Replays sharing

western · Post by **western** » 24 Nov 2008, 03:29

http://www.moposite.com/downloads_repla ... sional.php
I've just noticed that this is missing some of the newer ones.

Mawane · Post by **Mawane** » 27 Nov 2008, 05:54

for omg

Dyrox · Post by **Dyrox** » 27 Nov 2008, 11:26

I'm looking for an 1.04 - 1.06 Upside Down rec.

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 27 Nov 2008, 20:36

pawq asked for some sub50 rec.

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 27 Nov 2008, 20:48

thx again luki

Mawane · Post by **Mawane** » 28 Nov 2008, 04:01

[08/11/27 21:58:00] <@temp_server> *************** Battle in botch567.lev by Mawane over ***************
[08/11/27 21:58:01] <@temp_server> 1. Snadle 4:32
[08/11/27 21:58:02] <@temp_server> 2. OMG 7:85
[08/11/27 21:58:02] <@temp_server> 3. Magb 8:15
[08/11/27 21:58:03] <@temp_server> 4. Koopa 8:22
[08/11/27 21:58:04] <@temp_server> 5. Mawane 8:55
[08/11/27 21:58:07] <@temp_server> 6. Bismuth 8:67
[08/11/27 21:58:09] <@temp_server> 7. BoneLESS 8:77
[08/11/27 21:58:10] <@temp_server> 8. Johnny 9:40
[08/11/27 21:58:12] <@temp_server> 9. Dareth 1 apple
[08/11/27 21:58:14] <@temp_server> *************** End of results ***************

does this rec shows xiited?

Bismuth · Post by **Bismuth** » 28 Nov 2008, 04:35

No, only bugbounce

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 28 Nov 2008, 08:29

looks like he plays flag tag in multiplayer mode
EDIT: no, can't be... very strange

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 28 Nov 2008, 10:45

upside down WC target without long jump

Xiphias · Post by **Xiphias** » 28 Nov 2008, 12:42

Lukazz wrote:looks like he plays flag tag in multiplayer mode
EDIT: no, can't be... very strange

it is multiplayer mode

he told me himself.. he changed the singleplayer mode with multiplayer =)

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 28 Nov 2008, 12:46

haha lol xD

anpdad · Post by **anpdad** » 28 Nov 2008, 14:35

Thought i'd throw my 1:01 without a longjump either. Don't remember whether i shared it or not. Got it while testing a hangtrick, was quite easy to get btw

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 28 Nov 2008, 15:04

The_BoneLESS · Post by **The_BoneLESS** » 28 Nov 2008, 16:29

anpdad, that's some seriously sick style.
and it does look easier than hang style.

Xiphias · Post by **Xiphias** » 28 Nov 2008, 16:41

yeah old style =) was that the multistyle?

anyways.. I tried it this time.. with 5 tries I finally made it

I've never managed the other style
Just improved my time with 2 seconds ^^

Snadle · Post by **Snadle** » 29 Nov 2008, 14:38

Ello again. Yes, I accidentally made it think I was playing multiplayer flag tag while playing singleplayer (or multiplayer no-flag tag). I found something else that I shared with Fractangle and Mawane.

New WR styles O_O below!

Edit: A narb Hangman style added.

Snadle · Post by **Snadle** » 29 Nov 2008, 14:59

And here's an alternate Hang Tight style, 0.36 better than the current WR :O

And here is Upside Down Xiphias style.

And this is the real way to start Pipe.

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 29 Nov 2008, 15:36

two upside down recs, one with long jump (1.01.39) one without (1.01.88)

western · Post by **western** » 29 Nov 2008, 15:37

sure it's nitro (infinite volts).
but I wonder if the right pole of 20 was actually lower, if that style would actually be faster

[edit Lukazz recs aren't nitroed]
put the same amount of time under 1:00 than over it and you're near WR, my dear...

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 29 Nov 2008, 16:24

lol he has slower recs even with nitro. what a nab

Snadle · Post by **Snadle** » 29 Nov 2008, 16:48

Not even nitro. Nitro's much slower in volting.

I fooled around in the exe file and made it so that you do 1 volt per frame. So vsync & fps limiter would have a big effect on what was done.

Xiphias · Post by **Xiphias** » 2 Dec 2008, 04:37

we have all seen akb's 10.3x steppes screenshot..

maybe this style is ezzer than his spinalot fake shit talk screenshot time style

western · Post by **western** » 2 Dec 2008, 04:51

nice! I'd see it with an alo at 7,60 though /2 cents one cup

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 2 Dec 2008, 10:08

looks nice but i think there is a 2nd way to get 10.30

Johann · Post by **Johann** » 2 Dec 2008, 15:50

New Quick Round style

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 2 Dec 2008, 16:00

nice, ez 35? :O

Palme · Post by **Palme** » 2 Dec 2008, 16:37

I need the fastest sink rec i can get

i also want to know best fps for that lev, was it 60?

thanks in advance!

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 2 Dec 2008, 16:50

http://up.k10x.net/fjnsxjskisnfu/45z3253.rec

Ves · Post by **Ves** » 2 Dec 2008, 17:04

Lukazz wrote:nice, ez 35? :O

It's already ez 35 with old style

adi · Post by **adi** » 2 Dec 2008, 17:50

Johann wrote:New Quick Round style

Cool. I hoyled that style some months ago in train lev and got 0,12 faster time (old style hoyled to teh max). Anyway feels way too hard to try in real lev.

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 2 Dec 2008, 17:55

Xiphias wrote:we have all seen akb's 10.3x steppes screenshot..

i havent, could someone reup it?
quick round style looks veery fast, when i merged those two recs new one was like 20s faster but also a bit messed up
so -0,3s with only ending?

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 2 Dec 2008, 18:05

no elma, could someone describe that quick round style please? :x

Cap · Post by **Cap** » 2 Dec 2008, 18:06

35 ez

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 2 Dec 2008, 18:10

Igge wrote:no elma, could someone describe that quick round style please?

http://trouvedec.free.fr/runreplay

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 2 Dec 2008, 18:16

well, no computer either, and java problem at this nab school comp im using atm.

ah well, i can always watch it when i get a new comp

adi · Post by **adi** » 2 Dec 2008, 18:45

Hmm, decided to try again. 13,93 with new style and 14,20 with old.

Johann · Post by **Johann** » 3 Dec 2008, 01:15

cool, btw i think my brutal hoyled is faster..

Memphis · Post by **Memphis** » 3 Dec 2008, 08:00

sick style. ez shave some time off wr. not sure how that style wasn't thought of before.

zyntifox · Post by **zyntifox** » 3 Dec 2008, 11:55

Johann wrote:here's is when you say: shit

Sorry Johann, but still pretty far off. Right style for taking WR, but cutting that much air from the first apples "saves" alot of time. Your start is also slightly sloppy. The problem I think though, that getting a smooth start with low refresh rate is quite hard, but getting a bounce with high refresh rate is even harder. Hoyl after this (http://up.k10x.net/theorxrykyqmw/08zynt.rec). Btw, the time you save from bouncing back is overestimated, but yeah, it saves time.

I reckon this WR will be beaten soon enough anyway. Good luck

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 3 Dec 2008, 14:16

strange rec, start is great but end looks very slow o_O

western · Post by **western** » 3 Dec 2008, 15:50

you're kidding. start was like "omg," end was like "wtf." thanks for sharing, though!|

FinMan · Post by **FinMan** » 3 Dec 2008, 15:51

western wrote:you're kidding. start was like "omg," end was like "wtf."

You are nabbing. End was like "YEAAHSS!!! UNDER 15 IN WU!!!"...

western · Post by **western** » 3 Dec 2008, 15:54

Memphis wrote:not sure how that style wasn't thought of before.

let's just hope this quote happen more and more often...

Johann · Post by **Johann** » 3 Dec 2008, 16:33

zyntifox wrote:
Johann wrote:here's is when you say: shit
Sorry Johann, but still pretty far off. Right style for taking WR, but cutting that much air from the first apples "saves" alot of time. Your start is also slightly sloppy. The problem I think though, that getting a smooth start with low refresh rate is quite hard, but getting a bounce with high refresh rate is even harder. Hoyl after this (http://up.k10x.net/theorxrykyqmw/08zynt.rec). Btw, the time you save from bouncing back is overestimated, but yeah, it saves time.

I reckon this WR will be beaten soon enough anyway. Good luck

Thanks zynti, I know that start is not fast, and the missed apple saved time, but it was a random ride, now i make excellent starts and it's as fast as the missed run, so it's ez wr with that end...

zyntifox · Post by **zyntifox** » 3 Dec 2008, 16:53

Lukazz wrote:strange rec, start is great but end looks very slow o_O

The end is better than it looks. Great curve and close to optimal turning. Do some merging and see for yourself (the end is actually faster than Johanns end from what I've seen. Watched only once though so might be mistaken).

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 3 Dec 2008, 17:01

zyntifox wrote:
Lukazz wrote:strange rec, start is great but end looks very slow o_O
The end is better than it looks. Great curve and close to optimal turning. Do some merging and see for yourself (the end is actually faster than Johanns end from what I've seen. Watched only once though so might be mistaken).

ye i noticed that too. i was really surprised that it was faster than t0r's end, which looks totally awesome in comparison with yours

western · Post by **western** » 4 Dec 2008, 01:15

zyntifox wrote:I reckon this WR will be beaten soon enough anyway.

Well, if that happens, I'll be missing that little bee...

jaytea · Post by **jaytea** » 5 Dec 2008, 04:18

for CMc, my greatest friend..

http://up.k10x.net/fxnlbhvkvtlii/recs.zip

western · Post by **western** » 5 Dec 2008, 04:51

omg, jt, didn't know you played internals...

CMc · Post by **CMc** » 5 Dec 2008, 15:29

I still have tears.