Reaction Time Test
Moderator: Moporators
Reaction Time Test
http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime
first average was 271ms.
second average was 286ms.
third was 282ms.
average on the website is 215ms so i guess i am kinda slow :/ using the click button on laptop no mouse
first average was 271ms.
second average was 286ms.
third was 282ms.
average on the website is 215ms so i guess i am kinda slow :/ using the click button on laptop no mouse
God Bless America
Re: Reaction Time Test
265ms, i wonder how much height, length of limbs matter etc or is it neglibible
-
- 39mins club
- Posts: 423
- Joined: 12 May 2009, 15:28
- Location: A "child friendly" neighbourhood;o
Re: Reaction Time Test
reason for low median is the thousands of people using a triggerbot for it
RIP enthusiast claim image:(
Re: Reaction Time Test
First time: Measured a Reaction Time of 259.0ms, first two clicks were ~285ms :S but last three were ~230-250ms
Like anything else you can just train to become MASTER CLICKER
Second time: Measured a Reaction Time of 224.0ms
Like anything else you can just train to become MASTER CLICKER
Second time: Measured a Reaction Time of 224.0ms
Thorze wrote:I just wanted to make a cool topic like Juish have cool topics..
Re: Reaction Time Test
Nice tests, did each of them a few times
Number Memory
8 digits / 30%
Reaction Time
231 ms / 77%
Verbal Memory
102 points / 95%
Visual Memory
39645 points / 93%
Seems like I'm not good with numbers..
Number Memory
8 digits / 30%
Reaction Time
231 ms / 77%
Verbal Memory
102 points / 95%
Visual Memory
39645 points / 93%
Seems like I'm not good with numbers..
< roopemies> horror and frustrating and can't play, sounds just like you
Beer battle winner 2014 and 2015
Beer battle winner 2014 and 2015
Re: Reaction Time Test
First attempt got the average of 274. After that 245.
Noticed that spinning the cursor while waiting helps me Otherwise I will just freeze.
edit: Played for a while and managed to get a reaction time of 19ms Pure luck tho
Noticed that spinning the cursor while waiting helps me Otherwise I will just freeze.
edit: Played for a while and managed to get a reaction time of 19ms Pure luck tho
Rank #1 battler and the champion of BOSS cup
36 club since 02/2024
36 club since 02/2024
Re: Reaction Time Test
I'm bad reactionist, but tried others:
Verbal memory 143 / 99 % first try
Visual memory 53515 / 96 % first try
Number 10 digits / 82 % a coupel tries
Verbal memory 143 / 99 % first try
Visual memory 53515 / 96 % first try
Number 10 digits / 82 % a coupel tries
Re: Reaction Time Test
Number memory: 11 digits first try
Reaction time: 240ms on average
Verbal memory: 242 words first try
Reaction time: 240ms on average
Verbal memory: 242 words first try
Last edited by Madness on 14 Nov 2015, 00:55, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Reaction Time Test
tryed couple times
numer memory: 12 digits
reaction time: 177ms
verbal memory: 198
visual memory: 60642
numer memory: 12 digits
reaction time: 177ms
verbal memory: 198
visual memory: 60642
status:ONLINE - - - drinking:GOFE - - - iq:85 - - - elasto mania ranking:#1
Re: Reaction Time Test
vtf geniuse's im a idiot in everything except visual memory
Re: Reaction Time Test
Did first try everywhere, cba to hoyl this shit. Imo pos to do like 100 in number if learn some techniks in couple days, under 200 in reaction (but it wont improve reaction in general) and shit fucking ton in visual memory. Duno about verbal, for some reason it irritates the hell out of me.
number: 16
reaction: 259ms
verbal: 49
visual: 37196
number: 16
reaction: 259ms
verbal: 49
visual: 37196
Re: Reaction Time Test
Idk how 16 numbers anp. I also am surprised how bad I am at visual memory compared to all of you. As far as verbal memory though I felt like I was good at it and got 255 words my first try and then never did it again, most of it was intuition, perhaps there is a language barrier for some of you. Numbers I averaged at 9, learned some memory technique after a little bit and also saying it out loud. Visual I think my highest was some 18000 or something, maybe try again later.
God Bless America
Re: Reaction Time Test
3 averages: 268 258 273 with a few 230-240s in there
how the fuk do u do 177 ms
edit: lowest legit 220, highest legit ~320 (some unfocus or w/e)
editedit: first tries: numbers 13, verbal memory 57
how the fuk do u do 177 ms
edit: lowest legit 220, highest legit ~320 (some unfocus or w/e)
editedit: first tries: numbers 13, verbal memory 57
Re: Reaction Time Test
Did all first try on morn brane:
John: lol hittade ett popcorn i naveln
(19:52:06) (@Madnezz) The Golden Apple Award goes to.....
(19:52:36) (@Madnezz) ib9814.lev by igge!!!
(19:52:06) (@Madnezz) The Golden Apple Award goes to.....
(19:52:36) (@Madnezz) ib9814.lev by igge!!!
Zweq wrote:99.9999% of nabs haven't even opened the book yet and most of those that have are still on the first pages
Re: Reaction Time Test
Seems I has slow working memorising brain
Re: Reaction Time Test
repeating double digits in groups of 4 in head like 21745632: 21 74 21 74 21 74 // 56 32 56 32 56 32
Re: Reaction Time Test
Pretty much the same tactic I use, impsy 21. I also often assign a number to an Internal level in Elma and then remember the name of the level instead, is this strange? If Elma had 9xx Internals, I believe I could beat you!
Re: Reaction Time Test
Random first try today, never höyled anything.
Re: Reaction Time Test
This thing seems to depend on the PC you're using (or browser or something I dunno). I'm getting average 2xx on one and 4xx on another.
- Grace
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4849
- Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
- Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.
Re: Reaction Time Test
It doesn't take into account monitor delay etc. Most monitors have a regular delay of 30ms (unless you have a great gaming monitor) so you could consider yourself roughly 30ms faster on average.
Also the median of 215ms is just not accurate. Take a look at their Statistics page. For each distribution (monthly, yearly, all-time) you'll see that a median of 215ms puts the median value at between 1-1.5 standard deviations below the mean in each curve, not even taking into account the skew towards higher numbers. The median is more likely about 255-265ms from the data they've provided.
In another news, 243ms over 50 tests.
Also the median of 215ms is just not accurate. Take a look at their Statistics page. For each distribution (monthly, yearly, all-time) you'll see that a median of 215ms puts the median value at between 1-1.5 standard deviations below the mean in each curve, not even taking into account the skew towards higher numbers. The median is more likely about 255-265ms from the data they've provided.
In another news, 243ms over 50 tests.
Cyberscore!
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
Re: Reaction Time Test
hahaha I always do this whenever see number below 56 aswell. ah clock is; Upside down: Gravity rideMadness wrote:Pretty much the same tactic I use, impsy 21. I also often assign a number to an Internal level in Elma and then remember the name of the level instead, is this strange? If Elma had 9xx Internals, I believe I could beat you!