Noob wr table

Dariuz · Post by **Dariuz** » 23 Jun 2003, 10:04

nice to see the +45 wr table is updated

Stini · Post by **Stini** » 28 Jun 2003, 23:13

Dyrox wrote:The +45 WR Table is updated.
http://hem.passagen.se/dyrox/45/index.htm
http://hem.passagen.se/dyrox/45/New_Stats.htm

Are u happy now Kopaka? You made some nice times... =)

Hmm...I think that I've sent you my state.dat (with over 45 tt) long time ago and there are only 3 of my times. There should be many more...

Juble · Post by **Juble** » 8 Jun 2004, 16:21

queston i have to ask about 50+ table.

Do you have to finish all the levels?

ive got a couple of recs, i have a tt of 1h 3sec with one level skipped

am i allowed to send in my recs?

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 8 Jun 2004, 16:22

you have to finish all levels yes.

chux · Post by **chux** » 9 Jun 2004, 23:47

Eyah, you need a tt by 'Moposites rules' (all levs finished).
But youre Juble, Im sure you have good tt

Ky.Jelly · Post by **Ky.Jelly** » 10 Jun 2004, 05:55

lolz juble tt has always been shit, hes got a couple of kick arse times that will qualify too

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 10 Jun 2004, 18:58

juble will eat the NWR table for breakfast.

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 27 Jul 2004, 15:07

just for my own reference, any anybody who is interested, the new +45WR table is http://home.planet.nl/~groo5305/newbie.html

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 28 Jul 2004, 09:35

I reckon I told that somewhere else too.

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 20 Aug 2004, 22:53

Myself and Jaytea plan to make a +45 Multiplayer WR table. Works just like Multi WR table, except both players must have +45TT.

Good idea? Or another stupid n00b invention?

Well we don't care, because we're making it anyway.

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 21 Aug 2004, 08:50

sierra wrote:Myself and Jaytea plan to make a +45 Multiplayer WR table. Works just like Multi WR table, except both players must have +45TT.

Good idea? Or another stupid n00b invention?

Well we don't care, because we're making it anyway.

i think thats a very goog idea!!!!!!!

Juski · Post by **Juski** » 21 Aug 2004, 09:01

Ye but how often does 2 players have all their times on 1 state? It will be way to easy to cheat this one.

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 21 Aug 2004, 11:42

Thanks Lukazz! Also thanks to Thor who expressed his approval in a PM.

Juski: Yea cheating is something I'm concerned about, but times will need to be fully authentic to make it on the table, don't worry.

kinghias · Post by **kinghias** » 21 Aug 2004, 12:17

quite a nice idea, but hurry up boys or i'll get under 45

JeMsTaR · Post by **JeMsTaR** » 22 Aug 2004, 10:02

hee hee, three 50+ NWRs

Post by **SveinR** » 23 Aug 2004, 17:15

sierra wrote:Myself and Jaytea plan to make a +45 Multiplayer WR table. Works just like Multi WR table, except both players must have +45TT.

Good idea? Or another stupid n00b invention?

Well we don't care, because we're making it anyway.

Well you would need both player's own states as well as the state they set the multi wr on.. Dunno if people will see it as too much work.

Anyway, don't listen to me, I'm pretty negative to all this +XX wr lists thing anyway.

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 23 Aug 2004, 22:57

yea SveinR but most people would get the record on one of the individuals' states wouldn't they? i know i wouldn't bother setting up a new state.dat just for multiplay.

and yes i guess there is some 'red tape' issues but, people will go through quite a lot of effort to get their names on tables

Luther · Post by **Luther** » 24 Aug 2004, 09:44

omg realised when I watched this thread that I had a "wr" (or whatever it is) on DT (1.29.28) which is so omg old, but since u made a "new" 45+ table... doesn't my time count or what?

just curious, i have no idea how this works

Tantal · Post by **Tantal** » 24 Aug 2004, 10:34

I think it would be much better if you made some table based on their combined tt instead of single tt. A persons skill in multiplaying doesn't necessarily have to be the same as his skill in normal single play, though there is some connection of course.
With this system you could keep playing multiplayer until you get really good and still get into the table because your single tt won't go down if you just play multi. I'm not sure if that'll be a big problem though.

The point is I think using the combined tt would be best because it reflects your multiplaying skills better. Of course there might be some problems if you're using combined tt too...

I'm sorry if I sound very negative. New ideas are always great, keep 'em coming

Jonas · Post by **Jonas** » 24 Aug 2004, 13:11

I have the original +45 WR table on my old computer and when i checked it it was many times on that one that are better then the current +45 WR table, how the did that happen??...did you just make a new WR table without checking the old one??...the one who have the current +45 WR table can contact me if he wants the old table so he can put in those records as well, cause the people who has them deserves them

...

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 24 Aug 2004, 13:19

Jonas can we see the old table?

And Tantal, wouldn't combined TT make it easy for pro hoylas to just own the table? Toringe, for example, could pair up with, i dunno, his cousin who has a +60 tt and take a lot of records. My thinking is that if both players are +45 then hopefully they're still quite noob.

Luther · Post by **Luther** » 24 Aug 2004, 13:22

[12:48:22] <Jonas--> http://vk0.dk/vkprivupload/briijzve/45WRTable.htm
[12:48:28] <Jonas--> thereÂ´s the old table

ok nat work dame, i shouldve saved it ;S

Juski · Post by **Juski** » 24 Aug 2004, 14:36

sierra wrote:Jonas can we see the old table?

And Tantal, wouldn't combined TT make it easy for pro hoylas to just own the table? Toringe, for example, could pair up with, i dunno, his cousin who has a +60 tt and take a lot of records. My thinking is that if both players are +45 then hopefully they're still quite noob.

i think the both players multi TT. but its rarely someone plays all levs in multi player, at least i dont.

Post by **SveinR** » 24 Aug 2004, 15:07

Tantal wrote:I think it would be much better if you made some table based on their combined tt instead of single tt.

Well, and I guess I would know, quite few kuskis have very hoyled times on all multi levs. Many have just hoyled a few of them in multi and haven't played the others at all (not on the state anyway). So that would make for a very bad combined TT.

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 24 Aug 2004, 18:46

OK, Jonas don't blame me for this shit happening to 45+ cause I just took over from Revolt, and didn't seem to know any link to yours. If you have some stuff like replays and more and times and shit send me to my email
which is tijsjoris at planet dot nl

Tantal · Post by **Tantal** » 25 Aug 2004, 11:45

And Tantal, wouldn't combined TT make it easy for pro hoylas to just own the table? Toringe, for example, could pair up with, i dunno, his cousin who has a +60 tt and take a lot of records. My thinking is that if both players are +45 then hopefully they're still quite noob.

TorInge's combined total wouldn't get any worse if he played with someone else who has worse tt. Your combined total goes down if you make a better time in multiplayer nomatter who you play with.

Still I realize that using combined tt wouldn't work that well afterall, because there are so many players that have played only a few levels in multi player.
They wouldn't be able to completely rule the table though, because when they get too many records, their combined tt would be too good.

Maybe having limits for both normal tt and combined tt would work...

J-sim · Post by **J-sim** » 25 Aug 2004, 12:31

Or maybe just making a 'non zweq-juzam-tantal-toringe table' would work

JeMsTaR · Post by **JeMsTaR** » 1 Oct 2004, 11:52

lol i just took the bokhylle (or watever's) 45+ NWR on lab pro
BOOYAH!

Noob wr table

asd

asd