33wrtt project

Look for replays and levels and ask people's times.

Moderator: Moporators

User avatar
ArZeNiK
38mins club
Posts: 690
Joined: 30 Jul 2016, 09:18
Team: Ferrari

Re: 33wrtt project

Post by ArZeNiK » 12 Feb 2018, 15:55

i think .59 is reasonable for flat trak
hi im arzenik :>
september 23th 2017 never forget
Image

iltsu
39mins club
Posts: 203
Joined: 25 Aug 2011, 19:15
Team: EF

Re: 33wrtt project

Post by iltsu » 12 Feb 2018, 17:44

TGR wrote:
12 Feb 2018, 15:55
i think .59 is reasonable for flat trak
No it isnt

ile
Kuski
Posts: 138
Joined: 11 Feb 2014, 16:56

Re: 33wrtt project

Post by ile » 14 Feb 2018, 02:21

iltsu wrote:
12 Feb 2018, 17:44
TGR wrote:
12 Feb 2018, 15:55
i think .59 is reasonable for flat trak
No it isnt
Spef's 14.64 was near perfect run then :?:

iltsu
39mins club
Posts: 203
Joined: 25 Aug 2011, 19:15
Team: EF

Re: 33wrtt project

Post by iltsu » 14 Feb 2018, 07:49

Yes ofc 0.05s better is VERY EZ pos. Spef only hoyled style like 1 or 2 months and has 500 better times than world top2. Saveload wr is 0.01s better. I dont say .64 is perfect run, but i dont see how 0.05s better is reasonable.

User avatar
Tigro
Kuski
Posts: 2163
Joined: 6 Jan 2009, 13:08
Team: Valan?
Location: Srdcom vychodniar
Contact:

Re: 33wrtt project

Post by Tigro » 14 Feb 2018, 11:31

Even if it was, it's just 0.05 after all, and it wouldn't contribute to 33wrtt that significantly.
Image

User avatar
Zero
Kuski
Posts: 536
Joined: 19 Feb 2010, 14:16

Re: 33wrtt project

Post by Zero » 14 Feb 2018, 13:16

iltsu wrote:
14 Feb 2018, 07:49
Yes ofc 0.05s better is VERY EZ pos. Spef only hoyled style like 1 or 2 months and has 500 better times than world top2. Saveload wr is 0.01s better. I dont say .64 is perfect run, but i dont see how 0.05s better is reasonable.
These kind of posts has been seen here since like 2000 and now we simply chuckle at the old predictions.

You can always improve. That's the nature of elma
:bear: Image Image Image :bear:

User avatar
bene
Hot kuski
Posts: 889
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 23:33
Team: dat
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: 33wrtt project

Post by bene » 14 Feb 2018, 13:31

0.05 in every level adds up quickly to a second or two :bear:
Image
Image
Image
Signatür ruined by SveinR - smaller plz :*

iltsu
39mins club
Posts: 203
Joined: 25 Aug 2011, 19:15
Team: EF

Re: 33wrtt project

Post by iltsu » 14 Feb 2018, 16:48

If 0.05s improve is reasonable in int2, then lets just cut 0.5s from longer levs because its relatively as possible. Ez 33wrtt then. Sounds reasonable to me.

User avatar
Schumi
39mins club
Posts: 842
Joined: 27 Jul 2003, 06:44
Location: Ikrény, Hungary

Re: 33wrtt project

Post by Schumi » 14 Feb 2018, 16:54

what is Spef's SL time on Flaktrak? can't believe its only 0,01 better than WR....
Elasto Mania - 34:26.58 | #412 - 11. June 2020
Ancient Internals

User avatar
ArZeNiK
38mins club
Posts: 690
Joined: 30 Jul 2016, 09:18
Team: Ferrari

Re: 33wrtt project

Post by ArZeNiK » 14 Feb 2018, 17:44

Schumi wrote:
14 Feb 2018, 16:54
what is Spef's SL time on Flaktrak? can't believe its only 0,01 better than WR....
böne accidentally showed teh on livestream and it's not .63 now
hi im arzenik :>
september 23th 2017 never forget
Image

User avatar
bene
Hot kuski
Posts: 889
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 23:33
Team: dat
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: 33wrtt project

Post by bene » 7 Mar 2018, 21:52

TGR wrote:
14 Feb 2018, 17:44
böne accidentally showed teh on livestream and it's not .63 now
it's true i accidentally showed rec names on stream. Quite many more than 02 I should add :bear: Doesn't say anything about quality or shampooing or fps changes or whatever tricks can be in them. You can't reasonably guess any time by a rec name alone.
Image
Image
Image
Signatür ruined by SveinR - smaller plz :*

User avatar
Tm
36mins club
Posts: 584
Joined: 13 Feb 2005, 15:08
Team: EF

Re: 33wrtt project

Post by Tm » 15 Jul 2018, 14:34

Nothing much happened during 395-400 tablets:
- danitah improved int01 to 13:88;
- zweq improved int05 to 19.76 and int53 to 16.39.
- some measly attempts to get close to other times (could mention: int35, int39, int41, int45, int48, int51).

target tt down to 34.09.99 (see first post as usual).

From now on, see you every 5 tablets.
Image

User avatar
Tm
36mins club
Posts: 584
Joined: 13 Feb 2005, 15:08
Team: EF

Re: 33wrtt project

Post by Tm » 9 Feb 2019, 12:22

Good progress with 402 tablet:
- First time in the history of 33wrtt targets certain target was embarrassed. Thanks to Spef and his 38,73 on Tricks Abound. Target was 41,09;
- FinMan engraved his nickname with 28,43 on Pipe. Target was - 28,56.

Honorable mention:
- Zweq closened Turnaround with his 35,46. Target - 35,43.

Target tt down to 34:07,52.

Have an day!
Image

User avatar
Schumi
39mins club
Posts: 842
Joined: 27 Jul 2003, 06:44
Location: Ikrény, Hungary

Re: 33wrtt project

Post by Schumi » 23 Feb 2019, 21:48

could you please megapros try to do this 48.9x on Ziggy?

http://recs.zamppe.com/replays/678/show?33T495x

Megabounce can be ~1 sec faster: -0.9 sec
50.84 rec has 0.35sec better start: -0.35
finish part on 50.84 has 0.65 advance: -0.65

this means -1.9 sec = 48.9x
Elasto Mania - 34:26.58 | #412 - 11. June 2020
Ancient Internals

User avatar
Tm
36mins club
Posts: 584
Joined: 13 Feb 2005, 15:08
Team: EF

Re: 33wrtt project

Post by Tm » 8 Jun 2019, 17:50

bene ruled out int44 with 406 tablet, beating imposed target by 0,01. :wink:

Not much else going on, regarding closement to other targets.
Image

User avatar
Tm
36mins club
Posts: 584
Joined: 13 Feb 2005, 15:08
Team: EF

Re: 33wrtt project

Post by Tm » 11 Aug 2019, 12:21

Mielz exacted enigma on 19,13 and closed haircuts GAP. :idea:
Image

User avatar
Tm
36mins club
Posts: 584
Joined: 13 Feb 2005, 15:08
Team: EF

Re: 33wrtt project

Post by Tm » 21 Jun 2020, 13:52

First post updated with the latest times according to WR table of the number of 412.

After good cruise through all internals it seems to me that:
- Labyrinth Pro WR should be 2.10,xx as well as New Wave WR should be timed around 1.21.8x;
- Precarious WR is one the toughest to mess around;
- Twin Peaks, Islands in the Sky, Sink and Jaws targets are a bit too nasty, but watahel let it stay this way;
- Quick Round should be without fear attempted at skill level of 34.9x;
- Expert System is very promising 49,low.

See you again in two years after 10 years anniversary of this extremely successful discus thread :wink2:
Image

Post Reply