Ok before you guys get mad I'm not really serious with this topic it's more of a fun brainteaser sort of thing. Before you write off the question at all here are some very interesting pieces of evidence to suggest it is true...
1) zarapTOR. TORinge. some kind of secret clue he set up for us to follow?
2) zaraptor comes from same hometown as MJXII. there are thousands of towns in England, and yet so few elma players. what are the chances that 2 guys with TT under 42 would both be from same town? Even MORE interesting is that Toringe is really good friends with MJXII, so he would probably know the name of this town very well.
3) Tor was out of the scene for a while. Zaraptor didn't send his times to moposite either. Same week that Tor comes back and does 3 WRs, zaraptor does like 40 new times or something?? Coincidence !!??!?!!?
4) zaraptor is extremely fucking good. he has battleskills much greater than you would expect from somebody who has played for such a short period of time. these skills, however, would easily be demonstrated by Tor.
5) zaraptor has not met up with MJXII even though they apparently live like 15 mins away from each other. when you consider how rare it is for UK kuskis to even exist, surely he would pounce on the opportunity?
6) maybe MJXII asked Tor to set up phantom nick to make sure i don't become UK #1 ?
7) maybe Tor set up phantom nick to get lazy MJXII to improve quicker?
[OMG] | [SpEF] | Apparently my TT was once 39:26:06
btw, as regards #6: There has never been any danger of you being UK#1. If zaraptor wasn't there I would have sent in my times more often to keep you from being the best
Ok before you guys get mad I'm not really serious with this topic it's more of a fun brainteaser sort of thing. Before you write off the question at all here are some very interesting pieces of evidence to suggest it is true...
So i don't get why some guys even get annoyed this was very funney to read.
how did zarapTOR battle in #battle while toringe was at his parents and didn't have internet access?
Were you ever at his parents and see him not have acces to internet?? That would be perfect opportunity to get new IRC adress.
Actually, zaraptor ain't that new...maybe to the scene but i remember he was in all OoK! contests and made some serious times in them...that was maybe a year ago, don't really remember
Pretty sure zaraptor is just very talented and improves pretty fast, just like you Sierra... you could be zaraptor too
Website ||TT:38:05:33|| WC5:15th ||HHIT for life || 9th world wide ... BAP is next
Another thing... When I arranged LOS CUP 2 about a year ago, there were 10 rounds. zaraptor only participated in the first round, and t0r only participated in last round! Coincidence? I think this: not.
Isn't it quite easy to figure out? if zaraptor is from uk and t0r from norway, just check IRC host adresses. 1-2-3 and you see he's nat t0r.
And sierre, take it ez boy boy, no need to get angrey. When newer players get's better than you it can get frustating, I know, but you just have to deal with it, that is freaking how everythings is!!!1!11111oneone
Sierra, you are taking this game to serious.. yeah, I know what you wrote up there ^, but it isn't bad to be the 2:nd best UK Kuski ore even the 3:rd best...
when do mods enter this and ban cuz of disturbing/offensive language? Sierra doesn't use a language that fits in here. I've seen Abula delete texts that has been less offensive.
ARTISTRY is in the eye of the Beholder -||- TT Höylä Mission: 10.48.43 -||- Best Times: Tutorial1 -||- höylä
Maybe you should all stop guessing how others are feeling. I know zaraptor found this funny. And why should Toringe care at all, zaraptor and I are both nobodies to him. You act as though this is a direct insult to both of them; frankly, it's more of a compliment. And anyone who genuinely thinks I care about my placing in the UK tt table obviously doesn't know me very well.
[OMG] | [SpEF] | Apparently my TT was once 39:26:06
sierra, I find your analyse interresting, but nothing more. And nobody should think it's true; it's, in it's form, purely hypothetical.
sierra didn't prove this for himself, so we shouldn't be affected by his unproved thesis. he just illustrated the various points for peepz who wanted to know more about his (...unprobable, or whatever) hypothesis
actually, he has been insulted the first, as far as I can know, but it's true he tried to put on the more points he could (trying to pursue his thesis), even if some (perhaps) weren't of any clear evidence.
anyway, I just wanted to clear things out. maybe I even misunderstood some points.
Briefly, I find every thought interesting, and I think people should continue writing them so that it keeps ... you know, the scene, us ... alive
Edit: What was that first post? You know, fatigue isn't an excuse.
Last edited by twipley on 23 Apr 2005, 03:37, edited 4 times in total.
you're right; nothing's serious, not even the fact that we posted at the same time. maybe I talked too much (oops). j ust look at the clock you see 12:34 too often!
Edit: That second post wasn't even better. Maybe I should stop commenting all my previous posts; I got a life, after all.
Last edited by twipley on 23 Apr 2005, 03:39, edited 1 time in total.
Since its introduction into quantum chemistry in the late 1960s by CÃzek and Paldus coupled cluster theory has emerged as perhaps the most reliable, yet computationally affordable method for the approximate solution of the electronic Schrödinger equation and the prediction of molecular properties. The purpose of this chapter is to provide computational chemists who seek a deeper knowledge of coupled cluster theory with the background necessary to understand the extensive literature on this important ab initio technique.
In spite of the method's present utility and popularity, the quantum chemical community was slow to accept coupled cluster theory, perhaps because the earliest researchers in the field used elegant but unfamiliar mathematical tools such as Feynman-like diagrams and second-quantization to derive working equations. Nearly ten years after the essential contributions of Paldus and CÃzek, Hurley presented a re-derivation of the coupled cluster doubles (CCD) equations in terms which were more familiar to quantum chemists. Soon thereafter Monkhorst developed a general coupled cluster response theory for calculating molecular properties. By the end of the 1970s, computer implementations of the theory for realistic systems began to appear as the groups of Popleand Bartlett each developed and tested spin-orbital CCD programs. A few years later, Purvis and Bartlett derived the coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) equations and implemented them in a practical computer program. Since that pioneering achievement, the popularity of coupled cluster methods has blossomed, and tremendous efforts have been made in the construction of highly efficient CCSD energy codes, inclusion of higher excitations in the coupled cluster wavefunction spin-adaptation of open-shell methods, as well as development of analytic first and second energy derivatives, and methods to treat excited states.
In the following section, we will use the cluster function approach developed by Sinanoglu to justify the well-known exponential form of the coupled cluster wavefunction. This task requires use of the mathematical technique known as second-quantization (also called ``occupation-number'' formalism), and we introduce important concepts as they are needed. We then construct the operator equations of coupled cluster theory and address issues such as the Hausdorff expansion, variational approaches, and an eigenvalue perspective on the coupled cluster problem. In the next section, we develop a set of algebraic and diagrammatic tools needed to derive programmable equations for the CCSD method, and, using these tools, we discuss the property of the energy known as size extensivity. Next, we examine the relationship between the coupled cluster equations and those of finite-order many-body perturbation theory, leading to an explanation of the popular (T) correction implemented in many quantum chemical program packages. We then discuss some of the issues associated with an efficient computer implementation of coupled-cluster-like equations, such as matrix formulations, intermediate factorization, spin and spatial symmetry simplifications, and atomic-orbital-based algorithms. Finally, we describe some of the latest developments in the theory, including the implementation of open-shell Brueckner methods, an area of coupled cluster theory which in recent years has proven to be valuable for a number of difficult open-shell symmetry-breaking problems.
We would like to stress that this chapter is a review of coupled cluster theory. It is not primarily intended to provide an analysis of the numerical performance of the coupled cluster model, and we direct readers in search of such information to several recent publications. Instead, we offer a detailed explanation of the most important aspects of coupled cluster theory at a level appropriate for the general computational chemistry community. Although many of the topics described here have been discussed by other authors. this chapter is unique in that it attempts to provide a concise, practical introduction to the mathematical techniques of coupled cluster theory (both algebraic and diagrammatic), as well as a discussion of the efficient implementation of the method on high-performance computers, in a manner accessible to newcomers to the field.
tijsjoris wrote:haeh...most likely. Just as dmd = toringe = zweq like some noob thought long time ago, =)
OMG. I thought they were...
The first joiner of EK. Having the best IQ (ATM) Organized MET2002, 2003 and 2004. Organized EEC. Being active all the time, but not höyling like hell. Like the music that Queen and Stratovarius play. Favourite pages: arzen25.fw.hu www.elastokings.tkwww.elastomania.huwww.moposite.comwww.stratovarius.com
[10:51:18] <skint0r> i could SACh see KyJelly working at ICA ;D
[10:51:37] <skint0r> "vad kostar denna?" "wtf ch0b0" Thursday, March 2nd 2005, 0942 i was 3333 [4.43% of total / 3.25 posts per day]
i thought luther was an anti-social dweeb who spends his life hoyling for times zampper makes with ease, and i thought you were some reject aussie whose parents sent to the other side of the world to get away from you
Maybe you're paranoid? 
You want us to give annoyed reactons to your lousy, faulty statement.
Organized MET2002, 2003 and 2004. Organized EEC. Being active all the time, but not höyling like hell. Like the music that Queen and Stratovarius play. Favourite pages: arzen25.fw.hu 