What would WR TT be after 3 years?

Look for replays and levels and ask people's times.

Moderator: Moporators

User avatar
Raven
Moporator
Posts: 2726
Joined: 7 Feb 2005, 15:28
Team: MiE
Location: Finland.
Contact:

What would WR TT be after 3 years?

Post by Raven »

I say 36.35.92
Seize the day
User avatar
Wezz
Kuski
Posts: 612
Joined: 2 Dec 2004, 21:46
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Wezz »

in 3 years = Elma 2 = Höyläs all over Elma 2
Wezz 1-100 Levels - PTL pack - ADLP Pack - CR Pack - My Website - Team Website - Proud member of TEM - DONT WANT A ELMA 2!!! My internal TT: 45:xx:xx - Team TEM TT: 39:xx:xx Image
User avatar
sierra
39mins club
Posts: 2471
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 22:51

Post by sierra »

in 3 years = we are all cheaters = TT is 09:00:00:00
[OMG] | [SpEF] | Apparently my TT was once 39:26:06
User avatar
wwwDotcoM
Kuski
Posts: 270
Joined: 1 Jun 2005, 20:29
Location: Bulgaria Totaltime: 46,26,xx

Post by wwwDotcoM »

Above 36:40:xx
User avatar
zworqy
Kuski
Posts: 3706
Joined: 19 May 2002, 23:17
Location: Lilla Edet, Sweden
Contact:

Post by zworqy »

maybe 36:2x
<Fihlvein> another case of zworqy-is-always-right closed i guess
<yoosef> zworqy doesnt suck at anything
User avatar
Lukazz
36mins club
Posts: 5241
Joined: 4 Jul 2004, 12:10

Post by Lukazz »

there was some contest on moposite years ago, where ppl guessed about TT in 2006 and the "best" guess was 38:5x
so i think in 3 years (when ppl still play elma1) will be 35:4x
TT: 36:59:53 || Avg TT: 38:09:65
User avatar
Wezz
Kuski
Posts: 612
Joined: 2 Dec 2004, 21:46
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Wezz »

Some day, Hi flyer brutal volt style will succeed and probably some other styles will be found (bounce stlyes? mayb)
Last edited by Wezz on 8 Sep 2005, 16:17, edited 1 time in total.
Wezz 1-100 Levels - PTL pack - ADLP Pack - CR Pack - My Website - Team Website - Proud member of TEM - DONT WANT A ELMA 2!!! My internal TT: 45:xx:xx - Team TEM TT: 39:xx:xx Image
User avatar
wwwDotcoM
Kuski
Posts: 270
Joined: 1 Jun 2005, 20:29
Location: Bulgaria Totaltime: 46,26,xx

Post by wwwDotcoM »

[offtopic] What's a brutal bounce? [/offtopic]
User avatar
Lukazz
36mins club
Posts: 5241
Joined: 4 Jul 2004, 12:10

Post by Lukazz »

[offtopic] look at uphill mopo rec [/offtopic]
TT: 36:59:53 || Avg TT: 38:09:65
User avatar
Wezz
Kuski
Posts: 612
Joined: 2 Dec 2004, 21:46
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Wezz »

[offtopic]sry, meant Brutal Volt, and i mean from platform in air [/offtopic]
Wezz 1-100 Levels - PTL pack - ADLP Pack - CR Pack - My Website - Team Website - Proud member of TEM - DONT WANT A ELMA 2!!! My internal TT: 45:xx:xx - Team TEM TT: 39:xx:xx Image
User avatar
milagros
Cheatless
Posts: 4560
Joined: 19 May 2002, 17:05

Post by milagros »

back to topic : 36.08.12
[carebox]
klisse
Kuski
Posts: 114
Joined: 29 May 2002, 08:03

Post by klisse »

Lukazz wrote:there was some contest on moposite years ago, where ppl guessed about TT in 2006 and the "best" guess was 38:5x
so i think in 3 years (when ppl still play elma1) will be 35:4x
Sathy's guess:
Single WRs total: 37:04.23 (1.january 2006)

Quite ok guess in December 2001 when wr total was around 40 min.
User avatar
wwwDotcoM
Kuski
Posts: 270
Joined: 1 Jun 2005, 20:29
Location: Bulgaria Totaltime: 46,26,xx

Post by wwwDotcoM »

Ye, I meant what's brutal volt?
teajay
Donator duck
Posts: 10043
Joined: 3 Apr 2003, 17:53

Post by teajay »

User avatar
wwwDotcoM
Kuski
Posts: 270
Joined: 1 Jun 2005, 20:29
Location: Bulgaria Totaltime: 46,26,xx

Post by wwwDotcoM »

Haeh no serious..

I saw that one :)
User avatar
Juski
Kuski
Posts: 2200
Joined: 26 Dec 2003, 20:53
Location: irc://irc.ircnet.org/ranks

Post by Juski »

wwwDotcoM wrote:Haeh no serious..

I saw that one :)
At the end where he uses the bike, that is serious.
No regrets Image
Are you LOST?
User avatar
SveinR
Moporator
Posts: 5469
Joined: 21 May 2002, 08:05
Location: Oslo, Norway
Contact:

Post by SveinR »

...and if you absolutely need to know, maybe search the forum?
Was it cast for the mass who burn and toil?
Or for the vultures who thirst for blood and oil?
Rules | FAQ
User avatar
jw
Kuski
Posts: 1845
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 21:10
Team: raam65
Location: Netherlands TotalTime: 54:54:54

Post by jw »

i guess total time is 35.44

if the community is alive
User avatar
Juski
Kuski
Posts: 2200
Joined: 26 Dec 2003, 20:53
Location: irc://irc.ircnet.org/ranks

Post by Juski »

a community this big with the possible reserves of more kuskis in elastomaniac's forum it is hard to kill in three years. But as the topic states 'would' that means 'would be if not elma2 came out' maybe we can make another topic about how much will elma2 wr tt will be 1 year after release =)
No regrets Image
Are you LOST?
User avatar
Xiphias
39mins club
Posts: 4098
Joined: 23 Nov 2004, 23:05

Post by Xiphias »

If u guys may talk Elma 2 also then i think it will be more than the TT time is today. because of new lvls (Hopefully).

But nowadays elma: 35.39.58 presice.. LoL
Thorze wrote:I just wanted to make a cool topic like Juish have cool topics..
User avatar
CaeZar
Kuski
Posts: 250
Joined: 25 Jul 2003, 21:29
Location: Göteborg

Post by CaeZar »

I guess tt gonna be 36:23..
cAEz Image | Total Time: 40:42:62
culinko
38mins club
Posts: 1551
Joined: 29 Dec 2002, 19:17
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Contact:

Post by culinko »

i think 35:59:50 :)
User avatar
Kestas
Kuski
Posts: 576
Joined: 4 Mar 2005, 21:58
Location: Lithuania

Post by Kestas »

you guys are funny. a tt of 35.xx is just plain unreal. to much of science-fiction for that time. there's no such map that something new is yet to be found, all levels are at their max and mostly all of the new recs are dropping wr table down to -0.00.01.

impsy~
User avatar
dz
first 39tt
Posts: 3749
Joined: 19 May 2002, 15:16
Team: FM
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by dz »

I agree. Wait, didn't somebody say that two years ago?
crazyevildude
Kuski
Posts: 86
Joined: 3 Jul 2005, 18:46
Location: Cardiff, Wales

Post by crazyevildude »

35:51:64.....Best individual TT 36:14:11...

My TT - 55:xx:xx maybe? :cry: :lol:
User avatar
CaeZar
Kuski
Posts: 250
Joined: 25 Jul 2003, 21:29
Location: Göteborg

Post by CaeZar »

Hah! Best individual tt: maybe like the wrtt atm
cAEz Image | Total Time: 40:42:62
User avatar
Juski
Kuski
Posts: 2200
Joined: 26 Dec 2003, 20:53
Location: irc://irc.ircnet.org/ranks

Post by Juski »

kestas ppl have always said that, they have always been wrong. may i remind you of axxu recent improvment on hill legend, quite big improvment for such a short level, and i bet htere is hundred of styles we haven't discovered yet.

caezar how lnog was it between 37TT wr limit brake and t0ringe went under? no three years atleast.
No regrets Image
Are you LOST?
User avatar
milagros
Cheatless
Posts: 4560
Joined: 19 May 2002, 17:05

Post by milagros »

Kestas wrote:you guys are funny. a tt of 35.xx is just plain unreal. to much of science-fiction for that time. there's no such map that something new is yet to be found, all levels are at their max and mostly all of the new recs are dropping wr table down to -0.00.01.

impsy~
some of the wrs are soooo far from the limit..
of course 35.xx possible
[carebox]
User avatar
Fluff
39mins club
Posts: 340
Joined: 1 Nov 2003, 12:30
Location: France

Post by Fluff »

ez 36.1x for wr TT, best indiv TT..hum maybe 36.2x but like some said above, that would happen only if "elma 2" is not out.
AC member | Team TT = 37:5x,xx || TT = 39:15.61/ avgTT = 40:09,776 |
updated 12/13/2006 8.23pm
User avatar
CaeZar
Kuski
Posts: 250
Joined: 25 Jul 2003, 21:29
Location: Göteborg

Post by CaeZar »

I cant see ppl got 36:2x tt.. Who gonna play so much? OF cuz its possible with new crazy styles and maybe left alo.. But who have the skills for it? I dont think new players can make 36:2x..
cAEz Image | Total Time: 40:42:62
User avatar
jw
Kuski
Posts: 1845
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 21:10
Team: raam65
Location: Netherlands TotalTime: 54:54:54

Post by jw »

CaeZar wrote:I cant see ppl got 36:2x tt.. Who gonna play so much? OF cuz its possible with new crazy styles and maybe left alo.. But who have the skills for it? I dont think new players can make 36:2x..
maybe some russians, you don't know about?
User avatar
CaeZar
Kuski
Posts: 250
Joined: 25 Jul 2003, 21:29
Location: Göteborg

Post by CaeZar »

Heh.. Dont know any russian who can make 36:low tt.. Maybe some kuski do 36:45 tt in future. Never 36:2x :) Never
cAEz Image | Total Time: 40:42:62
User avatar
dorTrus
Kuski
Posts: 458
Joined: 30 Apr 2005, 11:23
Location: Russia, Moscow

Post by dorTrus »

never say never ;)
but, imho, 36:2x pers tt - be with 10^-5 chance :?:
Mary-Jane Racers
Image
Hi! I'm a signature virus. Copy me into your signature to help me spread.
TT 47:5x:xx / OLP TT 29:0x:xx
culinko
38mins club
Posts: 1551
Joined: 29 Dec 2002, 19:17
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Contact:

Post by culinko »

wr tt: <36
personal tt: <36
User avatar
Grace
38mins club
Posts: 4842
Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.

Post by Grace »

the wr tt will probably turn to about 35:45,xx---same as individual....some new expert will step in and take all WR's really easily..
Image Cyberscore! Image
___________________________________________________
Image
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
User avatar
berhabdul
Banned
Posts: 1125
Joined: 18 Jul 2005, 17:09
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Contact:

Post by berhabdul »

I don't know. Maybe 36.35 maybe lower some years ago we were max sure that 38.xx is the lowest
crazyevildude
Kuski
Posts: 86
Joined: 3 Jul 2005, 18:46
Location: Cardiff, Wales

Post by crazyevildude »

Samir wrote:I don't know. Maybe 36.35 maybe lower some years ago we were max sure that 38.xx is the lowest
Umm...WRTT is currently 36.40.xx, you think it will only improve some 5 seconds in the next two and a half years? :?

Unless you refer to the personal TT, but again 23seconds of improvement don't seem alot of three years :?. that's 7.7second per year.
User avatar
Labs
37mins club
Posts: 1213
Joined: 2 May 2005, 14:20
Team: SPEED
Location: Hungary
Contact:

Post by Labs »

I think: 36:25:xx
User avatar
Labs
37mins club
Posts: 1213
Joined: 2 May 2005, 14:20
Team: SPEED
Location: Hungary
Contact:

Re: What would WR TT be after 3 years?

Post by Labs »

#290: 35:49,75 (23.09.2008)

I don't know who is crazyevildude but he was very close :P He said 35:51:64.
Team SPEED

Image
User avatar
Lukazz
36mins club
Posts: 5241
Joined: 4 Jul 2004, 12:10

Re:

Post by Lukazz »

Lukazz wrote:there was some contest on moposite years ago, where ppl guessed about TT in 2006 and the "best" guess was 38:5x
so i think in 3 years (when ppl still play elma1) will be 35:4x
i was right :)
TT: 36:59:53 || Avg TT: 38:09:65
User avatar
Lukazz
36mins club
Posts: 5241
Joined: 4 Jul 2004, 12:10

Re: What would WR TT be after 3 years?

Post by Lukazz »

i think in 3 years WR TT will be 35.18.72
TT: 36:59:53 || Avg TT: 38:09:65
User avatar
Labs
37mins club
Posts: 1213
Joined: 2 May 2005, 14:20
Team: SPEED
Location: Hungary
Contact:

Re: What would WR TT be after 3 years?

Post by Labs »

I think 35:15.xx
Team SPEED

Image
User avatar
pawq
38mins club
Posts: 6547
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 19:56
Team: TR
Location: Southampton, UK

Re: What would WR TT be after 3 years?

Post by pawq »

actually id say 35:20.. but if you say 35:18, let it be 35:10 :P
User avatar
Mawane
Kuski
Posts: 3299
Joined: 15 Apr 2007, 01:05
Team: SV
Contact:

Re: What would WR TT be after 3 years?

Post by Mawane »

34:56,xx
Website || TT:41:45:64 || Team Image
Image[url=steam://friends/add/76561198025490048]Image[/url]
User avatar
Lukazz
36mins club
Posts: 5241
Joined: 4 Jul 2004, 12:10

Re: What would WR TT be after 3 years?

Post by Lukazz »

Mawane wrote:34:56,xx
that would surprise me
TT: 36:59:53 || Avg TT: 38:09:65
User avatar
pawq
38mins club
Posts: 6547
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 19:56
Team: TR
Location: Southampton, UK

Re: What would WR TT be after 3 years?

Post by pawq »

Lukazz wrote:
Mawane wrote:34:56,xx
that would surprise me
more or less, me too
User avatar
Zweq
34mins club
Posts: 4055
Joined: 28 Nov 2002, 15:54
Location: suo mesta

Re: What would WR TT be after 3 years?

Post by Zweq »

past:

#001: 44:26,47
Updated 6 March 2000

#060: 40:31,60
Updated 8 March 2001

#082: 39:35,83
Updated 17 March 2002

#116: 38:37,29
Updated 9 March 2003

#165: 37:20,91
Updated 8 March 2004

#203: 36:51,06
Updated 6 March 2005

#235: 36:38,27
Updated 12 March 2006

#258: 36:22,07
Updated 12 March 2007

#282: 35:54,64
Updated 31 March 2008

#295: 35:48,38
Updated 9 March 2009

------------------
today:

#298: 35:42,08
Updated 5 July 2009

------------------
future:

#313: 35:32,92
Updated 14 March 2010

#325: 35:26,59
Updated 13 March 2011

#346: 35:15,42
Updated 11 March 2012

Why? I guess new belma release comes later than expected, ppl höyl ints til the end of 2009 dropping tt a fair deal. New belma released early 2010, ppl switch to battling, höyling competition takes place on EOL levelpack and other contests such as speed and multiplayer records / TT's instead of single int wrs. Closing in to late 2010 px resigns from updating wrs and svein takes over, and surprisingly svein is even lazier updat0r than px, jarkko has to wait 2 months to get his 19.79 uphill battle record on table. Year changes to 2011 and thanks to crazy svein wr policies stini pipe bugs are accepted and 3 secs are cut off from wr tt. In 2012 somebody finally finds the 1.0x style in apple harvest and talli makes 49 in serpents tale (what a loser still playing elma), jarkko makes 19.76 to uphill battle, soon to be finished with top 50k under 20.

E T C
Image
User avatar
Lukazz
36mins club
Posts: 5241
Joined: 4 Jul 2004, 12:10

Re: What would WR TT be after 3 years?

Post by Lukazz »

:mrgreen:
TT: 36:59:53 || Avg TT: 38:09:65
User avatar
Bismuth
Kuski
Posts: 2777
Joined: 26 Feb 2008, 07:11
Team: <3
Location: Not on lauta
Contact:

Re: What would WR TT be after 3 years?

Post by Bismuth »

Zweq, there are still .53 missing... Lab Pro?
:mrhat:
User avatar
jaytea
37mins club
Posts: 1015
Joined: 22 May 2004, 08:45

Re: What would WR TT be after 3 years?

Post by jaytea »

just so someone can possibly look back in the future and laugh, i don't think we'll ever see 34.xx. 35.1x seems a fair guess, let's say 35.18.34 in 3 years
im pretty good at elma
Post Reply