New WRs

Jarkko · Post by **Jarkko** » 10 Nov 2008, 00:13

^I know it's not the same, but couldn't wait any longer. Well, I try better it to next table and you can guess the time then

nick-o-matic · Post by **nick-o-matic** » 10 Nov 2008, 00:23

Hehe thanks, some another level than Hooked would bring more surprise momentum too ;P

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 10 Nov 2008, 00:24

sik jarkko :0

Cap · Post by **Cap** » 10 Nov 2008, 00:33

Morgan · Post by **Morgan** » 10 Nov 2008, 00:34

grats jarkko, poor t0r

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 10 Nov 2008, 00:50

i bet t0r has been doing some secret hoyling. ez by new years eve he'll send all his times 8)

Xiphias · Post by **Xiphias** » 10 Nov 2008, 00:51

Igge wrote:i bet t0r has been doing some secret hoyling. ez by new years eve he'll send all his times

how much do you want to bet?

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 10 Nov 2008, 01:05

Xiphias · Post by **Xiphias** » 10 Nov 2008, 01:36

Igge wrote:$1

deal

Grace · Post by **Grace** » 10 Nov 2008, 07:35

i already gzed you earlier this wek when i found out (BEFORE ANYONE ELSE, PWNED MOTHERFUCKERS)

but gz anyway Jarkko, your a najs hoyla.

dorTrus · Post by **dorTrus** » 10 Nov 2008, 08:11

Jarkko, what cn you say about 16:xx` possibility?

Coc0k · Post by **Coc0k** » 10 Nov 2008, 08:18

Jarkko wrote:Maybe px didn't get my email but anyway

Hooked: 17.13

maybe you didnt send your letter? or maybe you didnt do wr?

klisse · Post by **klisse** » 10 Nov 2008, 08:39

Jarkko wrote:Maybe px didn't get my email but anyway

Hooked: 17.13

You know bug apple isn't allowed?

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 10 Nov 2008, 09:54

haha klisse

Jarkko · Post by **Jarkko** » 10 Nov 2008, 13:08

dorTrus wrote:Jarkko, what cn you say about 16:xx` possibility?

At least some low 17.0x is possible and why not 16.99. I have already missed many 17.0x runs and one even very low .0x but screwed the timing in the end hangs and it ended up another .13.

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 10 Nov 2008, 13:35

dont hoyl more plz :S

Xiphias · Post by **Xiphias** » 10 Nov 2008, 13:36

sorry for offtopicness but that avater zweq

P just noticed what it is

jaytea · Post by **jaytea** » 10 Nov 2008, 13:58

hah zweq already has hooked

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 10 Nov 2008, 15:02

uh, nice

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 11 Nov 2008, 14:50

nice Jarkko

i knew someone will beat this WR soon, and why nat one of the biggest hoylas?

body25 · Post by **body25** » 22 Nov 2008, 01:18

Which WR(s) are said to be most unbeatable?
Warm Up 14.00?

Labs · Post by **Labs** » 22 Nov 2008, 01:41

Stini's bug bounce enigma

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 22 Nov 2008, 01:52

ez better first part than stini = ez beatable

Bismuth · Post by **Bismuth** » 22 Nov 2008, 02:53

ez WR using the style you showed me, Igge

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 22 Nov 2008, 16:09

Igge wrote:ez better first part than stini = ez beatable

yes, you can save some time (maybe 0.1 even 0.2 sec?) from the start to the bounce, but must do perfect no-bug bounce, to remove that bug from the table (no offence stini

)

Mawane · Post by **Mawane** » 22 Nov 2008, 16:13

ez 18 then! imagine 18,xx on table!

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 22 Nov 2008, 18:35

no, not ez 18. but possible 18 of course

Grace · Post by **Grace** » 23 Nov 2008, 01:45

CuLiNo wrote:
Igge wrote:ez better first part than stini = ez beatable
yes, you can save some time (maybe 0.1 even 0.2 sec?) from the start to the bounce, but must do perfect no-bug bounce, to remove that bug from the table (no offence stini )

i know a style that i did a run 0.2 faster than stini by 8 seconds, but it's so inconsistent and hard to get a good run that max impsy.

body25 · Post by **body25** » 26 Nov 2008, 15:49

What exactly does
"i know a style that i did a run 0.2 faster than stini by 8 seconds, but it's so inconsistent and hard to get a good run that max impsy."
mean?

FinMan · Post by **FinMan** » 26 Nov 2008, 16:37

It means that Stinis run is like impossible beat. Reason: Buggish bounce.

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 26 Nov 2008, 17:35

body25 wrote:What exactly does
"i know a style that i did a run 0.2 faster than stini by 8 seconds, but it's so inconsistent and hard to get a good run that max impsy."
mean?

means that 8 seconds into his rec hes in the lead by .2 seconds when comparing to stini's rec. however getting that .2 seconds lead is very hard, and after that part comes the bounce, which is even harder, hence he thinks that getting that lead and also making a nice finish is so hard it's almost impossible

Memphis · Post by **Memphis** » 26 Nov 2008, 18:13

there some new start style to enigma that only I havn't heard off? Or is Stini's run off the start not very good? But ya I fully agree, it's going to be tough to beat that bounce on the end.

body25 · Post by **body25** » 26 Nov 2008, 22:30

Igge wrote: means that 8 seconds into his rec hes in the lead by .2 seconds when comparing to stini's rec. however getting that .2 seconds lead is very hard, and after that part comes the bounce, which is even harder, hence he thinks that getting that lead and also making a nice finish is so hard it's almost impossible

Aight, ty.

If thereÂ´s a new style could someone share it? Guess it has been tried a million times (hoyling

) but isnt there a FFKKNNNN way to get down to teh apple w/out going up that slope? I mean shortcutting it a bit...Just cant do it and its taking the piss...FKN shitgame

teajay · Post by **teajay** » 26 Nov 2008, 23:22

yes there is a way. look above the killers, fall down from there. or do sick stoppie before first killer and fall inbetween them, I did that when I was a nab.

body25 · Post by **body25** » 26 Nov 2008, 23:58

tijsjoris wrote:yes there is a way. look above the killers, fall down from there. or do sick stoppie before first killer and fall inbetween them, I did that when I was a nab.

I might be stupid but dont really get it. Could you, or anyone, share a rec?

The_BoneLESS · Post by **The_BoneLESS** » 27 Nov 2008, 01:14

body25 wrote:
tijsjoris wrote:yes there is a way. look above the killers, fall down from there. or do sick stoppie before first killer and fall inbetween them, I did that when I was a nab.
I might be stupid but dont really get it. Could you, or anyone, share a rec?

Easiest style i know, drove 46 on second try.

body25 · Post by **body25** » 27 Nov 2008, 01:23

The_BoneLESS wrote:
body25 wrote:
tijsjoris wrote:yes there is a way. look above the killers, fall down from there. or do sick stoppie before first killer and fall inbetween them, I did that when I was a nab.
I might be stupid but dont really get it. Could you, or anyone, share a rec?
Easiest style i know, drove 46 on second try.

Ty. Weird i just did something. Could this + bugbump improve WR ?
Maybe a bit OT, sorry if so.

Igge · Post by **Igge** » 27 Nov 2008, 01:39

ahahahahahahhaah

hahhahahahhahhah
ahhaahahahah
hahaah
ah
ahahahahhaahahhaah

no.

body25 · Post by **body25** » 27 Nov 2008, 02:30

Igge wrote:ahahahahahahhaah

hahhahahahhahhah
ahhaahahahah
hahaah
ah
ahahahahhaahahhaah

no.

LOL, no pain no gain

A little less drunk start and a smooooth bumpy finish....then
body25 on da list...

Bismuth · Post by **Bismuth** » 27 Nov 2008, 04:55

Is the bugbounce pure luck or is it quite possible to do?

Mawane · Post by **Mawane** » 27 Nov 2008, 06:03

stini is bornt for this

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 27 Nov 2008, 08:43

for most people it is pure luck but stini has nice tuning i guess...

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 27 Nov 2008, 08:51

it is true that stini had (has?) a comp where bugs occurred abnormally often ;:D he had hundreds of bugs in pipe, while i get a bug twice a year

Lukazz · Post by **Lukazz** » 27 Nov 2008, 10:54

ye, i had maybe 2-3 bug bounces in my elma carreer. o_O

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 27 Nov 2008, 17:32

Memphis wrote:there some new start style to enigma that only I havn't heard off? Or is Stini's run off the start not very good? But ya I fully agree, it's going to be tough to beat that bounce on the end.

tried some different start, maybe faster?

http://up.k10x.net/rsmtdzhbigzmd/47x.rec

Johann · Post by **Johann** » 27 Nov 2008, 22:23

Not faster..

body25 · Post by **body25** » 28 Nov 2008, 05:17

Sla · Post by **Sla** » 28 Nov 2008, 16:17

fuck you with your posts body 25 arghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

culinko · Post by **culinko** » 28 Nov 2008, 16:27

Johann wrote:Not faster..

i tried it 2 mins, so it could be

Grace · Post by **Grace** » 28 Nov 2008, 23:38

johann, thats kind of the style i was talking about, and you can somehow get push off the second poly to speed you up (can't remember exactly how right now) to get some 0.1-0.2

it's faster if you do it right, but usually slower in the air after second poly.