IMDB votelists

Discuss, argue, whine, talk but not about Elma.

Moderator: Moporators

Post Reply
User avatar
pawq
39mins club
Posts: 6003
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 19:56
Team: TR
Location: Southampton, UK

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by pawq » 18 Oct 2018, 16:47

Mary and the Witch's Flower (2017) - 6/10
A pretty enjoyable anime feature, but nowhere near the Ghibli classics.

Hell or High Water (2016) - 6/10
Very well-acted kinda modern western, with an engaging and emotional enough story. Unfortunately, both the characters and the story were rather flat, nothing particularly exciting. Still, worth a watch maybe, but I wouldn't say it's worth the Best Film oscar nomination.

Assassin's Creed (2016) - 5/10
This was actually better than expected. I think it's probably at least partly because I've played the first few games, so I'm familiar with the story and the concepts and they make sense in my head. But I can imagine that for someone unfamiliar with AC the film would be total gibberish.

Babylon A.D. (2008) - 4/10
Very uninventive and questionable story, with lots of very wild concepts and assumptions without almost any explanation or reasoning. But, Vin Diesel and the girl are pretty cool, and there was some nice cinematography here and there. Not total annoying, but overall rather poor.

Need for Speed (2014) - 4/10
No more, no less than what you'd expect from an NFS film :D But, having said that, it wasn't all bad. The lead actor and accompanying actress were both pretty enjoyable in terms of play and motivations, they were kinda relatable, which can't be said for two of the previous films I wrote about. But yeah, just another game-based flick.

Loveless (2017) - 4/10
Wow, this was disappointing. A nominee for the best foreign film, 7.7/86 ratings... Completely ununderstandable for me. I don't mind films with little-to-no action, but this was such a fucking borefest. I couldn't wait for it to finish after 30mins already, and nothing changed later on. Not only 0 action (in any sense of the word), but 0 emotions too. I can imagine that the concept behind the film was to make the audience feel what it was trying to convey (an emotionless society), but all it achieved was being annoying. There are many films that triggered me to think about the meaning of life and what is happiness and bla bla without actually trying, and this film did that to a much lesser extent, while seemingly that was its sole purpose. So quite a failure imo. Tho would be interested to hear from someone who liked it.

Also finally did a mini-marathon of the Disney-era SW films (only saw ep. VII so far, once in the cinema) (POSSIBLE SPOILERS):

Star Wars: The Force Awakens (2015) - 6/10 -> 6/10
I'm actually surprised that it's still a 6, given how many things I hate about this film. I guess the nostalgia factor gets to me too to an extent, or maybe some parts of it were actually nice. I don't want to write an essay about all the things I disliked (I could though...), so I'll stick to the main point, which is also contrasting with ep. VIII, which I'll write about in a moment: this film did not attempt to establish anything new. It's hard for me to articulate what exactly I mean. Examples though: new protagonist - a new "chosen one" that previously struggled to survive on a desert planet and also had no previous contact or knowledge of the Jedi osv. New villain - another guy in a black cape and mask, aspiring to be cool like the old villain. New villain overlord - another guy in posh clothes and with a severely damaged face, but this time he's projected BIG, because he has to give a BIGGER impression than the old villain overlord (who, by the way, was fucking iconic). New evil faction - looks pretty much the same as the old evil faction, even though the old evil faction was supposedly destroyed when its emperor was killed. It has a new name, a new general, and that's about it. New villain weapon - a bigger and sillier version of the old villain weapon. New rebel and evil ships - well, no new ships. The main supporting protagonists - the old supporting protagonists (Han osv). New formidable villain general - a cutesy redhead boi used to playing in romantic comedies (and fitting them well). About as formidable as my gf's teddy bear. LITERALLY THE WORST-CAST CHARACTER I HAVE EVER SEEN. And the story held together so poorly. It took Luke years and 3 films to achieve some level of proficiency with the force and lightsabers. But, somehow, it took Rey and Finn like an hour. Also, it turns out that stormtroopers are now trained abducted children, as opposed to clones with accelerated growth, because apparently... Well, apparently what? Literally no reason for that, other than that it was needed for the plot that somebody came up with. Because it's stupid for so many reasons that I won't even bother listing them (so here you go: even more costly, because normal rate of growth, and the empire can obviously afford literally anything because they can afford a literally planet-sized weapon, risk of genetic and other diseases and imperfections, as opposed to a perfect soldier every time, risk of a rebellion (YOU DON'T SAY)...). Oke, I'm done ranting (though I could go for much longer), hopefully you know what I mean by now. The whole film was riding purely on nostalgia that people would have from the old films, and apparently nostalgia is enough to rate a film 8/10 on average. I liked Rey though, she's a cool character.

Star Wars: The Last Jedi (2017) - 8/10
Amazingly, a complete 180 degree shift from the preceding film. This film DID try to establish something for itself, even if it did it clumsily and with universe-sized plot holes. I was very engaged throughout the film, it gave the viewer enough time to establish some emotional connection with the characters. It's these long shots on faces that the preceding film was missing. It wasn't riding on nostalgia anymore. It made some references to the old films, but that's what they were - references, rather than copied ideas. I don't even have that much to say about this film, because it simply worked well. It kept me focused on the story and on the action, not on all the film-making elements that were wrong. I was so pleased with it that I'm willing to forgive it how carelessly it toyed with the well-established lore, by introducing elements like real-time cross-universe video calls, spectral apparitions from beyond the grave making physical contact with the world, real-time cross-universe 100%-realistic body projection, someone inexperienced with the force using it to survive and transport themselves through open space, or fucking hyperspace collisions. Similar to a rebelling Stormtrooper, it seems that Disney is willing to ignore any existing lore for the sake of the story they come up with. But, as I said, this makes me more optimistic as to the direction they might be taking SW in. Though not overly optimistic.

Rogue One (2016) - 7/10
Treating it mostly like a separate spin-off, so it was reasonably enjoyable. Some enjoyable moments in the story, some idiotic ones, but overall fun film.

Solo: A Star Wars Story (2018) - 7/10
Treating it mostly like a separate spin-off, so it was reasonably enjoyable. Some enjoyable moments in the story, some idiotic ones, but overall fun film.

User avatar
John
first 35tt
Posts: 4658
Joined: 28 Sep 2002, 19:42
Team: WNO
Location: Luleå, Sweden

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by John » 25 Oct 2018, 03:03

Bohemian Rhapsody - 8/10
Very well acted and executed. Rami Malek could possibly get an Oscar nomination for this one. Slightly streamlined, made for the a wide audience, but still closer to a 9 than a 7.
Image

User avatar
Tigro
Kuski
Posts: 2143
Joined: 6 Jan 2009, 13:08
Team: Valan?
Location: Srdcom vychodniar
Contact:

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by Tigro » 31 Oct 2018, 11:24

The Wolf of Wall Street (2013) - 7/10
I mean, it is a fine movie, it was just too disturbing for me. Everyone who saw it told me - "there is very much nudity and profanity" osv. And I was like nah, it can't be that bad. Now I understand what they meant. I'd say 50 shades is nothing compared to this. Also good Scorsese and DiCaprio and Robbie and whatnot.

Stronger (2017) - 5/10
I like Gyllenhall very much and LOVE Tatiana Maslany, but this.... nah. It was a good look into a redneck's life, especially his mother was a great example, but the whole movie felt underpar.

Patriot's day (2016) - 7/10
This was better than Stronger, even though it addressed the different aspect of the same event. I know Wahlberg might seem borefest with all these real-life movies he starred in (Deepwater Horizon osv), but I like to know more about historical events and this at least magnifies them in a way I know what happened there and have some relation to it.
Image

User avatar
Zero
Kuski
Posts: 500
Joined: 19 Feb 2010, 14:16

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by Zero » 1 Nov 2018, 09:50

The Wolf of Wall Street has been confirmed to be very close to the real events. That doesn't necessarily have to make the movie any more enjoyable to watch but it's a pretty interesting aspect to understand. The movie is packed with some crazy shit lol.

I personally love the film :)
Last edited by Zero on 1 Nov 2018, 09:51, edited 1 time in total.
:bear: Image Image Image :bear:

User avatar
Zero
Kuski
Posts: 500
Joined: 19 Feb 2010, 14:16

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by Zero » 1 Nov 2018, 09:51

Guys I have been very absent from the movie scene for quite a while. Any recent titles that you'd recommend?
:bear: Image Image Image :bear:

User avatar
pawq
39mins club
Posts: 6003
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 19:56
Team: TR
Location: Southampton, UK

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by pawq » 1 Nov 2018, 10:57


User avatar
pawq
39mins club
Posts: 6003
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 19:56
Team: TR
Location: Southampton, UK

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by pawq » 9 Nov 2018, 01:53

Rewatched all HP movies in the last couple of weeks:

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (2001) - 9/10 (from 9/10)
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002) - 6/10
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004) - 8/10
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005) - 8/10
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007) - 9/10
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009) - 9/10
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 (2010) - 7/10 (from 5/10)
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 (2011) - 8/10 (from 5/10)

Haven't seen 2-6 since opened IMDb account (Nov 2010), and 7a/7b only saw in the cinema, so it's been long, too long! Very :') all the way :)

Also:

Ready Player One (2018) - 7/10
Nothing special, but fun from all the game and film references, and I really liked the message of it.

Unthinkable (2010) - 7/10
I think I've never seen such a divisive film in terms of reviews (almost all either 1-2 or 8-9). Understandably controversial. I must say it gave me a lot of food for thought, and not just about the old question "is torture morally acceptable under any circumstances", but mainly about how we might not be willing to do something that is for the greater good because it is morally unacceptable. I think most of the critics of it either don't have the emotional capacity, or the willingness, to explore this philosophical theme. Though I do agree with many other points of critique against this film, as in many ways it was a B-cat movie at best (casting beyond the 3 leading characters, dear god...). Still, "enjoyable" enough to watch (as enjoyable as a film about torture can be).

User avatar
Tigro
Kuski
Posts: 2143
Joined: 6 Jan 2009, 13:08
Team: Valan?
Location: Srdcom vychodniar
Contact:

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by Tigro » 14 Nov 2018, 22:50

Bohemian Rhapsody (2018) - 8/10
It was basically a "typical" movie about a music band. But it was done very well. The music was great so I went on and cried a bit. Rami Malek absolutely nailed his role.
Too bad they didn't go more into Freddie's (or any other band member's) personal life, all those wild parties and drug shenanigans osv. It just scratched the surface. But what they gave us was really stunning.
Recommended watch.
Image

User avatar
kuchitsu
Kuski
Posts: 1199
Joined: 13 Aug 2010, 20:31

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by kuchitsu » 29 Nov 2018, 14:59

Fantastic Beasts 2 - ugh, what is this? Very rushed story that is hard to follow, lots of characters but not a single well-developed one, a series of strange dialogues that just felt clumsy somehow (perhaps the fault of Russian translators?). I liked the first movie overall because it had a simpler plot and featured tons of cute little moments that weren't necessarily about the fate of the wizard world or something epic like that, but this one tried to do way too much and just made many mysterious characters (like Grindelwald, Nicolas Flamel, and even young Dumbledore) seem kinda lame. There were some parts that made me feel really nostalgic (man, boggart is such an amazing concept), but overall I'm quite disappointed.

User avatar
pawq
39mins club
Posts: 6003
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 19:56
Team: TR
Location: Southampton, UK

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by pawq » 30 Nov 2018, 00:11

kuchitsu wrote:
29 Nov 2018, 14:59
Fantastic Beasts 2 - ugh, what is this? Very rushed story that is hard to follow, lots of characters but not a single well-developed one, a series of strange dialogues that just felt clumsy somehow
Yeps, yeps, and yeps. One of the worst-written high-budget films I've seen, which is strange, considering it was written by Rowling. Not the fault of the Russian translators, was equally shit in English :P Gave sum 4 for some oke elements like young Dumbledore, who was really surprisingly enjoyable for me (was very worried how anyone could faithfully play young Dumbledore, but Jude Law did a great job imo). Could go on a long rant about all the things that were wrong with this film, but won't 8)

User avatar
Tigro
Kuski
Posts: 2143
Joined: 6 Jan 2009, 13:08
Team: Valan?
Location: Srdcom vychodniar
Contact:

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by Tigro » 6 Dec 2018, 23:28

Mortal Engines (2018) - 6/10
I love steampunk style. The theme was absolutely awesome.
The story - not so much. There were so many "trigger words" or phrases that I had to cringe at times. Just me hearing "kill switch" and off I go. Random Chinese girl in red - triggered. Random girl that gets like 20 minutes of screen time and does literally nothing during the whole course of the movie. Nothing. If she weren't there, you wouldn't notice.
Main hero was ok. Cliché sad story, but ok, so be it.
Overall, story-wise it was very subpar, degrading into very generic "star wars destroy the death star mission" movie, while they could explore the technology and visuals of rolling cities so much more.

But visually, this was extremely pleasing to the eye. I wasn't bored. I had fun. And that matters.
Image

User avatar
skint0r
Kuski
Posts: 742
Joined: 16 Jun 2002, 07:36
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by skint0r » 26 Dec 2018, 17:44

Kvinden i buret : 6/10
duno was it zerox who mentioned this series or epp or who knows which of these daneboys. decided to check them out and this is the first movie. it's pretty basic nordic crime/detective affair, follows pretty standard formula with characters and everything, which makes it kind of not very exciting or out of the ordinary. totally ok anyway i guess.

Joe Rogan: Strange Times : 6/10
Never been mega fan of his standup, so this was better than expected from him. just oke.

The Fault in Our Stars: 4/10
Happened to randomly read this book a few months ago, and saw they made a movie out of it. Decided to check it out to see what they made of it etc. I already didn't like the book that much, and I disliked the movie even more. It actually follows the book pretty well, and they picked a decent cast for everyone. So in the sense of being a book movie it was well done. Unfortunately the characters and story of the book is so over the top and pretentious to the point of being obnoxious, and this only gets so much worse when acted out. Angsty teens being tryhard smart and different than regular kids, le spork QUIRKY etc. very pukeworthy.

Derren Brown: Sacrifice: 6/10
Derren Brown: Pushed to the Edge: 7/10
Derren Brown: Miracle: 3/10
Saw him on JRE podcast and it had been a while since I saw anything from him, so when they talked about some of this latest special I ended up downloading them to see what they were about. A bit conflicted because it's so obviously staged, yet your brain wants to believe a bit of it, but not knowing for sure what's real or just acting (if not all of it), makes it hard to enjoy fully. Even then, it was entertaining enough, and the idea of it in itself made me keep watching, so.... I guess success enough. Miracle was lame as fuck though.

The Dawn Wall: 6/10
This was a pretty good documentary. I think I just lacked the interest in the subject enough to fully immerse brain in this. It was interesting though.

They Shall Not Grow Old: 5/10
Supercool, and also kind of boring. I was hoping the footage was somehow a bit better restored than this, even though I'm sure getting to this point was already super difficult. The voiceovers and dubbing were kind of lame. Felt like something was a bit missing from this.

The Degenerates: 4/10
A standup special series. All episodes were pretty weak with uninteresting people. The only standout episode was Joey Diaz probably.

Mission: Impossible - Fallout : 6/10
Same old stuff pretty much. Turn off brain a bit and enjoyable enough if liked the previous movies.

The Equalizer 2: 6/10
This was pretty good. Followed the same feel and whatever else from the first movie, if liked that then probably will like this too. I guess these movies are pretty much Denzel version of John Wick movies, but with a different style.

Eighth Grade: 7/10
Pretty decent. Movie makes you really feel the cringe, and it's well done.

First Man: 6/10
Felt sort of emotionless. It was enough to keep me interested and entertained, but overall it felt... hollow or something

A Quiet Place: 6/10
Really had more expectations from this. From all the hype around it, I assumed maybe it would be a "horror" movie that dared to not do the same stupid stereotypes. Nope. Stupid people doing stupid things etc. Some originality to it, and tense and exciting enough, but overrated.

BlacKkKlansman: 6/10
This was actually way way better than expected. But that probably comes from the fact that in my brain I thought this would be some kind of Will Ferrel type of humour, and that the main actor was Craig Robinson (aka Darryl from The Office). It was a bit more serious (even though very much still a comedy), and it was funny enough without going too stupid. Sort of wish could rate it a bit higher, but ultimately nothing super amazing anyway.
Prestigious member of 14.6x Tutor14 club

User avatar
Tigro
Kuski
Posts: 2143
Joined: 6 Jan 2009, 13:08
Team: Valan?
Location: Srdcom vychodniar
Contact:

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by Tigro » 26 Dec 2018, 23:58

Giving Quiet place a 6 is a blasphemy. Also, Darren Brown's Miracle really was the worst of the three. The Push was great.

I spyed:

Bird Box (2018) - 6/10
Very similar concept to the Quiet place, but better. Didn't have that stupid feel of stupid ppl doing stupid things. Not amazing, of course, but for its genre it was quite okay.
Image

User avatar
skint0r
Kuski
Posts: 742
Joined: 16 Jun 2002, 07:36
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by skint0r » 28 Dec 2018, 19:50

Annihilation: 5/10
This was very annoying, because the feeling of this had such insane potential. Very cool ideas and premise, and such a complete waste of potential. Somehow managed to make it completely boring, of course also got to add the usual annoying stupid characters doing stupid things trope (im duno why in 2018 this is still thing in movies whyyyyyyyyyy). It's almost like 6-7 movie in a way, but it could have been so much more that it's hard not to start hating it for not living up to it, and end up disliking it more than necessary. anyway. oke.

Venom: 5/10
Ultra generic superhero stuff, with some oke things added, still pretty meh.
Prestigious member of 14.6x Tutor14 club

User avatar
Tigro
Kuski
Posts: 2143
Joined: 6 Jan 2009, 13:08
Team: Valan?
Location: Srdcom vychodniar
Contact:

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by Tigro » 2 Jan 2019, 18:47

High Noon (1952) - 7/10

Old, extremely simple plot, only one song in soundtrack, but I liked. It kinda delivered the message.
Image

User avatar
skint0r
Kuski
Posts: 742
Joined: 16 Jun 2002, 07:36
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by skint0r » 26 Jan 2019, 11:16

Bird Box: 6/10
Pretty zzzz, about same level dumb as A Quiet Place to me. Just oke, mega overhyped.

Den Skyldige: 7/10
Pretty engaging, reminiscent of Locke if like such one-place talking type movies. Wasn't super amazing but just really liked it anyway.

Hunter Killer: 6/10
Very b-movie level of actors and feeling, but damn I have a little weakness for u-boat movies. Find myself liking them almost always. This was surprisingly oke. It's totally over the top unbelievable plot, with dumb action scenes that don't make much sense, but ok must admit it was pretty fun and everything somehow worked for my brain.
Prestigious member of 14.6x Tutor14 club

User avatar
Tigro
Kuski
Posts: 2143
Joined: 6 Jan 2009, 13:08
Team: Valan?
Location: Srdcom vychodniar
Contact:

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by Tigro » 26 Jan 2019, 13:55

Glass (2019) - 5/10

Wasn't cinemaing in a while, so it felt good being there agin. I expected some great stuff from Shyamalan, but imo Unbreakable > Split > Glass. The plot here seemed very arbitrary and self-purposing.
Some good stuff was there but it is far from Unbreakable for me imo.

I watched Split beforehands, didn't rate before, so it's a 6. (Unbreakable was 8 ).
Last edited by Tigro on 31 Jan 2019, 14:47, edited 1 time in total.
Image

User avatar
Tigro
Kuski
Posts: 2143
Joined: 6 Jan 2009, 13:08
Team: Valan?
Location: Srdcom vychodniar
Contact:

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by Tigro » 31 Jan 2019, 14:46

Fyre (2019) - 7/10

Nice documentary about a massive fraud. Gives you some insight into how trusting a person who seems legit and is persuasive and innovative can get you into some deep shit, because he is a highly functioning sociopath.
Image

User avatar
kuchitsu
Kuski
Posts: 1199
Joined: 13 Aug 2010, 20:31

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by kuchitsu » 7 Feb 2019, 19:04

Alita - just a mindless action movie with high quality visuals and no depth to anything. Not what you would want from an adaptation of a legendary manga, but what you would expect.

User avatar
Tigro
Kuski
Posts: 2143
Joined: 6 Jan 2009, 13:08
Team: Valan?
Location: Srdcom vychodniar
Contact:

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by Tigro » 15 Feb 2019, 00:19

Alita - Battle Angel (2019) - 7/10

I expected it to be some basic story with mindless action scenes. Well, the story was okay-ish (?) I guess. And the CGI and effects were really good imo. I liked the battles and races and all that stuff. So, not the greatest, but watchable for the visuals osv.
Image

Kazan
35mins club
Posts: 440
Joined: 10 Jan 2006, 17:12
Location: Russia, Miass

Re: IMDB votelists

Post by Kazan » 19 Feb 2019, 10:38

Alita: Battle Angel - 7/10

Post Reply