When will the WR TT be under 36?!

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 15 Jan 2007, 21:06

Schumi wrote:I think the limit is around 36:12.xx :)

ha apple harvest alone could do that, at least some day it is 1.13 yes. From my experience, this is uniq info that only I know and now do you too, but from my experience ramp frenzy 50.30, animal farm 1.12, turnaround 35.high, sink 32.4x, jaws 52.7x, tunnel 56.4x, downhill 44.high JUST merges from my recs, so yeah when will you people learn. Only from those 7 levels WR TT would be at least 4 secs better even WITHOUT new styles. Also one thing that has to be heavily taken into consideration is player skill, how long can it evolve. Good example is ramp frenzy how I hoyled it for...quite alot, and everyday, EVERYday it got easier 'whops it was 50.80 ride and I didnt even notice', so I'm thinking that if I kept going on say 1 month, would I do 50.xx every run, and then the limit would be somewhere 49. I remember clearly when I did ramp frenzy style first time and liek MAX 58 time, but it just got better all the way along.

I really doubt we know shit about limits, s&l could tell a lot, at least cut 1 min from current tt

MiEkk · Post by **MiEkk** » 15 Jan 2007, 22:41

I was just thinking that its kinda hard to predcit the table in which the WR total will go under 36 because nowadays there are some weeks without any wrs and the table doesn't get updated. If the table was updated everyweek regardless of whether or not there are WRs then things would be much different. For example, most of the statistics would be in days, not tables and the the oldest WR could be more accurate. I think Zweq's prediction of table 281 will be close. My prediction was 307.

Jeppe · Post by **Jeppe** » 15 Jan 2007, 22:44

the world records will go under ._. trust me

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 15 Jan 2007, 22:53

wrtt limit is 34 or 33

Jeppe · Post by **Jeppe** » 15 Jan 2007, 22:53

i trust no one >:I

petsen · Post by **petsen** » 16 Jan 2007, 00:50

CuLiNo wrote:wrtt limit is 34 or 33

finally someone who thinks more than one minut ahead :>

id say 34.high though, larger levels already getting smaller so cant imagine to many big cuts from those anymore .,. dunno though

berhabdul · Post by **berhabdul** » 18 Jan 2007, 15:50

no 34, don't exaggerate. let's divide into two groups, those "36", and those "35". i say 36 will remain forever. not that 35 is impsy, but just without s&l it would be too hard and would need too much luck in kuski rides. now we have 22.19 to go. it Is much

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 18 Jan 2007, 15:59

Far from impossible, 35 mins tt. Under 35:3x would be quite hard though, I guess that'll take us more than five years.

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 18 Jan 2007, 16:19

omfg. ez under 35. trust me

dorTrus · Post by **dorTrus** » 18 Jan 2007, 16:28

CuLiNo wrote:ez under 35

ez???

berhabdul · Post by **berhabdul** » 18 Jan 2007, 16:54

Culino, look at the wr table for 5 minutes, and then say to yourself aloud and slowly "easy 34". tell when you finish

WkE · Post by **WkE** » 18 Jan 2007, 19:37

berhabdul wrote:Culino, look at the wr table for 5 minutes, and then say to yourself aloud and slowly "easy 34". tell when you finish

berhabdul, read the first page of this topic: http://mopolauta.moposite.com/viewtopic.php?t=418, and then say to yourself "34 is impsy".

I mean, just 3 years ago, people were talking like "under 38 is hard... but possible", "under 37 is impsy", "under 37 will be possible maybe 10 years from now" and so on. No one even dared to talk about 35:xx in less than 5 years (what I believe will happen).

So yeah, learn from the past. You can always be sceptical and follow the instinct that "now the WRs are almost maxed", or you can rely on what has happened so far, and just believe that more limits could be broken. It is always hard to foretell it, but it always comes true.

BTW, just for the record: when looking at the current WR table with 6 new WRs, 34 TT does look easy

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 18 Jan 2007, 22:05

you nat know teh fakc about possible times
maybe i should not have asked my genetic elma friend

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 11 May 2007, 20:55

tijsjoris wrote:Far from impossible, 35 mins tt. Under 35:3x would be quite hard though, I guess that'll take us more than five years.

hmz let's see about that

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 11 May 2007, 21:30

Zweq wrote: My personal guess is #281

hmz let's see about that

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 11 May 2007, 21:48

I think you can come pretty close to that indeed.

Raven · Post by **Raven** » 12 May 2007, 13:49

November 2008

Schumi · Post by **Schumi** » 12 May 2007, 15:23

Zweq wrote:
Schumi wrote:I think the limit is around 36:12.xx
ha apple harvest alone could do that, at least some day it is 1.13 yes. From my experience, this is uniq info that only I know and now do you too, but from my experience ramp frenzy 50.30, animal farm 1.12, turnaround 35.high, sink 32.4x, jaws 52.7x, tunnel 56.4x, downhill 44.high JUST merges from my recs, so yeah when will you people learn. Only from those 7 levels WR TT would be at least 4 secs better even WITHOUT new styles. Also one thing that has to be heavily taken into consideration is player skill, how long can it evolve. Good example is ramp frenzy how I hoyled it for...quite alot, and everyday, EVERYday it got easier 'whops it was 50.80 ride and I didnt even notice', so I'm thinking that if I kept going on say 1 month, would I do 50.xx every run, and then the limit would be somewhere 49. I remember clearly when I did ramp frenzy style first time and liek MAX 58 time, but it just got better all the way along.

I really doubt we know shit about limits, s&l could tell a lot, at least cut 1 min from current tt

Tunnel is now even better than your guess.

But anyway the rest of the times are still so interesting.

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 13 May 2007, 00:00

what a fucking guess, I said merges of my recs (months ago) you asshole

gimp · Post by **gimp** » 28 May 2007, 08:52

seeing as zweq is the one getting a whole lot of the wrs and making this 36.xx possible id say his guess is closest to the real thing at #281

ElToto · Post by **ElToto** » 28 May 2007, 10:37

gimp wrote:seeing as zweq is the one getting a whole lot of the wrs and making this 36.xx possible id say his guess is closest to the real thing at #281

safe run

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 28 May 2007, 13:52

possible under even before 270

dorTrus · Post by **dorTrus** » 28 May 2007, 14:07

Zweq wrote:possible under even before 270

hoho))

jaytea · Post by **jaytea** » 28 May 2007, 18:15

OOOOOH i wonder what next wr table has in store

zweq you sick mother fucker

nick-o-matic · Post by **nick-o-matic** » 29 May 2007, 21:55

jaytea wrote:OOOOOH i wonder what next wr table has in store zweq you sick mother fucker

I can smell a revolution at lab pro.

zworqy · Post by **zworqy** » 31 May 2007, 08:16

probably before #300... on table 300 would be cool though

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 1 Jun 2007, 21:28

nick-o-matic wrote:
jaytea wrote:OOOOOH i wonder what next wr table has in store :D zweq you sick mother fucker
I can smell a revolution at lab pro.

lol was kidding when I said it, but soon I believe it myself too

Post by px » 15 Jun 2007, 09:43

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 15 Jun 2007, 10:32

px wrote:#265

dammit, zweq & john didnt want to make a guess after monday or when was it broken:)

zworqy · Post by **zworqy** » 15 Jun 2007, 10:34

SIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICK

Seriously makes you wonder if there is a cheatprogram going around in WNO...

John · Post by **John** » 15 Jun 2007, 10:34

zweq's hifly was the run which took it under btw

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 15 Jun 2007, 10:36

zworqy wrote:Seriously makes you wonder if there is a cheatprogram going around in WNO...

maybe i should release that wnoelma.exe;)

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 15 Jun 2007, 12:49

so wr tt is now under 36 in table 265, sadly enough only serious guess (281) was made by me so instead of thinking too far I will ask now the following:

When will the wr tt be under 35.50?

I'll stick to the 281

dorTrus · Post by **dorTrus** » 15 Jun 2007, 13:04

The_BoneLESS · Post by **The_BoneLESS** » 15 Jun 2007, 13:43

i'll guess 275

WkE · Post by **WkE** » 15 Jun 2007, 13:47

zweq, who are you fooling?

266

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 15 Jun 2007, 13:59

hehe no more impsy styles available, or except maybe pipe and some small shit in AH. last table was just lucky with 2 dream styles

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 15 Jun 2007, 14:24

i guess like #299

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 15 Jun 2007, 15:15

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 15 Jun 2007, 17:59

i know few other (maybe impsy) styles except pipe so ez 35.3x

edit: i looked at WRs and found onley 5 levs (1-2 sec to cut in each) so nat ez :/

Mawane · Post by **Mawane** » 16 Jun 2007, 01:13

Kopaka wrote:If no elma 2 or left alovolt or new cheat or something like that WR TT will NEVAH go under 36, ok, I will bet my state.dat on that

I want your state.dat!

Mawane · Post by **Mawane** » 16 Jun 2007, 01:24

Dynamo wrote:wr TT will end up being 36:25.16 exactly. If it goes under I'm quiting elma

Do you will really quit Elma? lol

The_BoneLESS · Post by **The_BoneLESS** » 16 Jun 2007, 03:46

Mawane wrote:
Dynamo wrote:wr TT will end up being 36:25.16 exactly. If it goes under I'm quiting elma
Do you will really quit Elma? lol

He has almost already quit... but he still makes a few Canadian records now and then.

MiEkk · Post by **MiEkk** » 16 Jun 2007, 05:40

Zweq wrote:so wr tt is now under 36 in table 265, sadly enough only serious guess (281) was made by me so instead of thinking too far I will ask now the following:

When will the wr tt be under 35.50?

I'll stick to the 281

I think I was the only other person who took a serious guess with table #307. I think the wr tt wil be under 35.50 at table #285 or on August 24th, 2007. And I guess John will go under 36 min tt on September 30th, 2007.

Kopaka · Post by **Kopaka** » 16 Jun 2007, 10:21

Mawane wrote:
Kopaka wrote:If no elma 2 or left alovolt or new cheat or something like that WR TT will NEVAH go under 36, ok, I will bet my state.dat on that

I want your state.dat!

dammit!

bye bye 42 tt http://up.k10x.net/qkcsmliboqshz/state.dat

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 16 Jun 2007, 11:17

Zweq wrote:but from my experience ramp frenzy 50.30

LAL idiath =)

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 16 Jun 2007, 11:31

aha kopa, will you start all over again!!

Memphis · Post by **Memphis** » 16 Jun 2007, 16:41

New wave can be under 1:20:xx by one of these two.

Dynamo · Post by **Dynamo** » 16 Jun 2007, 16:53

Zweq wrote:
Dynamo wrote:wr TT will end up being 36:25.16 exactly. If it goes under I'm quiting elma
ha!

Seems I quit

btw under 36 lmao WOW, at least 2 new styles in thattable =P

Polarix · Post by **Polarix** » 16 Jun 2007, 22:46

I don't understand how it is possible to do these times!

When will the WR TT be under 36?!

Re: When will the WR TT be under 36?!