New internal times

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 9 Oct 2005, 20:21

wow

circa: 27:30, tried the bounce style

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 9 Oct 2005, 22:17

Lukazz wrote:wow

circa: 27:30, tried the bounce style

i hav 27.18 without bounce style

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 9 Oct 2005, 22:52

Serpents Tale - 59.59

Dynamo · Post by **Dynamo** » 10 Oct 2005, 03:08

CuLiNo wrote:
Lukazz wrote:wow

circa: 27:30, tried the bounce style
i hav 27.18 without bounce style

26,99 here

25 is possible

Tm · Post by Tm » 10 Oct 2005, 12:48

Expert System 57:66
Trix 47:13

petsen · Post by **petsen** » 11 Oct 2005, 03:18

serp 1.01.95 fucked the ending so bad hehe

1,01,16, ok ending rest sucky

Khempejjer · Post by **Khempejjer** » 11 Oct 2005, 15:53

Tag 21.38

Tm · Post by Tm » 11 Oct 2005, 16:12

Trix 46:46

Jazka · Post by **Jazka** » 11 Oct 2005, 17:25

Pipe: 33.81 --> 33.54 pro time

Freezen · Post by **Freezen** » 11 Oct 2005, 18:37

Uphill battle: 22.12 --> 21.81
Headbanger: 1.00.92 --> 56.90 --> 52.xx
Long haul: 34.48 --> 33.90
Tunnel terror: 1.06.72 --> 1.05.15 --> 1.04.45

Raven · Post by **Raven** » 11 Oct 2005, 21:55

Twin peaks: 18.16

Kopaka · Post by **Kopaka** » 12 Oct 2005, 14:12

uhh I made the new serp style

But with slow begining and on laptop so fucked up the part after hang too, got 1:07,12

Raven · Post by **Raven** » 12 Oct 2005, 15:27

twin: 18.15 :/

Tm · Post by Tm » 12 Oct 2005, 15:30

Bounce back 54:34 --> 53:51

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 12 Oct 2005, 16:37

Kopaka wrote:uhh I made the new serp style But with slow begining and on laptop so fucked up the part after hang too, got 1:07,12

new style? hmm

twipley · Post by **twipley** » 12 Oct 2005, 16:58

Kopaka wrote:uhh I made the new serp style But with slow begining and on laptop so fucked up the part after hang too, got 1:07,12

could, in your opinion, new style be any faster than older? in what conditions?

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 12 Oct 2005, 17:57

twipley wrote:
Kopaka wrote:uhh I made the new serp style But with slow begining and on laptop so fucked up the part after hang too, got 1:07,12
could, in your opinion, new style be any faster than older? in what conditions?

well I think, if you resample it like this:
Could, in your opinion, new style be faster than any older one?

Yes, it's certainly faster than some old styles. It's easier to get under a minute with this style than with the first style and even easier than the second major style that was used. It's not faster than the current WR-style though.

Raven · Post by **Raven** » 12 Oct 2005, 20:50

twin: 18.05 WC time

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 12 Oct 2005, 21:53

maybe i should try that serp style too

petsen · Post by **petsen** » 12 Oct 2005, 22:38

serp 59,79

finally under 1 min now for some improvement

1st impro = 59.59

Tm · Post by Tm » 13 Oct 2005, 05:01

Trix 45:80

infected · Post by **infected** » 13 Oct 2005, 11:36

got a computer wich can handle vsync off. so had to try how big diff elma is with it. so i started a new state for fun:

warm up: 14.09
twin peaks: 18.03
uphill: 20.72
hangman: 14.56

J-sim · Post by **J-sim** » 13 Oct 2005, 12:02

stANGer wrote:got a computer wich can handle vsync off. so had to try how big diff elma is with it. so i started a new state for fun:

warm up: 14.09
twin peaks: 18.03
uphill: 20.72
hangman: 14.56

with that rhetoric it seems like you made those times after playing around 10 minutes or so with your new computer. that would be sick! how long time did this actually take?

ps. i know it can really make a big difference to get a computer that can do vsync off properly. i could make lots of hard tricks suddenly that werent posible before. but it didnt help me make top10 times just like that

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 13 Oct 2005, 12:02

WTF amazing hangman and warm up

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 13 Oct 2005, 12:30

really nice times

infected · Post by **infected** » 13 Oct 2005, 12:31

J-sim wrote:
stANGer wrote:got a computer wich can handle vsync off. so had to try how big diff elma is with it. so i started a new state for fun:

warm up: 14.09
twin peaks: 18.03
uphill: 20.72
hangman: 14.56
with that rhetoric it seems like you made those times after playing around 10 minutes or so with your new computer. that would be sick! how long time did this actually take?

ps. i know it can really make a big difference to get a computer that can do vsync off properly. i could make lots of hard tricks suddenly that werent posible before. but it didnt help me make top10 times just like that

hangman took around 5mins, only got 4 finishes on it. warm up took around 30mins, got 14.11 pretty ez tho. but imo it feels like a big difference with vsync off :s especielly on those levels
1 new time: tag 21.34

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 13 Oct 2005, 14:05

stANGer wrote:got a computer wich can handle vsync off. so had to try how big diff elma is with it. so i started a new state for fun:

warm up: 14.09
twin peaks: 18.03
uphill: 20.72
hangman: 14.56

note the absence of a Flat Track time.... should Dariuz be worried ;o

incredible times infec

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 13 Oct 2005, 14:10

sierra wrote:
stANGer wrote:got a computer wich can handle vsync off. so had to try how big diff elma is with it. so i started a new state for fun:

warm up: 14.09
twin peaks: 18.03
uphill: 20.72
hangman: 14.56
note the absence of a Flat Track time.... should Dariuz be worried ;o

incredible times infec

flattrack is vsync on lev i think...

Kestas · Post by **Kestas** » 13 Oct 2005, 15:19

Level 54, Apple Harvest:
01:49:56 Kestas
01:54:78 Kestas

what a level :S

Quinn · Post by **Quinn** » 13 Oct 2005, 18:18

13. Hill Legend: 16.81

47. Enigma: 19.89

Jarkko · Post by **Jarkko** » 13 Oct 2005, 18:36

42. enduro: 54:30

and again another 50+ WR

TT: 50:03:62

edit: 53:35
edit2: 52:72

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 13 Oct 2005, 20:13

LOOOOL
apple harvest: 1:51
so sucky end and middle, easy 1:48

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 13 Oct 2005, 21:21

Played some Animal Farm to achieve a better top10, but I beat my best accidentally.

1:34,62 to 1:33,56

Khempejjer · Post by **Khempejjer** » 13 Oct 2005, 22:34

I can prove that infected ran his times less than a hour...
I ran 21.38 on Tag, then he started to play that lev. He said he has never played it, and after 5 mins he got 21.42... And on the next day, after some minutes' playing, he has almost beaten my warm up time ...
After that, for the 4th finished run, he did 14.56 on hangman...
He has omg skillz...
*bow*

petsen · Post by **petsen** » 14 Oct 2005, 01:14

serp 59,10

Quinn · Post by **Quinn** » 14 Oct 2005, 10:02

37. Jaws: 57.50

TT: 39.06.61

Edit: 57.31 with max sax end, could have been 56.8x

Edit2: hill legend 16.43

Jazka · Post by **Jazka** » 14 Oct 2005, 14:59

Haircut: 46.21 --> 45.21 just tried a bit...

Quinn · Post by **Quinn** » 14 Oct 2005, 15:36

37. Jaws: 57.08

no bounce ofcoz

York · Post by **York** » 14 Oct 2005, 18:27

29. HeadBanger 49:85

max sax ride
Not satisfied...

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 14 Oct 2005, 19:24

hill legend - 18,43 waw good time

Tm · Post by Tm » 14 Oct 2005, 19:32

Slalom 41:23

Ramzi · Post by **Ramzi** » 14 Oct 2005, 21:21

Framework - 39.66
Next World Class...

Raven · Post by **Raven** » 14 Oct 2005, 22:40

flat trak: 16.20

twipley · Post by **twipley** » 15 Oct 2005, 00:25

spiral 46:48

I don't bother going further, but still good improvement from previous record

ead · Post by **ead** » 15 Oct 2005, 00:30

serp 1:01,37

Quinn · Post by **Quinn** » 15 Oct 2005, 11:41

37. Jaws: 56.97 no bounce

edit: 56.77

sierra · Post by **sierra** » 15 Oct 2005, 15:13

Quinn wrote:37. Jaws: 56.97 no bounce

edit: 56.77

dame! rec?

edit: first try of the day and 17.01 Hill Legend

Tm · Post by Tm » 15 Oct 2005, 15:58

AH 1:42:25

Rasken · Post by **Rasken** » 15 Oct 2005, 16:04

Animal Farm: 1,27,05

ead · Post by **ead** » 15 Oct 2005, 16:21

fruit in the den 1:14,xx -> 1:04,28

one beginner time gone

New internal times

kopa magic

Re: kopa magic

Re: kopa magic

Re: kopa magic