New WRs

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 7 Mar 2005, 13:16

ofcourse dariuz deserves to have the wr, but ded should have had it for some tables

Post by px » 7 Mar 2005, 13:17

tijsjoris wrote:Later on I realised that the WR made by Ded was apparently 15,19 and not 15,18. So there is simply no dilemma about that. When Ded would've had 15,18, px ofcourse had put up his time, because he was then the first to send a 15,18 in.

Correct.

Post by px » 7 Mar 2005, 13:21

milagros wrote:ofcourse dariuz deserves to have the wr, but ded should have had it for some tables

Yes. For one table, that didn't come up at all, between #202 and #203.

Yet one point. If you look at the rules of WR submitting, one should clearly state what he is sending and who he is. I recieved Ded's WR as a forward email and there he told nothing but his nick. Irrelevant, maybe so, maybe not.

jw · Post by jw » 7 Mar 2005, 13:59

isn't it an option to give ded one week a record at #203 and make a new #204 for Dariuz for this week, just a little creativity needed with the dates, and we have a #205 next week?

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 7 Mar 2005, 14:19

he's made it over month ago, only abula frwarded it to px last week

jw · Post by jw » 7 Mar 2005, 14:24

ok, but if ded doesn't mind, why should we be having discussions and insinuations like above?

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 7 Mar 2005, 17:17

he does mind only he doesn't speak english at all...

jw · Post by jw » 7 Mar 2005, 17:51

i would say: give him wr for one week// one table, maybe he didn't sent in corectly, but if he send to abula i think he tried to do his best, but probably hard to understand what rules are if you don't speak no english at all

dz · Post by dz » 7 Mar 2005, 19:28

Oh, pardon me. I thought Ded had ,18 as well. I guess I got confused when certain guys don't express themselves straight enough.

Though, I still feel sad for Ded because he would have made history by leaving his name on the world record table. I hope there is some consideration still left on making things up..

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 7 Mar 2005, 19:31

in most cases i would say "if you don't send, you don't deserve" but since he struggles with English that would be unfair... i dunno what the best idea is :/

kinghias · Post by **kinghias** » 7 Mar 2005, 19:38

just change the last table and give wr to him, would be kinda fair for everyone i think (at least if infected doesn't mind having wr for one table less)

Dariuz · Post by **Dariuz** » 7 Mar 2005, 20:06

can't px just change the older tables from when ded sent his wr to abula one month ago.
imo it shouldnt be on this table because i would have had it anyways on this table

kinghias · Post by **kinghias** » 7 Mar 2005, 20:11

yes, of course i didn't mean this one, i meant the last one (#202)...

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 8 Mar 2005, 00:34

i think there should be some fix for Ded. Who agrees?

Crazy · Post by **Crazy** » 8 Mar 2005, 09:17

And so do I enter the discussion. Yes! Of course they have to edit it. He had the WR (if not officially) and then he lost it. All the old tables were wiped clean of Darmie's times so ez go edit. Just a proof he has had the best time. Of course he deserves to have his name in the tables!

It's like FatherGod got his WU for a lot of tables but in some postum way (#105-#178)

EasyGijs · Post by **EasyGijs** » 8 Mar 2005, 14:40

Dariuz congratulations!

infected · Post by **infected** » 12 Mar 2005, 21:41

did multi wr with cAEz on flat track now :>

dudek · Post by **dudek** » 12 Mar 2005, 22:45

Grats!

Teh lan is bringing results, I see ...

CaeZar · Post by **CaeZar** » 13 Mar 2005, 01:32

Yeah and it was me who played!

Mullvad · Post by **Mullvad** » 14 Mar 2005, 13:57

Yeah cAEz without you infected wouldn't have taken the wr

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 14 Mar 2005, 18:17

Grats Luther! It must be a "fake WR"

And as I said I go to Sweden...

Ky.Jelly · Post by **Ky.Jelly** » 14 Mar 2005, 19:07

wd tomas, ez bouncing back ;p

Luther · Post by **Luther** » 14 Mar 2005, 19:17

was liek "omg bounce?"

Jake · Post by **Jake** » 15 Mar 2005, 02:08

but donÂ´t tell me that u did it from teh "back"

H8 · Post by H8 » 15 Mar 2005, 23:51

Nice going Luther, i Knew you would make it!
Rex, I think he actually did the bounce landing "from the back" (or he has found some other sick style)

Boomer · Post by **Boomer** » 20 Mar 2005, 08:58

Ah, so it was 3 new WR's

And sick improvements!

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 20 Mar 2005, 10:06

NO! 51,08 ramp frenzy?????!! HOW?!???!

this isn't possible

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 20 Mar 2005, 10:13

OMG

i can't believe what i see there

Animal Farm is OMG
Labby Pro is OMG OMG
Rampy Frenzy is OMG OMG OMG

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 20 Mar 2005, 11:06

I didn't believe ramp frenzy could be done any faster. I really didn't know ELMA PRO was a fake nick too.

kinghias · Post by **kinghias** » 20 Mar 2005, 11:09

unbelievable, congratz tor

for me animal farm is the sickest one, but i dunno how he did that ramp frenzy either...

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 20 Mar 2005, 11:19

tijsjoris wrote:I really didn't know ELMA PRO was a fake nick too.

??

he wrote this

ELMA PRO wrote:
ELMA PRO wrote:I think there will be 3 new wrs: Lab pro, animal farm, and ramp frenzy. The wr tt will drop 2,39 seconds to 36:48,62
looks like i was right!

but look in the topic, he never wrote what he quoted

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 20 Mar 2005, 11:51

Meh, I never knew I was that stupid.

dunedan · Post by **dunedan** » 20 Mar 2005, 11:57

I think Lab pro was the sickest. The ride must have been like 99.999% perfect in every part.

H8 · Post by H8 » 20 Mar 2005, 14:17

Lab pro is indeed nice, almost as fast as darmoeds cheated one, but i agree with kinghias that animal farm is the sickest, maybe a minor new trick somewhere?

EDIT: Just noticed that ramp WR was 51,08, not 52,08, that's really sick, must be some new style!

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 20 Mar 2005, 14:47

Perhaps a pretty fast over rooster part.

Quinn · Post by **Quinn** » 20 Mar 2005, 15:06

Really nice wrs though lp and animal were not so big suprise to me

, but ramp

Memphis · Post by **Memphis** » 20 Mar 2005, 17:22

wth are we talking about all thoes wrs are extreemly sick. He shaved over a second on ramp frenzy are u kidding me. it's not even that long of a lvl. Animal farm he shaves like 75 seconds and laby pro another 50 60 seconds. the guys is crazy. Gratz tor!

Schumi · Post by **Schumi** » 20 Mar 2005, 18:05

dunedan wrote:I think Lab pro was the sickest. The ride must have been like 99.999% perfect in every part.

It's possibel to make 2:16.middle on Labpro, so its not that perfect. Anyway it would be a nice hÃ¶yl.

Dynamo · Post by **Dynamo** » 21 Mar 2005, 00:43

i was in awe of his wrs...its gonna be interesting to see how zweq will respond...maybe some crazy wave of wrs will be the result?

dz · Post by dz » 21 Mar 2005, 08:31

Schumi wrote:
dunedan wrote:I think Lab pro was the sickest. The ride must have been like 99.999% perfect in every part.
It's possibel to make 2:16.middle on Labpro, so its not that perfect. Anyway it would be a nice hÃ¶yl.

You just don't get it don't you?

Year 2007 and the record in LP is at least 2:15, if not 2:12.

Schumi · Post by **Schumi** » 21 Mar 2005, 09:13

dz wrote:
Schumi wrote:
dunedan wrote:I think Lab pro was the sickest. The ride must have been like 99.999% perfect in every part.
It's possibel to make 2:16.middle on Labpro, so its not that perfect. Anyway it would be a nice hÃ¶yl.
You just don't get it don't you?

Year 2007 and the record in LP is at least 2:15, if not 2:12.

I know its qiute hard. Just merge Luther's 2:19.64 rec and Darm's cheated WR rec!

Tocho · Post by **Tocho** » 21 Mar 2005, 10:48

Where are TorInge replays?
I really want to see Ramp Frenzy, Animal Farm and Labyrinth Pro

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 21 Mar 2005, 17:43

I think I want that too.

but I don't think he will publish them yet.

Kopaka · Post by **Kopaka** » 22 Mar 2005, 13:51

Well abu wrote on teh moposita that teh guy with 36 mins tt would prove it with state and replays.. but maybe he just meant prove it to moposite, nat teh ppl.

Post by **SveinR** » 25 Mar 2005, 01:03

Kopaka wrote:but maybe he just meant prove it to moposite, nat teh ppl.

I'd kinda like to say "duh" to this.

8-ball · Post by **8-ball** » 4 Apr 2005, 10:47

<3 at grav ride ^_^

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 10 Apr 2005, 15:54

crazy new wrs stini go for under 40

dunedan · Post by **dunedan** » 10 Apr 2005, 20:36

Really nice both of you

dunedan · Post by **dunedan** » 17 Apr 2005, 13:30

Share your 40.05 haircut stini

btw, gratz again!

twipley · Post by **twipley** » 24 Apr 2005, 01:05

wow, that warm up wr is just incredible! stini, show us that new style! was it a ...wall bounce? wonder how so much pressure is possible... under 13,8x should now be possible for sure