everything is true except the last sentence8-ball wrote:bullshit
Vsync internal level list
Moderator: Moporators
11. Gravity ride - ON - this level needs no special tricks so why off, I made 23,90 when had no idea about vsync(default is on), Off is maybe easier way to get time, but this is the kind of level where vsync off is just unnecessary luxus
44. Freefall - ON - yes, why not, same case as gravity ride, my 11,63 was made when all I played was ON, You don't need any lucky grip here, all you have to do is hoyling, of course OFF can be easier here, but now with off I cant even do the start now.
44. Freefall - ON - yes, why not, same case as gravity ride, my 11,63 was made when all I played was ON, You don't need any lucky grip here, all you have to do is hoyling, of course OFF can be easier here, but now with off I cant even do the start now.
TT: 38:36,51 || team SPEED || Islands WR
I agree, i heared about vsync at the second event of Mastercup 2 - so i did my lab pro bounce with on too! My time sucks, but the bounce was good XDKopaka wrote:Indeed, I did my lp bounces with on too. Not that I can't turn it off, just find it easier with on, or think I find it easier .tijsjoris wrote:Labyrinth pro bounce is very doable with on.
Lukazz once told me that he drives lab pro and enigma with on, cuz he too thinks it s easier
mfg Palme
the list is pretty simple, but it's all about fps how elma works apparently and having vsync on and adjust refresh rate is one way to change playability. For example I can adjust fps to 60 70 72 75 85 100 120 140 144 and the cruel truth is that 70, 72 or 75 give chances for sink wr when any other fps it goes nxt to impossible get under 32.80. Then again I don't have much clue are there other factors and also is there a program to 'force' play elma with certain fps, dunno if that would be 'lame' but...yea that's what this shit has gone to
I don't understand why don't someone skilled just make a simple prog to limit fps to certain value. That way all the vsync shit could be forgotten. Maybe there is one already?Zweq wrote:is there a program to 'force' play elma with certain fps, dunno if that would be 'lame' but...yea that's what this shit has gone to
Though it would be a problem for those who cannot change vsync off, because that would be a requirement. If vsync is on, there is no way to get above the limitation of monitor refresh rate, to my knowledge.
Btw I am one of those who cannot change it off, at least I don't know a way to do that under linux.
- Grace
- 38mins club
- Posts: 4861
- Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 10:45
- Location: Deep in your Imagination, Twirling your Dreams and Weaving your thoughts.
i dunno how to so i do vsync on all the time aswell.
Cyberscore!
___________________________________________________
Targets: 8 Legendary, 26 WC, 18 Pro, 2 Good | AvgTT: 39:20:99
___________________________________________________
Targets: 8 Legendary, 26 WC, 18 Pro, 2 Good | AvgTT: 39:20:99
- Juski
- Kuski
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: 26 Dec 2003, 20:53
- Location: irc://irc.ircnet.org/ranks
the problem with that dz is that you can set the fps to high and make it lagg and get some secs cut off your time or something?
No regrets
Are you LOST?
Are you LOST?
since vsync has so much to do with how the bike acts, the reason must be the physics calculation and how often it's done. with vsync off (fps is higher) elma makes more calculations per second so when you're doing bounce, there's much more wicked calculations going on so the outcome might be better, bigger or more insane bounce. possibly.
one reason i could think of for better grip when vsync off, is rounding errors. when your wheel is about to come off ground, the position of wheel gets rounded so close to ground that it's still actually locked to it (the more calculations per second, the less difference in the result). compared to vsync on, the wheel has more time to get further from the ground between every frame's calculations and so the grip decreases. i guess milagros could do more precise investigation how all this happens inside elma, but at least it would seem logical.
with vsync off you get something like 200-400 fps, and when you switch timer off you can get ~double, in case one would need teh. map doesn't affect much. of course that doesn't work with vsync on.
for mcup2's second event i first needed to have low fps for the apple and then high fps to get wheel through the annoying "vsync-hole", so i set vsync off and made my music software to generate some cpu-heavy sounds silently to get ~100fps with timer on. when i got to the vsync-hole, i switched timer off to get double and the wheel went straight through without any problems. ez tuning?
one reason i could think of for better grip when vsync off, is rounding errors. when your wheel is about to come off ground, the position of wheel gets rounded so close to ground that it's still actually locked to it (the more calculations per second, the less difference in the result). compared to vsync on, the wheel has more time to get further from the ground between every frame's calculations and so the grip decreases. i guess milagros could do more precise investigation how all this happens inside elma, but at least it would seem logical.
with vsync off you get something like 200-400 fps, and when you switch timer off you can get ~double, in case one would need teh. map doesn't affect much. of course that doesn't work with vsync on.
for mcup2's second event i first needed to have low fps for the apple and then high fps to get wheel through the annoying "vsync-hole", so i set vsync off and made my music software to generate some cpu-heavy sounds silently to get ~100fps with timer on. when i got to the vsync-hole, i switched timer off to get double and the wheel went straight through without any problems. ez tuning?
nice post veetseta and there's nothing new using winamp or such to get cpu usage up and lower fps, I used that in shelf life 3-4 years ago. Nowadays that's impossible though with too powerful cpus, like I'm having almost 900 fps vsync off, timer on, 1800 timer off (mila said elma is limited to 30-999 fps though).
One crazy tune level is uphill battle where I think the best brutals are found between 150-300 fps, unfortunately it's impossible to test it without some fps limiter prog, can only test couple of fps values between 60-144 thanks to vsync on, but that's it, then the next step is 800 fps with vsync off :(. And 800 fps sucks ass on uphill battle brutal, 144 felt a lot closer, but braked too much. So I'm guessing overloading cpu to get 200ish fps(aka computer from 90s) would give nice n juicy 19.xx uphill battle times.
what's your fps jarkko? ;)
One crazy tune level is uphill battle where I think the best brutals are found between 150-300 fps, unfortunately it's impossible to test it without some fps limiter prog, can only test couple of fps values between 60-144 thanks to vsync on, but that's it, then the next step is 800 fps with vsync off :(. And 800 fps sucks ass on uphill battle brutal, 144 felt a lot closer, but braked too much. So I'm guessing overloading cpu to get 200ish fps(aka computer from 90s) would give nice n juicy 19.xx uphill battle times.
what's your fps jarkko? ;)
I don't know, but I got that 19:98 time on my computer, which is AMD XP 2000+ and GF6600GT, pretty old already. 150Hz and VSYNC off. But nowadays I can't do that good bounces anymore, maybe it's some driver thing, graphics card driver.Zweq wrote:what's your fps jarkko?
That 19:96 I got with my sisters computer, which has AMD Sempron 3200+, some cheap graphics card and LCD monitor with 60Hz and VSYNC off, of course. So, maybe this has better fps, I don't know.
EDIT: Okay, I checked with fraps and there sure is difference. I have 240-250 fps and my sister has over 1200 fps.
Last edited by Jarkko on 12 Feb 2007, 14:07, edited 2 times in total.
TT: 43
it's 30-1000Zweq wrote:(mila said elma is limited to 30-999 fps though)
if it runs slower (less than 30fps), elma counts it in more steps like it was 30fps
1000fps is max due to the timer that has 1ms resolution and if the difference between last 2 frames is 0, then frame counting is skipped
[carebox]
interesting, I just suck thenJarkko wrote:I don't know, but I got that 19:98 time on my computer, which is AMD XP 2000+ and GF6600GT, pretty old already. 150Hz and VSYNC off. But nowadays I can't do that good bounces anymore, maybe it's some driver thing, graphics card driver.Zweq wrote:what's your fps jarkko? ;)
That 19:96 I got with my sisters computer, which has AMD Sempron 3200+, some cheap graphics card and LCD monitor with 60Hz and VSYNC off, of course. So, maybe this has better fps, I don't know.
EDIT: Okay, I checked with fraps and there sure is difference. I have 240-250 fps and my sister has over 1200 fps.
weird. My really old 20,5x i got with an extremely low fps. Some geforce 5200 MX or smth i had + Athlon XP 2100+ (i lowered CPU speed to 1500+, so it is about ~1300 MHz cuz it burnt the thing that i dunno how is called in english EIGHT TIMES in a week. Yes, that's Russian electricity in small towns). Don't think my comment is useless, cuz i had a really good brutal that time. At least i wasn't loosing to John's 20:13 (if my memory doesnt fail me) rec 'till the very end. So my fps was something like 110-150.
I've just bought a new laptop.. and I did some tests on elma.
As for saving power, it's possible to adjust surten things, like cpu speed, air cooling, light and other stuff.
I tested all 6 different 'cpu speeds' and checked the fps.
Specs:
1 GB DDR II SDRAM
Intel Core 2 Duo 2 GHz
Video memory: 256 MB DDR SDRAM (guess this is the ATI card)
ATI MOBILITY RADEON X1600 med op til (with up to) 512 MB HyperMemory / PCI Express x16 / 2048 x 1536 / 32-bit farve
I've got 0 idea off which levels are good with X amount of fps. Maybe someone could make a list?
And maybe some day someone will make a fps forcer prog suitable for elma =P
As for saving power, it's possible to adjust surten things, like cpu speed, air cooling, light and other stuff.
I tested all 6 different 'cpu speeds' and checked the fps.
Specs:
1 GB DDR II SDRAM
Intel Core 2 Duo 2 GHz
Video memory: 256 MB DDR SDRAM (guess this is the ATI card)
ATI MOBILITY RADEON X1600 med op til (with up to) 512 MB HyperMemory / PCI Express x16 / 2048 x 1536 / 32-bit farve
I've got 0 idea off which levels are good with X amount of fps. Maybe someone could make a list?
And maybe some day someone will make a fps forcer prog suitable for elma =P
Code: Select all
CPU Speed Something
Behandlings Hastighed (Normal profile)
Elma
Resolution: 800x600
Zoom : 1.60
Center Cam: On
Timer : Off
Vsync : Off
Without Power Cable
Niveau FPS
6 305-309
5 299-305
4 293-297
3 282-287
2 183-187
1 123-125
With Power Cable
Niveau FPS
6 999
5 999
4 915-960
3 750-785
2 480-490
1 300-310
------------------
Cpu Speed Something
Behandlings Hastighed (Normal Profile)
Elma
Resolution: 800x600
Zoom : 1.60
Center Cam: On
Timer : Off
Vsync : On
With cable
Niveau FPS
6 60-61
5 60-61
4 60-61
3 60-61
2 60-61
1 60-61
Thorze wrote:I just wanted to make a cool topic like Juish have cool topics..
- Kopaka
- 39mins club
- Posts: 6612
- Joined: 23 May 2002, 13:59
- Team: LAME
- Location: In a northern danish city beating YOUR record.
- Contact:
That ati catalyst center has different gfx options, including vsync, so I guess you have vsync turned off in catalyst center, and when you close it, it goes back to normal.
I use that catalyst center aswell for vsync, in the version I have, I can make profiles and then desktop shortcuts or key shortcuts for those profiles. So it's pretty easy to turn on and off. :)
I use that catalyst center aswell for vsync, in the version I have, I can make profiles and then desktop shortcuts or key shortcuts for those profiles. So it's pretty easy to turn on and off. :)