Total Time

Internal level specific topics

Moderators: John, Moporators

Post Reply
User avatar
John
first 35tt
Posts: 4627
Joined: 28 Sep 2002, 19:42
Team: WNO
Location: Luleå, Sweden

Total Time

Post by John » 16 Apr 2013, 15:51

The current Top100 TTs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
¬ Minute limit breakers

36 Minutes:
John, 13 Jul 2009

37 Minutes:
TorInge, 16 Mar 2005

38 Minutes:
Zweq, 28 Sep 2003

39 Minutes:
TorInge, 11 April 2003

40 Minutes:
dz, 2 May 2002

41 Minutes:
pajen, 14 Oct 2001

42 Minutes:
zyntifox, 21 Nov 2000

43 Minutes:
KingKong, 4 Jun 2000

44 Minutes:
Champi0N, 5 Apr 2000

45 Minutes:
KingKong, 11 Mar 2000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Image

User avatar
dawid
Kuski
Posts: 171
Joined: 10 May 2014, 19:23

Re: Total Time

Post by dawid » 21 Jul 2016, 21:25

How about adding Tutors tiems to TT? Tutors can be dealt as internals cuz they were in original elma since the beginning.

User avatar
8-ball
39mins club
Posts: 4463
Joined: 9 May 2003, 13:30
Team: BAP
Location: Valmiera, Latvia

Re: Total Time

Post by 8-ball » 21 Jul 2016, 22:57

wat
39:37,91

User avatar
dawid
Kuski
Posts: 171
Joined: 10 May 2014, 19:23

Re: Total Time

Post by dawid » 6 Aug 2016, 15:00

8-ball wrote:wat
whole discussion about Tutors...


Can anyone tell me why int WR recs are not published up to date? They should be published as a proof of WR. In every other game/sport WRs are published.

User avatar
Ruben
Kuski
Posts: 727
Joined: 31 Dec 2012, 18:07
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Total Time

Post by Ruben » 6 Aug 2016, 15:01

dawid wrote:
8-ball wrote:wat
whole discussion about Tutors...


Can anyone tell me why int WR recs are not published up to date? They should be published as a proof of WR. In every other game/sport WRs are published.
Because then someone can ezily steal style and make .01 faster.
My fake plants died because I did not pretend to water them.

User avatar
dawid
Kuski
Posts: 171
Joined: 10 May 2014, 19:23

Re: Total Time

Post by dawid » 6 Aug 2016, 15:54

Ruben wrote:
dawid wrote:Can anyone tell me why int WR recs are not published up to date? They should be published as a proof of WR. In every other game/sport WRs are published.
Because then someone can ezily steal style and make .01 faster.
And? This is the goal of this game, the fastest time.
It would be nice to see new EDQ.

Post Reply