How many WRs would you have had in table 50?
Moderator: Moporators
How many WRs would you have had in table 50?
ok, this one was missing
ok would have 50, missing loop and steep by 0.01, precarious by 0.29 and framework by 0.30
ok would have 50, missing loop and steep by 0.01, precarious by 0.29 and framework by 0.30
[carebox]
wow leeland nice work
Religious Man
|| TT: 37:47:70 || EX New Wave WR + Animal Farm WR || 24 Canadian Records || TEC Bronze Medal || HHIT in the 37min club || http://elastomaster.tripod.com/ ||
|| TT: 37:47:70 || EX New Wave WR + Animal Farm WR || 24 Canadian Records || TEC Bronze Medal || HHIT in the 37min club || http://elastomaster.tripod.com/ ||
12 missing: Long Haul, The Steppes, Spiral, Precarious, Headbanger, Animal Farm, Steep Corner, Zig-Zag, Framework, He He, Bowling, Hooked
TT: 37:03:04 || 22 Polish Records || 54 WC || Team [EF]
46
missing:
Long Haul, Precarious, Headbanger, Animal Farm, Steep Corner, Framework, He He and Bowling
missing:
Long Haul, Precarious, Headbanger, Animal Farm, Steep Corner, Framework, He He and Bowling
TT: 37:03:04 || 22 Polish Records || 54 WC || Team [EF]
51
Missing:
Long Haul, Precarious, Framework
Missing:
Long Haul, Precarious, Framework
TT: 37:03:04 || 22 Polish Records || 54 WC || Team [EF]
- Morgan
- 36mins club
- Posts: 582
- Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 22:55
- Team: SPEED
- Location: Lębork, Poland
- Contact:
Re: How many WRs would you have had in table 50?
38 nowMorgan wrote:20
Re: How many WRs would you have had in table 50?
54 WRs
TT: 37:03:04 || 22 Polish Records || 54 WC || Team [EF]
Re: How many WRs would you have had in table 50?
Kowal: You wont update that. n00b!
Re: How many WRs would you have had in table 50?
daaaaaaaame im nab :D
still, najs o/
still, najs o/
John: lol hittade ett popcorn i naveln
(19:52:06) (@Madnezz) The Golden Apple Award goes to.....
(19:52:36) (@Madnezz) ib9814.lev by igge!!!
(19:52:06) (@Madnezz) The Golden Apple Award goes to.....
(19:52:36) (@Madnezz) ib9814.lev by igge!!!
Zweq wrote:99.9999% of nabs haven't even opened the book yet and most of those that have are still on the first pages
Re: How many WRs would you have had in table 50?
yeah, gratz Lukazz
TT: 37:03:04 || 22 Polish Records || 54 WC || Team [EF]
Re: How many WRs would you have had in table 50?
3 \o/
uphill, tag & circ
uphill, tag & circ
Team TR
Multi WR in Labyrinth with GRob
Best Internal Total Times, Pipe stats & Pipe archive
World kuski map, World Cup stats
- Grace
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4848
- Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
- Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.
Re: How many WRs would you have had in table 50?
13 >.<
Cyberscore!
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
- Morgan
- 36mins club
- Posts: 582
- Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 22:55
- Team: SPEED
- Location: Lębork, Poland
- Contact:
Re: How many WRs would you have had in table 50?
50 wrs:
missing 32, 34, 41, 45
missing 32, 34, 41, 45
- Grace
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4848
- Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
- Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.
Re: How many WRs would you have had in table 50?
18Haruhi wrote:13 >.<
Cyberscore!
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
- Grace
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4848
- Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
- Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.
Re: How many WRs would you have had in table 50?
I have 39 now o,o
Cyberscore!
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
___________________________________________________
Targets: 6 Legendary, 23 WC, 20 Pro, 5 Good | AvgTT: 39:59:96
- Morgan
- 36mins club
- Posts: 582
- Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 22:55
- Team: SPEED
- Location: Lębork, Poland
- Contact:
Re: How many WRs would you have had in table 50?
53, missing sink(