w3c

wwwDotcoM · Post by **wwwDotcoM** » 22 Jul 2006, 22:00

valid page and no

to brag about it

respect

...

Grace · Post by **Grace** » 23 Jul 2006, 07:00

I Don't get it

jaytea · Post by **jaytea** » 23 Jul 2006, 09:50

he's just trying to show off knowledge of w3c standard or something.. forgetting that 99.9% of the users wouldnt care whether this site was compliant with the standard or not (or of course, dont know what that means)

Post by **Abula** » 23 Jul 2006, 13:20

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHTML#Vali ... _documents

"In a perfect world, all browsers would follow the web standards and valid documents would predictably render on every browser and platform."

I'm trying to make Moposite accessible in cell phones and other devices. Because it's interesting. I'm not telling it should be priority in Moposite work, but I just like that area too much.

Moposite has been valid since 2002 or something.

And yes, isn't just cool to not brag about things like this and get the attention from someone else? ;P

wwwDotcoM · Post by **wwwDotcoM** » 24 Jul 2006, 15:30

jaytea: I'm not showing off anything. It IS respectful having maintained a valid site "since 2002 or something" and not bragging about it, considering that sites like Google or Yahoo for example are not w3c compliant.

And for those who "Don't know what that means" just ignore the topic, and leave it for those who do. The main person it was meant for, accepted (I hope) my grats.

Post by **Abula** » 9 Aug 2006, 23:44

Heh yea, it was very nice to read :].