do you have a hÃ¶yled top-10?

Grace · Post by **Grace** » 14 Jul 2011, 17:33

Labs wrote:

Level 43, He He:
    00:55:91    Labs
    00:56:03    Labs
    00:56:08    Labs
    00:56:24    Labs
    00:56:26    Labs
    00:56:31    Labs
    00:56:35    Labs
    00:56:37    Labs
    00:56:38    Labs
    00:56:38    Labs

Mine is not that hoyled Bjenn, but maybe still nice :*

Sick grats

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 14 Jul 2011, 17:43

sick 55. 8)

Kazan · Post by **Kazan** » 14 Jul 2011, 18:32

Level 53, Hooked:
00:17:53 Kazan
00:17:54 Kazan
00:17:55 Kazan
00:17:59 Kazan
00:17:64 Kazan
00:17:69 Kazan
00:17:71 Kazan
00:17:71 Kazan
00:17:72 Kazan
00:17:82 Kazan

ROKKEBOL · Post by **ROKKEBOL** » 14 Jul 2011, 18:59

Kazan wrote:Level 53, Hooked:
00:17:53 Kazan
00:17:54 Kazan
00:17:55 Kazan
00:17:59 Kazan
00:17:64 Kazan
00:17:69 Kazan
00:17:71 Kazan
00:17:71 Kazan
00:17:72 Kazan
00:17:82 Kazan

www.elmaclub.net wrote:5. Kazan 00:17:53 World Class 03.12.2006

lol kaz)

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 14 Jul 2011, 20:41

Wow yet another one! Congrats Labs, you finally got it over Zweq :D For long hopefully

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 15 Jul 2011, 08:32

Yes, but if grob tries the levels he's doomed. :(

Labs · Post by **Labs** » 7 Aug 2011, 17:57

Code: Select all

Level 43, He He:
    00:55:83    Labs
    00:55:91    Labs
    00:55:99    Labs
    00:56:03    Labs
    00:56:08    Labs
    00:56:11    Labs
    00:56:12    Labs
    00:56:13    Labs
    00:56:17    Labs
    00:56:19    Labs

Now it's a bit bettar, but all times u56 would be really nice :*

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 7 Aug 2011, 18:16

sick 8)

Madness · Post by **Madness** » 7 Aug 2011, 19:49

Gratz =)

Mats · Post by **Mats** » 5 Oct 2011, 22:15

Level 35, Labyrinth Pro:
02:37:49 Mats
02:37:55 Mats
02:41:59 Mats
02:41:97 Mats
02:45:02 Mats
02:45:02 Mats
02:45:39 Mats
03:18:47 Mats
03:23:09 Mats
03:23:45 Mats
03:23:50 Mats
03:23:57 Mats

Funny pattern

Bismuth · Post by **Bismuth** » 6 Oct 2011, 15:43

my new wave top10 once was something like 1:51.xx 1:51.xx 1:51.xx 1:56.xx 1:56.xx 1:56.xx 1:56.xx 1:56.xx 2:14.xx 2:14.xx or maybe I'm just crazy and my memory fails

Mats · Post by **Mats** » 6 Oct 2011, 21:36

I always got the best time first, then noob runs which turns out to be just as good as my pb.

Jarkko · Post by **Jarkko** » 17 Nov 2011, 16:00

Jarkko wrote:If that top 100 wasn't crazy enough.

Here is uphill battle top 1000:

19:84 x 4
19:85 x 2
19:86 x 6
19:87 x 14
19:88 x 15
19:89 x 20
19:90 x 34
19:91 x 51
19:92 x 52
19:93 x 70
19:94 x 81
19:95 x 102
19:96 x 111
19:97 x 143
19:98 x 139
19:99 x 156

Averages:
top10 19:850
top100 19:8855
top1000 19:95232

I know this is just stupid, but here is updated top 2000:

19:79
19:80 x 2
19:81
19:82
19:83
19:84 x 11
19:85 x 16
19:86 x 28
19:87 x 39
19:88 x 43
19:89 x 57
19:90 x 85
19:91 x 121
19:92 x 123
19:93 x 139
19:94 x 170
19:95 x 199
19:96 x 204
19:97 x 247
19:98 x 249
19:99 x 263 (+8 more)

exactly 200 times under 19:90

top10 average is 19:821, but didn't bothered to calculate others.

I have every rec saved and they are total just 32,4 megabytes.

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 17 Nov 2011, 16:03

One word: Incredible.

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 17 Nov 2011, 16:47

u hoyled teh again or just summarized?:)

Lousku · Post by **Lousku** » 17 Nov 2011, 19:25

This is not "do you have a höyled top-2000". Sickest shit ever.

anpdad · Post by **anpdad** » 17 Nov 2011, 19:34

One word: what the fack

jonsykkel · Post by **jonsykkel** » 17 Nov 2011, 19:39

one word: igge

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 17 Nov 2011, 20:48

jonharkulsykkel wrote:one word: igge

Weird word.

Thundr- · Post by **Thundr-** » 17 Nov 2011, 20:55

Funny trivia but thats a total of ~39889 seconds worth of times finished under 20.00 - or just above 11 hours if you will.

jonsykkel · Post by **jonsykkel** » 17 Nov 2011, 21:04

could you pasibly upload the recs worse or equal to the best one currently shared (19.84 or something?duno) ? would be awsome for testing purposes no problem if orka just woud be najs to use for testing a program and some other stuff thanks btw really sick

Grace · Post by **Grace** » 18 Nov 2011, 00:45

jonharkulsykkel wrote:could you pasibly upload the recs worse or equal to the best one currently shared (19.84 or something?duno) ? would be awsome for testing purposes no problem if orka just woud be najs to use for testing a program and some other stuff thanks btw really sick

Hm think there's a better rec floating around

Chris · Post by **Chris** » 18 Nov 2011, 12:18

wow Jarkko!

Bludek · Post by **Bludek** » 21 Nov 2011, 08:42

OLD:
Level 42, Enduro:
00:53:71 Bludek
worse

NEW
Level 42, Enduro:
00:49:02 Bludek
00:49:26 Bludek
00:49:55 Bludek
00:49:80 Bludek
00:49:82 Bludek
00:50:39 Bludek
00:50:42 Bludek
00:50:47 Bludek
00:50:52 Bludek
00:50:53 Bludek

target is beating Madness

And I have to agree, that this lev is quite unhoyled by pros...

Thundr- · Post by **Thundr-** » 21 Nov 2011, 16:50

hoyled some dt, and was rather lucky with similar times, actuallys its more like unlucky imo

Level 40, Double Trouble:
01:25:07 Thunder
01:25:07 Thunder
01:25:08 Thunder
01:25:48 Thunder
01:25:48 Thunder
01:25:85 Thunder
01:25:86 Thunder
01:25:93 Thunder
01:26:09 Thunder
01:26:18 Thunder

Kazan · Post by **Kazan** » 21 Nov 2011, 17:20

Level 54, Apple Harvest:
01:12:89 Kazan
01:15:89 Kazan
01:16:39 Kazan
01:17:61 Kazan
01:19:89 Kazan
01:32:13 Kazan
01:32:32 Kazan
01:34:17 Kazan
01:34:24 Kazan
01:34:40 Kazan

))

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 21 Nov 2011, 17:24

kazantastic

Zid · Post by **Zid** » 21 Nov 2011, 18:05

Level 01, Warm Up:
00:14:12 Zid
00:14:14 Zid
00:14:15 Zid
00:14:15 Zid
00:14:15 Zid
00:14:15 Zid
00:14:16 Zid
00:14:16 Zid
00:14:16 Zid
00:14:16 Zid

jamppa · Post by **jamppa** » 22 Nov 2011, 16:02

I had once wu top ten all times 14.11
now 14.09, 14.10, 14.11 rest

Thundr- · Post by **Thundr-** » 21 Dec 2011, 04:48

Level 42, Enduro:
00:47:45 Thunder
00:47:50 Thunder
00:47:51 Thunder
00:47:54 Thunder
00:47:57 Thunder
00:47:58 Thunder
00:47:59 Thunder
00:47:64 Thunder
00:47:65 Thunder
00:47:65 Thunder

i used to be happy while playing this level, then i took an arrow to the knee

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 21 Dec 2011, 07:00

YOU GET THAT WR NOW, ARROW OR NO ARROW

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 5 Jul 2012, 10:33

who has teh most oldWRs/WRs in his top10?????????????
for exampk:
Level 37, Jaws:
00:53:42 Zamppe
00:53:77 Zamppe
00:53:88 Zamppe
00:53:96 Zamppe
00:53:99 Zamppe
00:54:24 Zamppe
00:54:53 Zamppe
00:54:62 Zamppe
00:54:91 Zamppe
00:55:12 Zamppe

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 5 Jul 2012, 10:48

I wander jarkko uphill balle. Or maybe too hoyled so he knocked out old wrs)

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 5 Jul 2012, 10:54

Jarkko's had 10 WRs in uphill, but i guess not all of them are in his top10 ;p
http://www.moposite.com/records_wr_statistics.php

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 5 Jul 2012, 11:01

Pawq wrote:Jarkko's had 10 WRs in uphill, but i guess not all of them are in his top10 ;p
http://www.moposite.com/records_wr_statistics.php

http://mopolauta.moposite.com/viewtopic ... 00#p213309

ez win for psy with his ah. he had 8 new wrs in ah on 8 tables in a row. that's some crazy shit.

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 5 Jul 2012, 11:42

of course times only that have been in table. yeap i am also thinking psy apple harvest or jeppe/jokke enduro . how to gain acesss to those top10?? ? ? we might never know the truth!!!!!

Grace · Post by **Grace** » 5 Jul 2012, 14:37

Zweq wrote:of course times only that have been in table.

if not this, raven has like some retarded number of slalom WRs in top10

jonsykkel · Post by **jonsykkel** » 5 Jul 2012, 15:06

Level 29, Headbanger:
00:51:19 jon
00:53:60 jon
01:11:60 jon
01:20:48 jon
01:23:63 jon
01:24:55 jon
01:31:21 jon
01:36:92 jon
02:43:75 jon

Mielz · Post by **Mielz** » 22 Aug 2012, 10:20

Level 47, Enigma:
00:19:26 Marcin
00:19:28 Marcin
00:19:30 Marcin
00:19:33 Marcin
00:19:34 Marcin
00:19:36 Marcin
00:19:37 Marcin
00:19:37 Marcin
00:19:38 Marcin
00:19:39 Marcin

anonymous32 · Post by **anonymous32** » 22 Aug 2012, 11:10

Mielz wrote:Level 47, Enigma:
00:19:26 Marcin
00:19:28 Marcin
00:19:30 Marcin
00:19:33 Marcin
00:19:34 Marcin
00:19:36 Marcin
00:19:37 Marcin
00:19:37 Marcin
00:19:38 Marcin
00:19:39 Marcin

Enigma has been standing for 100 tables: do not let it stand past 200! ;)

Tm · Post by Tm » 23 Aug 2012, 19:15

Level 42, Enduro:
00:47:35 Tm
00:47:39 Tm
00:47:44 Tm
00:47:50 Tm
00:47:51 Tm
00:47:52 Tm
00:47:54 Tm
00:47:54 Tm
00:47:55 Tm
00:47:59 Tm

Satan level

.2x and i quit it.

Mielz · Post by **Mielz** » 29 Oct 2012, 14:43

Level 53, Hooked:
00:17:034 Marcin // new
00:17:039 Marcin // old
00:17:04 Marcin
00:17:05 Marcin
00:17:05 Marcin
00:17:05 Marcin
00:17:07 Marcin
00:17:07 Marcin
00:17:07 Marcin
00:17:08 Marcin
00:17:08 Marcin
00:17:08 Marcin
00:17:08 Marcin
00:17:08 Marcin

damn

twipley · Post by **twipley** » 29 Oct 2012, 16:50

Mielz wrote:Level 53, Hooked:
00:17:034 Marcin // new
00:17:039 Marcin // old

So... new WR?

Mielz · Post by **Mielz** » 29 Oct 2012, 21:35

Should I send it to px so he does update my 17.03 to a 17.03?

Morgan · Post by **Morgan** » 29 Oct 2012, 21:35

twipley · Post by **twipley** » 29 Oct 2012, 22:32

yes. and tell him to include more precision.

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 30 Oct 2012, 00:54

twipley wrote:yes. and tell him to include more precision. :)

nah, there's been plenty of discussion about this and the community (admins or whoever) decided not to include the third decimal place, at least for now and in the current system
(though i suppose it could be easily implemented in the hypothetical modified elma 2.0)

trew · Post by **trew** » 30 Oct 2012, 08:54

faster time is faster time, no matter the official table being updated.

Gratz for improved wr!

Bjenn · Post by **Bjenn** » 30 Oct 2012, 09:08

Rec or didn't happen.

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 17 Dec 2012, 04:56

Level 44, Freefall:
00:11:51 milagros
00:11:52 milagros
00:11:52 milagros
00:11:53 milagros
00:11:54 milagros
00:11:54 milagros
00:11:54 milagros
00:11:54 milagros
00:11:54 milagros
00:11:54 milagros

damez, no lucky run yet