Replays sharing

Dash · Post by **Dash** » 4 Sep 2009, 18:35

Better Madx027 rec by me, for Madness

Edit: Madx027 even better

Madness · Post by **Madness** » 4 Sep 2009, 23:11

Nice !

I wonder if it's possible to go to the left directly..

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 6 Sep 2009, 20:18

[7:44pm] <teh_mila> http://up.k10x.net/ajudaxsxajjng/n06ma.rec damez, flower was 30.35

_FreaK_ · Post by **_FreaK_** » 6 Sep 2009, 21:57

oh my gosh... thats what i call unlucky

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 7 Sep 2009, 06:01

milagros wrote:[7:44pm] <teh_mila> http://up.k10x.net/ajudaxsxajjng/n06ma.rec damez, flower was 30.35

pls do a 29 :-*

Tm · Post by Tm » 7 Sep 2009, 15:49

Time to share i guess..
And 33.16 is done without annoying turning, so those who nabs at that point of level might want to try it, nothing new with it anyways.
If any of kuskis will try to beat wr, contact me, i may give some more recs for merging and little details, might be useful. Peace.

kinghias · Post by **kinghias** » 8 Sep 2009, 00:18

very nice, clean run!

pipe was the only internal ever i was really hooked on and that i thought i could do well. i tried to take wr every now and then for several years but nowadays i'm not even getting close to sub 33 anymore. bad tuning i guess ;P

Pab · Post by **Pab** » 15 Sep 2009, 23:19

Bumpy 42.38 Left start

i make ok ride soon, no time now

The_BoneLESS · Post by **The_BoneLESS** » 23 Sep 2009, 23:00

Battle in MB0083

My head went through the hang a bit too much in my opinion, still didn't die.

Bismuth · Post by **Bismuth** » 23 Sep 2009, 23:29

Thanks Smibu, seems you were VERY lucky on that one Bone, like 1/20 of a head.

Lee · Post by **Lee** » 24 Sep 2009, 05:33

lol, mine is like 1/100 of a head.

Madness · Post by **Madness** » 26 Sep 2009, 13:25

For totem:

totem · Post by **totem** » 26 Sep 2009, 18:19

thank you !

Bjenn · Post by **Bjenn** » 29 Sep 2009, 00:23

I decided to share my Headbanger 43.26

Memphis · Post by **Memphis** » 29 Sep 2009, 00:42

sick bjorn. How is that not faster then wr? I'll have to merge.

Raven · Post by **Raven** » 29 Sep 2009, 03:06

That was fking Awesome Bjorn!

DaFred · Post by **DaFred** » 29 Sep 2009, 13:37

looks like you ez could do wr!

Raven · Post by **Raven** » 29 Sep 2009, 23:43

New style for Labyrinth Pro. Dont know how much faster. At least over 0.5s

Xiphias · Post by **Xiphias** » 29 Sep 2009, 23:55

finally a new trick for that place.. omg took like 9 years ;D looks awesome ;P haven't checked how faster it is though.. but that trick has prestige xD gg raven

edit.. btw why would you share it?

Raven · Post by **Raven** » 30 Sep 2009, 00:04

i don't have patience to hoyl lab pro wr ;s

Xiphias · Post by **Xiphias** » 30 Sep 2009, 01:03

Raven wrote:i don't have patience to hoyl lab pro wr ;s

omg.. and yet you have hoyled nearly all other wrs

what about apple harvest? must be 4,182x more frustrating level than labpro

I think never underestimate the power of random motivation

maybe one day you'll start hoyling and do some nice runs / times and think.. wtf ez wr.. 1 week and wr is mine :O

Bismuth · Post by **Bismuth** » 30 Sep 2009, 03:47

Attachments:
35maybe.lev [9.59 KiB]
Downloaded 15 times
35better.rec [15.28 KiB]
Downloaded 17 times

Looks like there are two nabs there.

Mawane · Post by **Mawane** » 30 Sep 2009, 03:56

i just dloaded rec, ez merge with rel lev

Bismuth · Post by **Bismuth** » 30 Sep 2009, 04:43

oh yeah, right, I am nab then.

Cap · Post by **Cap** » 30 Sep 2009, 11:01

Its Ramone trick actually =) he try it long time ago) but nice one Raven

Xiphias · Post by **Xiphias** » 30 Sep 2009, 11:11

Just wait for Zweq's answer:

Future Zweq wrote:Old nab trick.. been using it for years.

and then

Code: Select all

WRs #301 at 5:21 EEST by px 
Labyrinth Pro
2:14,21 Kazan -> 2:13,35 Zweq

dorTrus · Post by **dorTrus** » 30 Sep 2009, 11:33

Xiphias wrote:Just wait for Zweq's answer:
Future Zweq wrote:Old nab trick.. been using it for years.
and then
Code: Select all
WRs #301 at 5:21 EEST by px 
Labyrinth Pro
2:14,21 Kazan -> 2:13,35 Zweq

You really got ROFL me!!! ))))))))
Your posts are the best on lauta, Xiphias!

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 30 Sep 2009, 12:11

Raven wrote:New style for Labyrinth Pro. Dont know how much faster. At least over 0.5s

not realistic speed in train lev;) but seems ez with more speed also and much faster, max style never seen/thought of before

Raven · Post by **Raven** » 30 Sep 2009, 15:13

I've got Zweq's blessing

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 30 Sep 2009, 16:14

thaets damn impsy for human, even in trainlev

ez run aimbot

really sick try rav. and Bjorn! wtf its not wr?? :<<< looks soooo faster than John's

looks like 2 wrs said to be most impsy (enigma and bangheader) are going (or were going, like enigma (fuuuu your losing motivation Thunder

)) to be beaten

Memphis · Post by **Memphis** » 30 Sep 2009, 23:36

probably saves atleast one second eh?

Pab · Post by **Pab** » 2 Oct 2009, 21:51

Always wanted to hang that loop

Mawane · Post by **Mawane** » 2 Oct 2009, 22:13

you are the new buggy stini

Pab · Post by **Pab** » 2 Oct 2009, 22:51

I found some old bugs i got

2 bugs into the ground o,o and a bartbounce

Bjenn · Post by **Bjenn** » 7 Oct 2009, 17:18

1. fu Pab that 07LulZ.rec is mine you nab.

2. i tried luthar bance in jaws but couldn't get the second bounce so good cause i have more speed than him.

Pab · Post by **Pab** » 8 Oct 2009, 00:21

1.omg me wrong, sry. just found it and had so nab moves that thought it was mine

2.fuck u too

Thunder · Post by **Thunder** » 8 Oct 2009, 07:59

Maybe if i share my rec somebody will have the patient to beat my time in enigma

So here it is finaly:

_FreaK_ · Post by **_FreaK_** » 8 Oct 2009, 09:44

So are you giving up on it? :/ shame

Thunder · Post by **Thunder** » 8 Oct 2009, 10:43

O yes... It was driving me crazy

John · Post by **John** » 8 Oct 2009, 11:48

More buggy than Stini's yet Stini is the one taking all the shit ;(

Boomer · Post by **Boomer** » 8 Oct 2009, 14:37

John wrote:More buggy than Stini's yet Stini is the one taking all the shit ;(

Well, quite obvious isn't it? I mean you can't compare the amount of blame they have taken when Stini's WR-rec is more than five years old. Thunder's rec was driven recently. Though I agree that Stini is not the one to blame for having the WR. He was not the one to decide if it was a bugbounce or not. If Thunder's rec was a few hundreds faster and if they would accept it then I guess some would blame him as well.

Bismuth · Post by **Bismuth** » 8 Oct 2009, 19:01

Well then, I believe it should be changed. I think we should say "Awesome rec, Stini, but sorry, there was a bug" and remove his time from the table. We should simply remove it and put the best non-bug time we have. Because right now, it just seems there is no way this WR will ever be beaten legit. And if we accepted bugs, WRs would go nab. Pipe 28.xx with bug bounce impsy to beat without max luck, Enigma some 19.0x with super-bug time, etc.

My opinion is: remove that 19.16 and have a non-buggy WR on Enigma, is it Zweq's 19.2x or 3x or something, I don't know.

The_BoneLESS · Post by **The_BoneLESS** » 8 Oct 2009, 19:12

The problem Bismuth is how to define a "non-buggy" rec?

Bismuth · Post by **Bismuth** » 8 Oct 2009, 19:37

Well, I guess most are quite obvious, and arguable recs should be submitted to a kind of "poll". One problem is that the rec would be shared, one other problem is that many people don't have any shit idea about it (I count me in). There should be maybe a "bug committee" that would decide if it is buggy and that would tell reasons why, blah blah.

Fredrik · Post by **Fredrik** » 8 Oct 2009, 19:50

isn't the moposite staff already kind of a bug comittee?

John · Post by **John** » 8 Oct 2009, 22:11

Boomer wrote:
John wrote:More buggy than Stini's yet Stini is the one taking all the shit ;(
Well, quite obvious isn't it? I mean you can't compare the amount of blame they have taken when Stini's WR-rec is more than five years old. Thunder's rec was driven recently. Though I agree that Stini is not the one to blame for having the WR. He was not the one to decide if it was a bugbounce or not. If Thunder's rec was a few hundreds faster and if they would accept it then I guess some would blame him as well.

All I've heard ppl saying to Thunder is "come on u can do it!". Not a word about any bugs, like the community gives a fukk if Thunder's time is buggish or nat as long as he beats Stini. If one is to beat Enigma WR legally he should at least reach bouncepart faster than Stini does.

roope · Post by **roope** » 8 Oct 2009, 23:37

For Smaxa's request, my serp 1:00:16

Grace · Post by **Grace** » 8 Oct 2009, 23:37

Thank you very much

<3

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 10 Oct 2009, 12:29

2.57.81 on labby pro without the bounce. actually quite sucky run, i failed at the bounce and drove the nabroute but still the best finished time without sc i think.

Jarkko · Post by **Jarkko** » 10 Oct 2009, 22:46

http://zworqy.com/up/files/08j2078.rec