New WRs

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 14 Feb 2005, 02:34

36.51.44

Juski · Post by **Juski** » 14 Feb 2005, 11:27

I'll nominate WR table #201 to table of the century!

Anyone disagrees?

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 14 Feb 2005, 12:47

i think there was some 7 secs off table some months ago

Juski · Post by **Juski** » 14 Feb 2005, 12:53

But was it 14.05 WU or this crasy he he time? Or did the oldest WR get broken?

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 14 Feb 2005, 16:27

Juski wrote:But was it 14.05 WU or this crasy he he time? Or did the oldest WR get broken?

i think there was bowling bounce and serp bounce in that table

jw · Post by jw » 14 Feb 2005, 18:23

I think milagros mend this nice TABLE #180 (Updated 30 August 2004)

world record total times:
#179: 37:11,26
#180: 37:05,78

improvements in table #180:

5. Uphill Battle
15. #141 20,67 Zweq [WNO]
16. #180 20,65 Karlis [FM]

7. Hi Flyer
9. #135 33,65 Zweq [WNO]
10. #180 33,27 Cloud [ICE]

15. Serpents Tale
16. #146 55,98 TorInge [IC]
17. #180 54,09 Zweq

17. Labyrinth
18. #179 54,84 TorInge [ICE]
19. #180 54,79 Zweq

20. Upside Down
12. #179 1:01,31 TorInge [ICE]
13. #180 1:00,81 Zweq

26. Circuitous
14. #179 23,00 Jalli [ICE]
15. #180 22,70 Jalli [ICE]

28. Bounce Back
13. #155 51,33 Karlis [FM]
14. #180 50,97 TorInge [ICE]

46. Bowling
15. #179 56,48 Luther [ICE]
16. #180 55,34 Luther [ICE]

49. What the Heck
20. #179 38,76 TorInge [ICE]
21. #180 38,67 Zweq

51. Tricks Abound
25. #161 43,81 Zweq [DZ]
26. #180 43,19 Zweq

52. Hang Tight
19. #179 25,14 TorInge [ICE]
20. #180 25,01 TorInge [ICE]

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 14 Feb 2005, 18:46

yeh #180 > #201

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 14 Feb 2005, 19:23

no, i meant the table when tor made serp 55.98, darm made cheated 55.02 bowling and so on..

jw · Post by jw » 14 Feb 2005, 19:32

milagros wrote:no, i meant the table when tor made serp 55.98, darm made cheated 55.02 bowling and so on..

ok, that was TABLE #146 of 28 September 2003

didn't understand that, since you said:

milagros wrote:i think there was some 7 secs off table some months ago

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 14 Feb 2005, 21:22

jw wrote:
milagros wrote:no, i meant the table when tor made serp 55.98, darm made cheated 55.02 bowling and so on..
ok, that was TABLE #146 of 28 September 2003

didn't understand that, since you said:
milagros wrote:i think there was some 7 secs off table some months ago

you know..~20 months

Dynamo · Post by **Dynamo** » 15 Feb 2005, 02:00

Here's the deal...when both Zweq and t0r are done their little record-fest they should both update onto stats compare as well...would look more modern, i mean...WR total time on that site is like 30 secs off of todays WR total...someone's gotta clean up the cobwebs

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 16 Feb 2005, 14:14

i've just seen ded's 15.19 flattrack rec
dunno why he didn't send

Dynamo · Post by **Dynamo** » 16 Feb 2005, 23:01

dyou think it could be improved much mila?

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 16 Feb 2005, 23:57

Dynamo wrote:dyou think it could be improved much mila?

obviously some 15.15 posible after some hoyling
ded had better last part

ELMA PRO · Post by **ELMA PRO** » 20 Feb 2005, 07:12

why has there been no multi wr update for 1.5 months? or am i going to wrong site or something

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 20 Feb 2005, 12:15

ELMA PRO wrote:why has there been no multi wr update for 1.5 months? or am i going to wrong site or something

nobody has improved anything i guess

Dynamo · Post by **Dynamo** » 20 Feb 2005, 17:41

i think the sites back up though...or moposite just changed the link to his temporary site

Post by **SveinR** » 20 Feb 2005, 19:28

As milagros said, no new times = no new table.

kinghias · Post by **kinghias** » 20 Feb 2005, 22:02

wow, now tor already has 20 wrs, that quick round-time by zweq didn't last that long...

but why did px say 4 old wrs were improved? the only old one (53 tables) was tunnel terror, wasn't it?

Dynamo · Post by **Dynamo** » 20 Feb 2005, 22:10

i liked the steep corner record

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 20 Feb 2005, 23:01

It's ICE ICE BABY all the way.

MiEkk · Post by **MiEkk** » 20 Feb 2005, 23:42

zweq is inching his way to the oldest WR

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 20 Feb 2005, 23:55

*hint* *hint*

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 21 Feb 2005, 03:33

wow, nice WRs, especially tunnel

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 21 Feb 2005, 07:31

OMG very nice
i think too tunnel terror is the best

Juski · Post by **Juski** » 21 Feb 2005, 22:03

kinghias wrote:wow, now tor already has 20 wrs, that quick round-time by zweq didn't last that long...

but why did px say 4 old wrs were improved? the only old one (53 tables) was tunnel terror, wasn't it?

Old WRs=WRs from previous tables.

And i was like omfg when i saw the tunnel terror

anpdad · Post by **anpdad** » 23 Feb 2005, 08:30

wth, tunnel terror is nat so hard! If u watched zweq's ex-wr rec, u could see some bad things in it(especially ending). I heard things like "ye,coal rec, but when u watch it, u have a strong feeling that 57,4x is ez pasibel" a LOT of time ago.
Anywayz, all of these wrs are MAX coal. I myself like Curva very much :X

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 23 Feb 2005, 10:46

i also think that tunnelterror was not that hard, atleast not that omfg
(i'm not telling that i can make better)

Lex · Post by **Lex** » 3 Mar 2005, 03:16

OMG

so many new world records since the last time i checked, which was only about a month or 2 ago (my keyboard at home has stoppped working and i need to get an new one before i can start to hoyla again

)
but anyways, verynice times by everyone, and hopefully zweq toringe wont just stop at the new minute limit;) let them both hoyla til they reach 35 minutes

anyways, very nice recs !:D

psteve · Post by **psteve** » 6 Mar 2005, 00:56

Congrats Dariuz on first WR. Did every but me know u were hoyling this level?

CaeZar · Post by **CaeZar** » 6 Mar 2005, 01:30

Fuck.. infected lost his wr :'(!

Jake · Post by **Jake** » 6 Mar 2005, 02:45

Dariuz our scorer :* did teh <3

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 6 Mar 2005, 03:44

grats Dariuz

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 6 Mar 2005, 03:53

Yesh, quite teh nice to finally see a dutch wr on the table. EYAH! :d

psteve:

!@$=[19:02,39]--> <teajay> heb je gehoyld?
!@$=[19:02,44]--> <Dariuz> hmm nee niet echt
!@$=[19:02,52]--> <Dariuz> ik had gisteren al 15:20
!@$=[19:02,56]--> <teajay> geluk?
!@$=[19:02,57]--> <Dariuz> na een uurtje of 2
!@$=[19:03,01]--> <teajay> of echt skillz?
!@$=[19:03,09]--> <Dariuz> vandaag na 1 1/2 15:18

Which is translated:

<teajay> did you hoyl?
<Dariuz> hmm, no not really
<Dariuz> i already had 15:20 yesterday
<teajay> luck?
<Dariuz> after an hour or 2
<teajay> or real skillz?
<Dariuz> today after 1Â½ 15:18

Dariuz · Post by **Dariuz** » 6 Mar 2005, 10:05

tnx pplz :*

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 6 Mar 2005, 11:30

nice to see new name in the table
but it was kinda unfair, ded didnt get to table

CaeZar · Post by **CaeZar** » 6 Mar 2005, 11:49

Not unfair, Ded send in to late.. He took it 1 mounth ago right but didn't send mail to px, until now...

Fabio · Post by **Fabio** » 6 Mar 2005, 13:29

very nice to see the first dutch world record. gratz dariuz!!! _0_

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 6 Mar 2005, 13:35

CaeZar wrote:Not unfair, Ded send in to late.. He took it 1 mounth ago right but didn't send mail to px, until now...

this was not the problem

zworqy · Post by **zworqy** » 6 Mar 2005, 13:40

milagros wrote:
CaeZar wrote:Not unfair, Ded send in to late.. He took it 1 mounth ago right but didn't send mail to px, until now...
this was not the problem

Should that be read as "Ded cheats!" ?

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 6 Mar 2005, 14:20

zworqy no i think it was just that px and Abu couldnt decide if it really was faster than infected's rec

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 6 Mar 2005, 15:16

zworqy wrote:
milagros wrote:
CaeZar wrote:Not unfair, Ded send in to late.. He took it 1 mounth ago right but didn't send mail to px, until now...
this was not the problem
Should that be read as "Ded cheats!" ?

no

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 6 Mar 2005, 15:17

sierra wrote:zworqy no i think it was just that px and Abu couldnt decide if it really was faster than infected's rec

this was kinda unfair

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 6 Mar 2005, 16:06

Well, are you going to let us guess? Please eloborate, or stop making those "hints"..

dz · Post by dz » 6 Mar 2005, 16:11

yeah, what's so darn secret about it? things dealt like this will get bad rumours going on...

CaeZar · Post by **CaeZar** » 6 Mar 2005, 16:32

Aha.. i understand now mila

psteve · Post by **psteve** » 7 Mar 2005, 06:28

wouldn't you have to provide a rec and a state. didn't they consider the rec to be the 15.18 ride the state? or was there a bug? btw i'm guessing it was a 15.18 ride that was achieved before dariuz but due to complications it wasn't counted. i have no idea about ded missing a wr.

Post by px » 7 Mar 2005, 09:40

milagros wrote:
sierra wrote:zworqy no i think it was just that px and Abu couldnt decide if it really was faster than infected's rec
this was kinda unfair

I agree, and I'm sorry for this. Merging this rec to the former WR at about 100 timescale made it look like it wasn't faster, and that's why I left it unupdated, to find out if it really is faster. It did turn out to be, and would have been updated to table #203, but Dariuz managed to do better already. I hope this clears things out.

dz · Post by dz » 7 Mar 2005, 10:09

Apparently, I'm afraid a wrong man has the world record.

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 7 Mar 2005, 13:03

Although you can say that Ded's WR was maybe 15.189 and therefor hard to see wether it was faster or not. Dariuz' WR is 15.181, so that is unofficially better than Ded's one.

I know it's faulty to argue with that decimals stuff, but I can rectify it a little for myself, because ofcourse I'm just happy that it is the first dutch WR.

Edit
Later on I realised that the WR made by Ded was apparently 15,19 and not 15,18. So there is simply no dilemma about that. When Ded would've had 15,18, px ofcourse had put up his time, because he was then the first to send a 15,18 in.