When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Look for replays and levels and ask people's times.

Moderator: Moporators

User avatar
Juski
Kuski
Posts: 2200
Joined: 26 Dec 2003, 20:53
Location: irc://irc.ircnet.org/ranks

When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by Juski »

- 45 Minutes: KingKong, 11 Mar 2000
- 44 Minutes: Champi0N, 5 Apr 2000
- 43 Minutes: KingKong, 4 Jun 2000
- 42 Minutes: zyntifox, 21 Nov 2000
- 41 Minutes: pajen, 14 Oct 2001
- 40 Minutes: dz, 2 May 2002
- 39 Minutes: TorInge, 11 April 2003
- 38 Minutes: Zweq, 28 Sep 2003
- 37 Minutes: TorInge, 16 Mar 2005
EDIT:MISTAKE:- 36 Minutes: John, 15 Jun 2007
Should have put dates of when wr tt went under the limits instead :x


Everytime this question comes up most people always say "Impsy under next minute limit". Few people, including me, have always said ez possible. Even now i still think it is possible, but as we see above it will take longer and longer for each limit we brake. And in 4 years who knows what will be of the scene, this is the first time i doubt next limit actuly will be broken, although still highly possible.

So what do you think? How long until we get under 35 min? Will we get under 35 min?
Last edited by Juski on 18 Jun 2007, 17:33, edited 1 time in total.
No regrets Image
Are you LOST?
User avatar
Zweq
34mins club
Posts: 4055
Joined: 28 Nov 2002, 15:54
Location: suo mesta

Post by Zweq »

already said in other thread that it's useless to think too far because all the guesses you get are "impossible lol nab juski".

it wont happen, not because it isn't possible, but because 2 active internalists cant do it
Image
User avatar
John
first 35tt
Posts: 4738
Joined: 28 Sep 2002, 19:42
Team: WNO
Location: Luleå, Sweden

Post by John »

didnt know i was under 36
Image
Marvin
Kuski
Posts: 44
Joined: 27 Dec 2002, 00:40
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by Marvin »

John wrote:didnt know i was under 36
But apparently you are. Congratulations! :wink:
teajay
Donator duck
Posts: 10043
Joined: 3 Apr 2003, 17:53

Post by teajay »

Wow, John, well done. :lol2:
User avatar
jaytea
37mins club
Posts: 1015
Joined: 22 May 2004, 08:45

Post by jaytea »

rofl, juski i wonder what you think those limits/players mean
User avatar
Memphis
37mins club
Posts: 1907
Joined: 28 Feb 2003, 13:35
Location: B.C. Canada
Contact:

Post by Memphis »

congratz Johnny! you got under 36 very ez. Ummm anyway about this negativity towards the next limit break im saying ez yes and you know why, because peeps like john and zweg are still shaving hella time off of their internals each week. It is when the wrs are going down by .01 of a second that we are close to the limit. Once again gratz johnny.
Religious Man
|| TT: 37:47:70 || EX New Wave WR + Animal Farm WR || 24 Canadian Records || TEC Bronze Medal || HHIT in the 37min club || http://elastomaster.tripod.com/
||
Image
WkE
Kuski
Posts: 1173
Joined: 9 Apr 2003, 17:08
Location: Israel
Contact:

Post by WkE »

Memphis wrote: It is when the wrs are going down by .01 of a second that we are close to the limit.
not necessarily.
look here on the period between tables 205 and 226 - 7 months, and only 4 seconds improvement. It's a third from the last WR table alone, which had to deal with much more "advanced" WRs.

So slow improvement might as well indicate inactivity.

And grats John. Really impressive tightness bewteen your TT and wr TT.
TT: 43:03.93 | AVG: 47:03.65 | Image | Team Site [TR] || TR Forum | 1 Pro, 27 Good, 26 OK
User avatar
Zweq
34mins club
Posts: 4055
Joined: 28 Nov 2002, 15:54
Location: suo mesta

Post by Zweq »

gz john!
Image
User avatar
milagros
Cheatless
Posts: 4560
Joined: 19 May 2002, 17:05

Post by milagros »

lol this john 35 ez talk
[carebox]
User avatar
enil
Kuski
Posts: 311
Joined: 26 Apr 2005, 14:07
Location: Fjelstervang
Contact:

Post by enil »

well, if they keep up ar this rate, maybe 4 years. if john and zweq dont, then never i guess
User avatar
SveinR
Moporator
Posts: 5469
Joined: 21 May 2002, 08:05
Location: Oslo, Norway
Contact:

Post by SveinR »

Look, John's TT is 36:19 not 35.xx. Of course 36:19 is an absolutely brilliant TT, but I don't know what Juski is thinking of.
Was it cast for the mass who burn and toil?
Or for the vultures who thirst for blood and oil?
Rules | FAQ
User avatar
The_BoneLESS
38mins club
Posts: 4604
Joined: 7 Sep 2003, 00:30
Team: HHIT
Location: Dangerously close to the St-Lawrence River
Contact:

Post by The_BoneLESS »

SveinR wrote:Look, John's TT is 36:19 not 35.xx. Of course 36:19 is an absolutely brilliant TT, but I don't know what Juski is thinking of.
I think it's because one of John's time got the WR tt under 36 that Juski thinks that way.
Website || TT:38:05:33 || WC5:15th || HHIT for life || 9th world wide ... BAP is next
User avatar
Zweq
34mins club
Posts: 4055
Joined: 28 Nov 2002, 15:54
Location: suo mesta

Post by Zweq »

well then the other dates are wrong because those are personal minute breaks and wr tt was always under weeks/months before that.

I considered it as some bad joke.
Image
User avatar
Memphis
37mins club
Posts: 1907
Joined: 28 Feb 2003, 13:35
Location: B.C. Canada
Contact:

Post by Memphis »

I think it was zwegs hiflyer as well that brought it under wasn't it?
Religious Man
|| TT: 37:47:70 || EX New Wave WR + Animal Farm WR || 24 Canadian Records || TEC Bronze Medal || HHIT in the 37min club || http://elastomaster.tripod.com/
||
Image
User avatar
The_BoneLESS
38mins club
Posts: 4604
Joined: 7 Sep 2003, 00:30
Team: HHIT
Location: Dangerously close to the St-Lawrence River
Contact:

Post by The_BoneLESS »

Memphis wrote:I think it was zwegs hiflyer as well that brought it under wasn't it?
think you're right. Just some stupid comment by Juski :x
Website || TT:38:05:33 || WC5:15th || HHIT for life || 9th world wide ... BAP is next
teajay
Donator duck
Posts: 10043
Joined: 3 Apr 2003, 17:53

Post by teajay »

come on guys, didn't we all know juski just foaled us/foaled himself?
User avatar
Xiphias
39mins club
Posts: 4098
Joined: 23 Nov 2004, 23:05

Post by Xiphias »

enough bs.. :P

Elma tt will be under 35mins when I start playing elma again. And John has gotten 35mins total time before the end of this year.
Thorze wrote:I just wanted to make a cool topic like Juish have cool topics..
User avatar
Juski
Kuski
Posts: 2200
Joined: 26 Dec 2003, 20:53
Location: irc://irc.ircnet.org/ranks

Post by Juski »

After making such an embarassing mistake it's even worse i'm away for so long before noticing it. At the moment of posting first post i thought the minute limit brakers was the ones who got the total time under.
No regrets Image
Are you LOST?
WkE
Kuski
Posts: 1173
Joined: 9 Apr 2003, 17:08
Location: Israel
Contact:

Post by WkE »

anyway, under 35 minutes in January 2010.

and no, I do not begin my post with "if no one will be active..." or "depends on new versions and left alovolt" or the infamous "never!! impsy!". come on people, it's guessing, play the game.
TT: 43:03.93 | AVG: 47:03.65 | Image | Team Site [TR] || TR Forum | 1 Pro, 27 Good, 26 OK
teajay
Donator duck
Posts: 10043
Joined: 3 Apr 2003, 17:53

Post by teajay »

OK, guessing then. I say this:

9th march 2012, table #429
User avatar
Lukazz
36mins club
Posts: 5241
Joined: 4 Jul 2004, 12:10

Post by Lukazz »

i think december 2009
TT: 36:59:53 || Avg TT: 38:09:65
User avatar
Polarix
Kuski
Posts: 995
Joined: 7 Jun 2007, 20:35
Team: TR
Location: Sandnes, Norway

Post by Polarix »

april 2010
Image
User avatar
milagros
Cheatless
Posts: 4560
Joined: 19 May 2002, 17:05

Post by milagros »

Juski wrote:After making such an embarassing mistake it's even worse i'm away for so long before noticing it. At the moment of posting first post i thought the minute limit brakers was the ones who got the total time under.
then it was zweq this time:)
[carebox]
User avatar
Juski
Kuski
Posts: 2200
Joined: 26 Dec 2003, 20:53
Location: irc://irc.ircnet.org/ranks

Post by Juski »

milagros wrote:
Juski wrote:After making such an embarassing mistake it's even worse i'm away for so long before noticing it. At the moment of posting first post i thought the minute limit brakers was the ones who got the total time under.
then it was zweq this time:)
Once again my bad. Thought zweq mentioned john's run took it under :/
No regrets Image
Are you LOST?
User avatar
John
first 35tt
Posts: 4738
Joined: 28 Sep 2002, 19:42
Team: WNO
Location: Luleå, Sweden

Post by John »

Code: Select all

WRtt
- 44 Minutes: #002, 12 March 2000
- 43 Minutes: #004, 24 March 2000
- 42 Minutes: #020, 4 June 2000
- 41 Minutes: #049, 10 December 2000
- 40 Minutes: #077, 2 December 2001
- 39 Minutes: #099, 27 October 2002
- 38 Minutes: #135, 14 July 2003
- 37 Minutes: #189, 31 October 2004
- 36 Minutes: #265, 15 June 2007
Image
User avatar
milagros
Cheatless
Posts: 4560
Joined: 19 May 2002, 17:05

Post by milagros »

Juski wrote:
milagros wrote:
Juski wrote:After making such an embarassing mistake it's even worse i'm away for so long before noticing it. At the moment of posting first post i thought the minute limit brakers was the ones who got the total time under.
then it was zweq this time:)
Once again my bad. Thought zweq mentioned john's run took it under :/
no it was zweq's hifly
first he made 31.30, then john 1.15.25 in ah, wr tt was 36.00.24 and then zweq drove 30.66
[carebox]
User avatar
milagros
Cheatless
Posts: 4560
Joined: 19 May 2002, 17:05

Post by milagros »

back to topic :
I guess never, it took 3 years to do last minute break, there are only two players that can improve more than some 0.xx and it would take some 5-6 years for them and I guess they will loose motivation
and of course much better possible, only it won't be ever done:/
[carebox]
User avatar
Ramone
50mins club
Posts: 1966
Joined: 20 May 2002, 15:42

Post by Ramone »

many players can improve wr´s with over a second.
Elasto Mania - ez better
User avatar
milagros
Cheatless
Posts: 4560
Joined: 19 May 2002, 17:05

Post by milagros »

ramone wrote:many players can improve wr´s with over a second.
the problem is that same wr:)
[carebox]
User avatar
Zweq
34mins club
Posts: 4055
Joined: 28 Nov 2002, 15:54
Location: suo mesta

Post by Zweq »

milagros wrote:
ramone wrote:many players can improve wr´s with over a second.
the problem is that same wr:)
no the problem is that they dont try and say internals are höyled to max
Image
User avatar
berhabdul
Banned
Posts: 1125
Joined: 18 Jul 2005, 17:09
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Contact:

Post by berhabdul »

very nice indeed. can i have sex with your dad now?
User avatar
Mawane
Kuski
Posts: 3299
Joined: 15 Apr 2007, 01:05
Team: SV
Contact:

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by Mawane »

#290: 35:49,75
only 49,76 left, go go go! i know its passibel
Website || TT:41:45:64 || Team Image
Image[url=steam://friends/add/76561198025490048]Image[/url]
User avatar
itoanuak
Kuski
Posts: 36
Joined: 13 Sep 2008, 00:56

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by itoanuak »

pasibel but maybe on a dildo bike :lol:
User avatar
Schumi
39mins club
Posts: 866
Joined: 27 Jul 2003, 06:44
Location: Ikrény, Hungary

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by Schumi »

zweq do teh 00,02 on bounce back -> 34:59.99 :D
Elasto Mania - 34:22.20 | #416 - 12. April 2021
Ancient Internals
User avatar
Schumi
39mins club
Posts: 866
Joined: 27 Jul 2003, 06:44
Location: Ikrény, Hungary

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by Schumi »

My guesses :) Comment if you want.

Code: Select all

01. 00:13,98
02. 00:15,01
03. 00:17,78
04. 00:29,57
05. 00:19,84
06. 00:29,81
07. 00:27,22
08. 00:20,52
09. 00:53,67
10. 00:10,30
11. 00:22,83
12. 00:20,72
13. 00:13,92
14. 00:17,59
15. 00:48,89
16. 01:22,17
17. 00:53,84
18. 00:44,31
19. 00:35,90
20. 00:56,71
21. 00:14,37
22. 00:38,77
23. 00:35,86
24. 00:39,22
25. 00:24,16
26. 00:21,92
27. 00:33,84
28. 00:48,61
29. 00:41,93
30. 00:28,61
31. 01:11,21
32. 00:42,27
33. 00:53,61
34. 00:36,21
35. 02:11,26
36. 00:56,81
37. 00:52,41
38. 00:28,97
39. 00:38,24
40. 01:21,31
41. 00:38,54
42. 00:47,10
43. 00:55,86
44. 00:11,47
45. 00:32,46
46. 00:51,43
47. 00:19,14
48. 00:44,23
49. 00:37,68
50. 00:52,63
51. 00:42,21
52. 00:24,64
53. 00:17,11
54. 01:11,32
==========
TT: 34:59,99
Elasto Mania - 34:22.20 | #416 - 12. April 2021
Ancient Internals
User avatar
Zweq
34mins club
Posts: 4055
Joined: 28 Nov 2002, 15:54
Location: suo mesta

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by Zweq »

Schumi wrote:My guesses :) Comment if you want.

Code: Select all

01. 00:13,98 H C
02. 00:15,01 H C
03. 00:17,78 H C
04. 00:29,57 C
05. 00:19,84 C
06. 00:29,81 C
07. 00:27,22 C
08. 00:20,52 C
09. 00:53,67 H C
10. 00:10,30 no idea
11. 00:22,83 no idea
12. 00:20,72 no idea
13. 00:13,92 H C
14. 00:17,59 H C
15. 00:48,89 C
16. 01:22,17 C
17. 00:53,84 C 
18. 00:44,31 H C
19. 00:35,90 H C
20. 00:56,71 H C
21. 00:14,37 no idea, C
22. 00:38,77 H C
23. 00:35,86 H C
24. 00:39,22 C
25. 00:24,16 H C
26. 00:21,92 H C (ez 21.5x)
27. 00:33,84 C
28. 00:48,61 C
29. 00:41,93 C
30. 00:28,61 no idea
31. 01:11,21 C
32. 00:42,27 C
33. 00:53,61 H C
34. 00:36,21 C
35. 02:11,26 C
36. 00:56,81 H C
37. 00:52,41 C
38. 00:28,97 no idea
39. 00:38,24 C
40. 01:21,31 C
41. 00:38,54 H C
42. 00:47,10 H C
43. 00:55,86 C
44. 00:11,47 C                  ;D
45. 00:32,46 C
46. 00:51,43 C
47. 00:19,14 C
48. 00:44,23 H C
49. 00:37,68 C
50. 00:52,63 H C
51. 00:42,21 H C
52. 00:24,64 H C
53. 00:17,11 H C
54. 01:11,32 H C
==========
TT: 34:59,99
H = Human can do
C = Computer can do
just my five cents
Image
Ves
Kuski
Posts: 232
Joined: 13 Mar 2005, 03:15
Location: Kiev, Ukraine

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by Ves »

Hey, you personally promised 22,80 in Gravity Ride! Why now "no idea"?

Looks like you believe too much in computers :lol:
Through the externals to the skill.
Through the skill to the internals.
Through the internals to the divinity.
User avatar
Memphis
37mins club
Posts: 1907
Joined: 28 Feb 2003, 13:35
Location: B.C. Canada
Contact:

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by Memphis »

Ya we will get there. Probably somewhere around the time of 2014. Usually helps when someone finds a crazy time cut to a level or two because some of them predicted times on certain levels seem near crazy but then again who knows.
Religious Man
|| TT: 37:47:70 || EX New Wave WR + Animal Farm WR || 24 Canadian Records || TEC Bronze Medal || HHIT in the 37min club || http://elastomaster.tripod.com/
||
Image
User avatar
gimp
Kuski
Posts: 1140
Joined: 28 May 2007, 08:47

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by gimp »

double trouble seems the most unlikely to me....
God Bless America
User avatar
Xiphias
39mins club
Posts: 4098
Joined: 23 Nov 2004, 23:05

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by Xiphias »

Circuitous and free fall already beaten!
Thorze wrote:I just wanted to make a cool topic like Juish have cool topics..
teajay
Donator duck
Posts: 10043
Joined: 3 Apr 2003, 17:53

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by teajay »

hihi, always like when these guesses turn out to easy. :P
User avatar
Schumi
39mins club
Posts: 866
Joined: 27 Jul 2003, 06:44
Location: Ikrény, Hungary

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by Schumi »

Zweq wrote:

Code: Select all

44. 00:11,47 C                  ;D
H = Human can do
C = Computer can do
just my five cents
Huh? :D
Elasto Mania - 34:22.20 | #416 - 12. April 2021
Ancient Internals
western
Kuski
Posts: 225
Joined: 28 Sep 2008, 21:22

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by western »

Memphis wrote:Ya we will get there. Probably somewhere around the time of 2014. Usually helps when someone finds a crazy time cut to a level or two because some of them predicted times on certain levels seem near crazy but then again who knows.
My guess is around six years from now too. Maybe more, but if people keep hoyling it may reach 34:xx,xx. But never 33:xx,xx.

what do you think?
User avatar
Lukazz
36mins club
Posts: 5241
Joined: 4 Jul 2004, 12:10

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by Lukazz »

ye i think 34 will be reached in 5-10 years, 33 not
TT: 36:59:53 || Avg TT: 38:09:65
User avatar
Bismuth
Kuski
Posts: 2777
Joined: 26 Feb 2008, 07:11
Team: <3
Location: Not on lauta
Contact:

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by Bismuth »

I agree too. But hey, WR TT is now around 35:45, isn't it..? It's been almost a year and a half, and 15 secs... so yeah, 5 years is an OK guess.
:mrhat:
User avatar
Mawane
Kuski
Posts: 3299
Joined: 15 Apr 2007, 01:05
Team: SV
Contact:

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by Mawane »

i think WR TT will be 35 next year, seriously
with those 1-2s per WR update in average, i think its possible
Website || TT:41:45:64 || Team Image
Image[url=steam://friends/add/76561198025490048]Image[/url]
User avatar
pawq
38mins club
Posts: 6547
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 19:56
Team: TR
Location: Southampton, UK

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by pawq »

yea, wrs are made quite often these days, but notice that total improvement of every whole table stays around 0,4-0,5s so if every month there were 2 updates (1s) then during 1 year 12s would be cut off. in case of that i also guess its liek 4-5 years.
western
Kuski
Posts: 225
Joined: 28 Sep 2008, 21:22

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by western »

Mawane wrote:i think WR TT will be 35 next year, seriously
oh man, I've read "35 years" there. maybe it will take 35 years?
western
Kuski
Posts: 225
Joined: 28 Sep 2008, 21:22

Re: When will the WR TT be under 35?!

Post by western »

Mawane wrote:with those 1-2s per WR update in average, i think its possible
don't forget:
May: one update
June: one update
July: two updates
August: two updates
September: one update
October: two updates
November: oh updates

there have been nine updates in seven months­...
it's not the one-update-per-week we used to have! ;)

in fact, here's some data:
#265: 35:59,60 (June 2007)
#292: 35:49,19 (November 2008)
by the same pattern, give it close to ten years.
Post Reply