Warm Up

chux · Post by **chux** » 7 May 2004, 18:27

WkE wrote:
John wrote:http://www.moposite.com/mopolauta/viewtopic.php?t=2246
52 topics like this to go

51... I dont believe anyone will be that bored to open such a topic for Warm Up....

Ahem...I was bored I guess

Write all your stuff about Warm Up here!

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 7 May 2004, 18:32

Did you know that 14,07 is teh WR?

Post by **SveinR** » 7 May 2004, 18:47

No.

Warm up rules! Lot's of things can be said about this..ehhmm..great lev...it's...linear and..hoylable... yes!

WkE · Post by **WkE** » 7 May 2004, 19:24

14,65.
rumours says that tor has 14,05....
my opinion - thats a lie, if he had this time he would've sent it to moposite.
your opinions?

Dyrox · Post by **Dyrox** » 7 May 2004, 21:06

I heard he has got 14,07 but a better averege than DMD...

Nicolas · Post by **Nicolas** » 7 May 2004, 23:25

I heard this about Karlis...

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 8 May 2004, 07:49

they say that both tor and karlis has 14:07 and that tor having 14:05 doesnt sound realistic ;P, personally i dont believe before i see results or proofs, besides 14:05 would need new style, not easy to find from such a lvl.

Karlis · Post by **Karlis** » 8 May 2004, 07:53

toring 14:071
Karlis 14:074
Darm 14:079

few weeks ago toringe had 4 times 14:07, so its only a matter of time

Karlis · Post by **Karlis** » 8 May 2004, 07:56

maybe it isnt really sach bad idea of having topic for every lev, maybe own section wheres 54 topics

WkE · Post by **WkE** » 8 May 2004, 07:57

Karlis wrote:maybe it isnt really sach bad idea of having topic for every lev, maybe own section wheres 54 topics

very nice idea imo!
moporators?

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 8 May 2004, 13:48

#1: if DarMoeD hit 14,079 wouldn't that get rounded up to 14,08 ??

#2: how the hell did you guys time it to a thousandth of a second??

WkE · Post by **WkE** » 8 May 2004, 13:52

sierra wrote:#1: if DarMoeD hit 14,079 wouldn't that get rounded up to 14,08 ??

#2: how the hell did you guys time it to a thousandth of a second??

1. no
2. i think its kind of program

Post by **SveinR** » 8 May 2004, 14:48

sierra wrote:#1: if DarMoeD hit 14,079 wouldn't that get rounded up to 14,08 ??

That would have been very stupid indeed, as the clock hadn't turned over to 14.08 yet..so that time hadn't passed... In no sports, etc., do you round up the times..

jw · Post by jw » 8 May 2004, 16:16

Karlis wrote:toring 14:071
Karlis 14:074
Darm 14:079

these are average time, aren't they?

WkE · Post by **WkE** » 8 May 2004, 16:35

jw wrote:
Karlis wrote:toring 14:071
Karlis 14:074
Darm 14:079
these are average time, aren't they?

no, these are the times with thousands.

jw · Post by jw » 8 May 2004, 16:54

oh, ok, than i would quote this:

sierra wrote:#2: how the hell did you guys time it to a thousandth of a second??

Phillip · Post by **Phillip** » 8 May 2004, 17:14

sierra wrote:#2: how the hell did you guys time it to a thousandth of a second??

I guess if you know the .rec file format, which probably saves frames, then you can calculate the speed of the bike at the last frame before it hits the flower. When you know the position and speed, it's easy to calculate exactly how much time it takes to hit the flower.

jw · Post by jw » 8 May 2004, 17:35

ok, but i can't that.
is there a prog that does that? or isn't that public?

Squip · Post by **Squip** » 8 May 2004, 23:39

Would love to see someone break that old record!!

Go t0r, go Karlis (or whoever feels they can break it!!)

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 9 May 2004, 13:26

what is your best time without alovolt

Boomer · Post by **Boomer** » 9 May 2004, 14:50

My best time without alovolt is 14.77. I use supervolt instead

chux · Post by **chux** » 9 May 2004, 23:26

sierra wrote:#1: if DarMoeD hit 14,079 wouldn't that get rounded up to 14,08 ??

Not if it was rounded to 3dp!
eg - the actual time was 14.0787, it would be rounded to 14.079...

Phillip · Post by **Phillip** » 10 May 2004, 12:29

jw wrote:ok, but i can't that.
is there a prog that does that? or isn't that public?

Neither can I, but "they" obviously have a program that does this. I guess it's the same program that was used to catch the state.dat-cheaters some time ago. If it has been made public, I sure would like to know...

zworqy · Post by **zworqy** » 10 May 2004, 13:10

chux wrote:
sierra wrote:#1: if DarMoeD hit 14,079 wouldn't that get rounded up to 14,08 ??
Not if it was rounded to 3dp!
eg - the actual time was 14.0787, it would be rounded to 14.079...

But Elma rounds it to 2dp...

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 11 May 2004, 12:59

3-digit counter
http://www.mxb.dk/upload2/elmatim0r.exe

WkE · Post by **WkE** » 11 May 2004, 13:05

milagros wrote:3-digit counter
http://www.mxb.dk/upload2/elmatim0r.exe

hey! it rounded one of my times up!!
my time for Labyrinth is : 01:03,00.
my time in this prog : 01:02,999.

and in flat track it didn't happened :
my time : 17,39
my time in the prog : 17,399

how come?

Karlis · Post by **Karlis** » 11 May 2004, 19:16

seems like different progs give different results, with that elmatim0r.exe darm had 14.078, earlier prog called exact.exe said its 14.079

for my rec both gave 14:074

Mick · Post by **Mick** » 12 May 2004, 07:36

i think this program is putting the wrong view into peoples minds. so many varying results, plus it actually says that my multi slalom didn't even finish. for all those thinking that tor should have wr because this prog says so, dont. i wouldnt call it official until balazs says so, which i dont see happening soon.

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 12 May 2004, 08:18

Mick wrote:i think this program is putting the wrong view into peoples minds. so many varying results, plus it actually says that my multi slalom didn't even finish. for all those thinking that tor should have wr because this prog says so, dont. i wouldnt call it official until balazs says so, which i dont see happening soon.

just like everybody says, unofficial wr

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 12 May 2004, 08:24

WkE wrote: hey! it rounded one of my times up!!
my time for Labyrinth is : 01:03,00.
my time in this prog : 01:02,999.
how come?

impsy - send this rec to me pls

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 12 May 2004, 08:26

there is probably some bug in multi recs
but i don't have any rec that does so (sveinr told me that mick's wr says not finished long time ago)
send any rec that does any bug to me pls

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 12 May 2004, 08:27

and that darm's rec might be 14.07899999999 so it may show different time in my and radim's prog (i always round down like elma)

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 12 May 2004, 10:50

2 decimal places is perfectly precise

Karlis why doesn't it show you as 14,07 on records page

jw · Post by jw » 12 May 2004, 13:04

A: Darmoed was first to get 14.07
B: the other reccord lists/ ranking lists aren't updated since 5 October 2003