I just wanted to make a cool topic like Juish have cool topics..
- Juski
- Kuski
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: 26 Dec 2003, 20:53
- Location: irc://irc.ircnet.org/ranks
Not to mention toringes ramp frenzy, he improved even shorter level with over 1 sec :o
No regrets
Are you LOST?
Are you LOST?
interesting argue about WR TT.. i also think that it might go as low as 36, cause it didn't take much time to get from 37:30 to 36:59.. and there were many styles that people didn't even think about but they were done anyway.. and with few years hoyling lab pro could improve pretty much.. and Zweg's (axxu's, John's) AH style could be hoyled few seconds easily i think.. after all, psy's AH was supposed to be max hoyled but Toringe made 1:26 with same style.. but lets see..
I think it will never reach it. Maybe the 36:2x.xx can be possibel if Balazs think out a gift for reaching that TT And if Elasto Mania 2 comes out...
Some time guessing... But without WR replays, its hard to find out the limit on each level... So please share more
Some time guessing... But without WR replays, its hard to find out the limit on each level... So please share more
Code: Select all
1. 14,04
2. 15,12
3. 17,81
4. 29,87
5. 19,94
6. 30,58
7. 32,96
8. 20,87
9. 57,21
10. 11,47
11. 23,44
12. 20,66
13. 15,17
14. 17,66
15. 51,78
16. 1:26,17
17. 54,41
18. 44,47
19. 36,32
20. 59,46
21. 14,46
22. 38,94
23. 36,29
24. 50,97
25. 24,43
26. 22,27
27. 34,76
28. 50,67
29. 43,76
30. 32,96
31. 1:16,61
32. 43,06
33. 58,62
34. 36,58
35. 2:16,31
36. 57,46
37. 53,81
38. 29,21
29. 39,64
40. 1:23,72
41. 39,11
42. 47,34
43. 56,81
44. 11,49
45. 32,60
46. 52,76 -> is that possibel????
47. 19,14
48. 45,91
49. 38,41
50. 53,60
51. 42,97
52. 24,73
53. 17,21
54. 1:25,77
========
TT: 36:31.79
Elasto Mania - 34:21.69 | #421 - 11. April 2024
Ancient Internals
Ancient Internals
id be more interested in reading estimates from ppl who arent so noob. for example, ff 11.49? in your dreams. you cant just subtract a random amount of hundrendths of a second to predict these limits, in fact its almost impossible to do so since that would involve considering the best possible style for each level.. we may not know them alllSchumi wrote:I think it will never reach it. Maybe the 36:2x.xx can be possibel if Balazs think out a gift for reaching that TT And if Elasto Mania 2 comes out...
Some time guessing... But without WR replays, its hard to find out the limit on each level... So please share more
Code: Select all
1. 14,04 2. 15,12 3. 17,81 4. 29,87 5. 19,94 6. 30,58 7. 32,96 8. 20,87 9. 57,21 10. 11,47 11. 23,44 12. 20,66 13. 15,17 14. 17,66 15. 51,78 16. 1:26,17 17. 54,41 18. 44,47 19. 36,32 20. 59,46 21. 14,46 22. 38,94 23. 36,29 24. 50,97 25. 24,43 26. 22,27 27. 34,76 28. 50,67 29. 43,76 30. 32,96 31. 1:16,61 32. 43,06 33. 58,62 34. 36,58 35. 2:16,31 36. 57,46 37. 53,81 38. 29,21 29. 39,64 40. 1:23,72 41. 39,11 42. 47,34 43. 56,81 44. 11,49 45. 32,60 46. 52,76 -> is that possibel???? 47. 19,14 48. 45,91 49. 38,41 50. 53,60 51. 42,97 52. 24,73 53. 17,21 54. 1:25,77 ======== TT: 36:31.79
- Grace
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4849
- Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
- Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.
but think, it went under 37 personal in March...and t0ringe is how much farther down to 36 now...under 2 seconds..Juski wrote:jaksta ppl doubted it would be under 39mins, now there is a person under 37tt, so why wouldnt he be able to do under 36tt too?
Cyberscore!
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
-
- Kuski
- Posts: 86
- Joined: 3 Jul 2005, 18:46
- Location: Cardiff, Wales
But T0r hasn't been playing much in the last year I don't think.jaksta wrote:but think, it went under 37 personal in March...and t0ringe is how much farther down to 36 now...under 2 seconds..Juski wrote:jaksta ppl doubted it would be under 39mins, now there is a person under 37tt, so why wouldnt he be able to do under 36tt too?
The WR TT has gone down to 36:4low. And there are still alot of places to improve. Even tag, which many thought was near the limit, has had a new end style invented which could take it to a 20.8x or 7.x (apparently). It will happen one day if people keep playing. Whether an individual will ever do it is a different question....I suppose eventually they are bound too. might take about 7years though
- Grace
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4849
- Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
- Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.
you might be..
Cyberscore!
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
-
- Kuski
- Posts: 86
- Joined: 3 Jul 2005, 18:46
- Location: Cardiff, Wales
i tell ya all long levels(50sec+) ive played for wr, can be 1sec~ better. every single ride contains flaws. you can merge 100 recs and put all best parts together and get perfect wrs, human just cant drive em :(. im getting very convinced under 36 tt is possible but it will take still a lot of time, just gotta hope still some people keep playing to see what happens.
- Grace
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4849
- Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
- Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.
when elma 2 comes out i will continue playing this game....i like the original more than the thought of a new version..
Cyberscore!
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
The improvements made in the last couple of months have been roughly equal to those made in the seven months before that. In other words, elma world records are a far too complex phenomenon to predict with any sort of accuracy. Obviously there is some theoretical lower limit for how good the total time can be, but in practice there's always something to improve. Whether the total time ever goes below 36 depends mostly on the amount of revitalization and deflation that takes place among all the potential world record drivers. Who knows, maybe we'll see some sort of big, huge internal level playing renaissance? It's not particularly likely, sure, but it could happen.
I think the limit is around 36:12.xx
Elasto Mania - 34:21.69 | #421 - 11. April 2024
Ancient Internals
Ancient Internals