Top500 for each level. Pros and Cons

This is the only place for Elma polls on Moposite. Kuski of Month polls are also here. Read more info >>

Moderator: Moporators

Post Reply

Top500 for each level instead of top100.

Yes
58
59%
No
26
27%
Don't Care
14
14%
 
Total votes: 98

burgertime
Kuski
Posts: 41
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 22:17
Location: Cananada
Contact:

Top500 for each level. Pros and Cons

Post by burgertime » 8 Sep 2004, 18:20

I think a Top500 for each level would be great. I think that knowing your world rank in a level and seeing your direct competition makes people want to play the level more, so top500 would be nice. On the other hand there is the drive to get into the top100 which can also make people want to play a level. In my opinion, my first point outways the second.
-- burgertime --
Team burger, eating it's way to victory
TT<49 website coming... hopefully soon

User avatar
Lukazz
36mins club
Posts: 5238
Joined: 4 Jul 2004, 12:10

Post by Lukazz » 8 Sep 2004, 18:54

yeah great idea

Totti
Kuski
Posts: 103
Joined: 31 Aug 2002, 20:09

Post by Totti » 8 Sep 2004, 20:36

hell no. just hoyl a top 100 time if you want to get on moposite list oki

there are sites like vk and russian elma pages for top 25.000 for every lev

Doddddy
Kuski
Posts: 266
Joined: 13 Dec 2002, 19:59
Location: Romania
Contact:

Post by Doddddy » 8 Sep 2004, 22:10

nope, that kind of top would take long to download... and besides i'm in top100 at most of levs... :P
Reliance upon others is weakness for the strong, but strength for the weak.

User avatar
sierra
39mins club
Posts: 2469
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 22:51

Post by sierra » 8 Sep 2004, 22:57

No. When you're a total noob you shouldn't need much inspiration to improve (as it shouldn't be difficult)

Then when you become quite ok at elma it's fairly easy to reach Top100 if you enjoy playing certain levels

Then, I'm assuming, when you become a very good player Top100 seems laughable and you care more about Top20 or Top10 or something
[OMG] | TT: 39:26,06 | 27 British Records |PIT
ELMA PRO wrote:does anyone else hate sierra as much as i do? search my posts to find some of his earlier arrogance revealed, and his recent posts indicate blantant "im shit-hot" ism. if someone wants to make the ASF (anti-sierra foundation) i'll put an ugly logo in my signiture

User avatar
Juski
Kuski
Posts: 2200
Joined: 26 Dec 2003, 20:53
Location: irc://irc.ircnet.org/ranks

Post by Juski » 9 Sep 2004, 11:01

Doddddy wrote:nope, that kind of top would take long to download... and besides i'm in top100 at most of levs... :P
to long to download?? thats why u can choose between top 100 and top 300 and stuff on TT, so why cant we do that for the other to??

But i thnk it should be like top 250 or something instead of 500
No regrets Image
Are you LOST?

User avatar
sierra
39mins club
Posts: 2469
Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 22:51

Post by sierra » 9 Sep 2004, 11:14

Look, any more than 100 and you might as well just have a list of everybody in the elma community's time. Any more than 100 and it ceases to become a "records list". Any more than 100 and there is no longer any reason to be proud of seeing your name on a list.
[OMG] | TT: 39:26,06 | 27 British Records |PIT
ELMA PRO wrote:does anyone else hate sierra as much as i do? search my posts to find some of his earlier arrogance revealed, and his recent posts indicate blantant "im shit-hot" ism. if someone wants to make the ASF (anti-sierra foundation) i'll put an ugly logo in my signiture

User avatar
kinghias
Kuski
Posts: 860
Joined: 9 May 2004, 08:56
Location: Vienna

Post by kinghias » 9 Sep 2004, 12:15

i agree with sierra, top 100 is enough

User avatar
8-ball
39mins club
Posts: 4481
Joined: 9 May 2003, 13:30
Team: MiE
Location: Riga, Latvia

Post by 8-ball » 13 Sep 2004, 21:00

top100 in a level is really a goal to achieve.
so no.
maybe top300, dunno.
39:37,91

Gamefreak987
Kuski
Posts: 19
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 18:52

Post by Gamefreak987 » 22 Sep 2004, 19:41

i reckon this would be a cool idea

User avatar
Revolt
Kuski
Posts: 1100
Joined: 31 May 2003, 12:20
Location: jamming smoke on the water

Post by Revolt » 12 Jan 2005, 13:10

good goal to acheive guys :)
hi

User avatar
Boomer
39mins club
Posts: 1498
Joined: 10 Dec 2003, 16:31
Team: LOS
Location: Visby, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Boomer » 12 Jan 2005, 15:29

I'm in top 100 only at 2 levs :(

Anyway, I think 100 is enough.
Team LOS website

<jaytea> uh milk was invented in 1966
-
<teh_mila> bah, fucked up nice labpro ride cause i almost fell of the chair:)

User avatar
Dynamo
38mins club
Posts: 1982
Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 02:53
Team: HHIT
Location: The Heavens

Post by Dynamo » 12 Jan 2005, 15:57

yep...100 either that or ppl should try to get EVERYONE to input stats on stats compare...twould be tough though
Total Time: 38:35,14

User avatar
milagros
Cheatless
Posts: 4511
Joined: 19 May 2002, 17:05

Post by milagros » 12 Jan 2005, 16:40

dunno, i'm in top100 (maybe top50 or 60 now) in every level
so i relly don't need anything like that
anyway i don't check any other than top10 times
[carebox]

User avatar
8-ball
39mins club
Posts: 4481
Joined: 9 May 2003, 13:30
Team: MiE
Location: Riga, Latvia

Post by 8-ball » 12 Jan 2005, 21:27

again - no.

top1000 TT's is all that's needed.
39:37,91

User avatar
Juski
Kuski
Posts: 2200
Joined: 26 Dec 2003, 20:53
Location: irc://irc.ircnet.org/ranks

Post by Juski » 12 Jan 2005, 22:12

agree with 8 ball, times worse hthen top 100 is like boring to watch...
No regrets Image
Are you LOST?

User avatar
John
first 35tt
Posts: 4698
Joined: 28 Sep 2002, 19:42
Team: WNO
Location: Luleå, Sweden

Post by John » 12 Jan 2005, 22:58

100 is enough
Image

User avatar
Revolt
Kuski
Posts: 1100
Joined: 31 May 2003, 12:20
Location: jamming smoke on the water

Post by Revolt » 13 Jan 2005, 00:16

im in top 100 for about 35 levs i think :S need to send state again
hi

User avatar
Memphis
37mins club
Posts: 1907
Joined: 28 Feb 2003, 13:35
Location: B.C. Canada
Contact:

Post by Memphis » 13 Jan 2005, 08:37

I don't care eaither way but i agree with 8 ball top 1000 tt would be cool. atleat then you could poke fun at the country/player with the 1000th tt. hehe

User avatar
Revolt
Kuski
Posts: 1100
Joined: 31 May 2003, 12:20
Location: jamming smoke on the water

Post by Revolt » 13 Jan 2005, 15:41

1000th country :P

only like 2xx countries
hi

teajay
Donator duck
Posts: 10041
Joined: 3 Apr 2003, 17:53

Post by teajay » 13 Jan 2005, 21:09

You read like shit, rev.

User avatar
Revolt
Kuski
Posts: 1100
Joined: 31 May 2003, 12:20
Location: jamming smoke on the water

Post by Revolt » 14 Jan 2005, 02:35

Cypress wrote:could poke fun at the country/player with the 1000th tt.
country/player means you can read it either way, so you can read it as "you could poke fun at the country with the 1000th tt." :S
hi

teajay
Donator duck
Posts: 10041
Joined: 3 Apr 2003, 17:53

Post by teajay » 14 Jan 2005, 19:42

Meaning that that country has no higher tt's or either all are very low listed.

User avatar
Juski
Kuski
Posts: 2200
Joined: 26 Dec 2003, 20:53
Location: irc://irc.ircnet.org/ranks

Post by Juski » 14 Jan 2005, 21:42

Or its just someone fron finland that is lucky number 1000 on the TT list....
No regrets Image
Are you LOST?

User avatar
petsen
Meetsen
Posts: 2043
Joined: 29 May 2002, 01:27
Location: Aarhus S, Denmark or nearest DEM

Post by petsen » 30 Jan 2005, 18:44

on second thought vks sites may be good enough.. no need to trouble moposite with topxxxxx
Proud Member Of RDK

User avatar
Memphis
37mins club
Posts: 1907
Joined: 28 Feb 2003, 13:35
Location: B.C. Canada
Contact:

Post by Memphis » 30 Jan 2005, 20:26

Rev u do read like shit. haha atleast tij understood me. i mean whoever has the 1000th tt whatever player it is and whatever country it's from u could poke fun at it. like say even it it were from finland you could laugh.

teajay
Donator duck
Posts: 10041
Joined: 3 Apr 2003, 17:53

Post by teajay » 30 Jan 2005, 21:48

Yes, what I meant. I wonder how a native english speaker reads things worse than a non native one. :?

Ruvio
Kuski
Posts: 85
Joined: 1 Jan 2005, 02:16
Location: North Bay, Ontario

Post by Ruvio » 13 Feb 2005, 05:42

excellent idea!
Hockey's the best!

H8
Kuski
Posts: 295
Joined: 4 Dec 2004, 19:58
Location: Oslo, Norway

Post by H8 » 16 Feb 2005, 15:07

Great idea! At least now that stats compare seems to be down...
41:47,70

teajay
Donator duck
Posts: 10041
Joined: 3 Apr 2003, 17:53

Post by teajay » 4 Sep 2005, 15:16

I think now the time is there for a topXXXX tt.

What are the cons of having such a list?
I don't see any, except for bandwidth usage. Which seems minimal in expansion since there already is a top500 and 300 and stuff.

What are the pros of it?
I see a lot of them. Isn't it lovely to see all kuskis that have played a tt. Instead of having to search all over them under nations. It would even spare bandwidth cause you can see directly where the kuski with the tt is.
A complete list is better than just the top layer I think. Having a large tt list would even motivate beginners more to send their states.

Then also a note to abula. I sent my state in this morning (5.02 CEST) to the email: records at moposite dot com. It wasn't updated though. I had subjected the email this: Records section

Was the adress wrong? or the subject?

User avatar
John
first 35tt
Posts: 4698
Joined: 28 Sep 2002, 19:42
Team: WNO
Location: Luleå, Sweden

Post by John » 4 Sep 2005, 16:17

tijsjoris wrote:Was the adress wrong? or the subject?
Did u rename state correctly?
Btw I think top xxxx tt-list is a good idea too
Image

User avatar
Raven
Moporator
Posts: 2718
Joined: 7 Feb 2005, 15:28
Team: MiE
Location: Finland.
Contact:

Post by Raven » 4 Sep 2005, 17:52

nah not 500 :wink:
Seize the day

User avatar
Memphis
37mins club
Posts: 1907
Joined: 28 Feb 2003, 13:35
Location: B.C. Canada
Contact:

Post by Memphis » 4 Sep 2005, 18:57

I agree top xxxx tt list would be great and becides if we just have a top xxx list it sounds like a porno video.
Religious Man
|| TT: 37:47:70 || EX New Wave WR + Animal Farm WR || 24 Canadian Records || TEC Bronze Medal || HHIT in the 37min club || http://elastomaster.tripod.com/
||
Image

teajay
Donator duck
Posts: 10041
Joined: 3 Apr 2003, 17:53

Post by teajay » 4 Sep 2005, 22:57

John wrote:
tijsjoris wrote:Was the adress wrong? or the subject?
Did u rename state correctly?
Btw I think top xxxx tt-list is a good idea too
tijsjoris.dat yes.

And what does Abula think about this? I must confess I haven't searched yet for any other topics about this. But if it was negative you maybe have made up your mind already, so a line here would be appreciated.

And raven, what do you mean?

User avatar
Raven
Moporator
Posts: 2718
Joined: 7 Feb 2005, 15:28
Team: MiE
Location: Finland.
Contact:

Post by Raven » 5 Sep 2005, 13:15

tijsjoris wrote:And raven, what do you mean?
I mean that i don't want top500
Seize the day

User avatar
SveinR
Moporator
Posts: 5408
Joined: 21 May 2002, 08:05
Location: Oslo, Norway
Contact:

Post by SveinR » 5 Sep 2005, 13:18

Raven wrote: I mean that i don't want top500
That already exists though.
Was it cast for the mass who burn and toil?
Or for the vultures who thirst for blood and oil?
Rules | FAQ

teajay
Donator duck
Posts: 10041
Joined: 3 Apr 2003, 17:53

Post by teajay » 5 Sep 2005, 13:48

Oooooh, I got your point. You mean for seperate times.

Ofcourse, how couldn't we see that. :O

Post Reply