New WRs

Memphis · Post by **Memphis** » 23 Jul 2010, 00:18

haha ur right, it won't ever be beaten. Must have just shut ur eyes before the flower and was presently surprised to see a wr. Sick times though guys. Bjorn I can't believe u have 4 wrs already. Just slowly picking away at them. Nice improvements to both u and zweq. Just dominated those levels.

Honza · Post by **Honza** » 23 Jul 2010, 06:05

siack wrz, graTits

Bjenn · Post by **Bjenn** » 23 Jul 2010, 09:47

Thanks all.
It wasnt that hard wr to beat, as John said it was not a very good wr. In fact it took me only 2 days whereas the first day I hoyled I was only 0.01 from wr time =)
This is the only time better than Johns i got, pretty much quitted hoyling after got teh.

Memphis · Post by **Memphis** » 23 Jul 2010, 16:18

think you could shave off more time or is it a pretty smooth ride?

Madness · Post by **Madness** » 23 Jul 2010, 19:53

lal gratz all pro mans and bjoern =D

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 23 Jul 2010, 20:35

bjoern no pro mans?

:D

Bismuth · Post by **Bismuth** » 23 Jul 2010, 22:41

sneaky way to raise your post count madness?

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 23 Jul 2010, 22:54

"delete" posts were 500th and 501st xddd nice jubilee mad

:D

Bismuth · Post by **Bismuth** » 24 Jul 2010, 01:50

what surprised me is that they actually got deleted

oh and I know how far we are from the topic now

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 24 Jul 2010, 20:17

shitty times

Bjenn · Post by **Bjenn** » 24 Jul 2010, 20:43

Memphis wrote:think you could shave off more time or is it a pretty smooth ride?

Could shave off more i think. Not that smooth ride, was good end though i guess.

_FreaK_ · Post by **_FreaK_** » 25 Jul 2010, 03:24

heh

sure congratz all

especially John with such lucky time on labby pro which WR he was holding for so long before =]

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 25 Jul 2010, 06:45

ye imo John proved that he's a real lab pro king xd like jarkko is a king of uphill, zweq of turnaround, kazan of DT etc :>

Bjenn · Post by **Bjenn** » 25 Jul 2010, 14:46

Kinda ironically since Kazan improved 0.01 on Johns ramp and now he revenges by 0.01 on Lab pro =D

_FreaK_ · Post by **_FreaK_** » 26 Jul 2010, 06:58

looks more like a revenge to zweq's quick round for me =]]]

FinMan · Post by **FinMan** » 26 Jul 2010, 08:59

Yes, Zweq steals John's wr by mistake, John revenges to Kazan?

Bjenn · Post by **Bjenn** » 26 Jul 2010, 10:07

But Kazan had wr on lab pro last table, so technically he beats him, not Zweq.

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 26 Jul 2010, 14:12

so

Björn wrote:Kinda ironically since Kazan improved 0.01 on Johns ramp and now he revenges by 0.01 on Lab pro =D

gimp · Post by **gimp** » 26 Jul 2010, 15:12

Everyone and their mother is getting good times on hangman it seems, wr should be there next table i think.

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 2 Aug 2010, 17:49

in multi 8 wrs have been beaten already in eol o,o
serpents, preca, shelf, bounce back, zigzag, fruit, downhill, trix and hang tight.
mila ye

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 2 Aug 2010, 18:00

and tricks

Ramone · Post by **Ramone** » 2 Aug 2010, 20:17

and upside

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 2 Aug 2010, 20:27

nat hang tight, but also tag been beaten ages ago and apparently twin peaks?

Mawane · Post by **Mawane** » 3 Aug 2010, 02:27

The Official Multi WR Table
#143
Last updated July 21st 2010

????? so you overwrote table 143 i guess

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 6 Aug 2010, 10:02

little update

01, 03, 04, 08, 12, 15, 16, 20, 25, 27, 28, 31, 33, 36, 39, 43, 48, 51, 52, 54

thats 20 new multi wrs if everybody sends times. also there have been some wrs that never get to table such as 19,41 oau by zaraptor & talli, 15,44 preca by jaytea & jamppa and 20,27 trix by me and juz

i dont remember what times ppl made to hehe, some 41.mid probably. me and juz got 37 apple h

not sure what the 11.46 hang tight is about though, if it's not bug it's max pro wr

also theres new style in new wave that will make 21 combined tt much easier, who will be the first person?

Kortsu · Post by **Kortsu** » 6 Aug 2010, 11:42

That's all fine and dandy, but where's Jarkko & Jarkko with under 20 sec Uphill Battle?

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 6 Aug 2010, 12:07

there was also hooked multi wr by kd & orcc in the testing version

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 6 Aug 2010, 13:12

Kortsu wrote:That's all fine and dandy, but where's Jarkko & Jarkko with under 20 sec Uphill Battle?

hes waiting someone to beat his old multi wr just so he can humiliate taking it back with first try

trew · Post by **trew** » 6 Aug 2010, 13:22

imo levs like 05, 10, 14, 29, 34 and 45 should be excluded from multi table. pointless levs to multi.

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 6 Aug 2010, 13:27

loop multi is faster than single, only needs too pros to do teh.. still hard because they would be over each other doing first 17s teh same
for sink it is really hard to say, if there is some faster mid bounce that avoids apple
multi levs with no apples are nab, i have to agree
or single lev wr holders should be automatically holding multi wr if it's better

Ramone · Post by **Ramone** » 6 Aug 2010, 13:41

where to find kinda up to date multirecs?

I wanna check out some of current styles so can spot what level to try... have no idea at all atm. Cant be arsed to try all 54 levels for possible styles...

Jarkko · Post by **Jarkko** » 6 Aug 2010, 15:01

Kortsu wrote:That's all fine and dandy, but where's Jarkko & Jarkko with under 20 sec Uphill Battle?

I have done 19.99 already ages ago just for a fun. And I have to agree that levs like 02 and 05 are quite pointless and should be same as single wr or don't include them at all.

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 6 Aug 2010, 15:35

milagros wrote:single lev wr holders should be automatically holding multi wr if it's better

like even for levs like ramp now..

trew · Post by **trew** » 6 Aug 2010, 16:58

milagros wrote:or single lev wr holders should be automatically holding multi wr if it's better

+1

FinMan · Post by **FinMan** » 6 Aug 2010, 19:08

Code: Select all

The following are the combined total times for individual players. For each
level the best time is choosen of either the player's single player best
time, or the best multiplayer time where the player was one of the two
players.
If a player doesn't have such a time for a level, this will add ten
minutes to the total time.

This is told in stats.txt. Basically multi wrs should work in same way?

e: ty zamppe.

Orcc · Post by **Orcc** » 6 Aug 2010, 21:16

milagros wrote: loop multi is faster than single, only needs too pros to do teh.. still hard because they would be over each other doing first 17s teh same

Here's multi LGR that hides the other bike. (I know it sucks that you need to swap bike to that ugly yellow one, but I didn't make this lgr.)

http://up.k10x.net/kezqgavzodrfu/multi.lgr

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 16 Aug 2010, 14:05

FinMan wrote:

Code: Select all

The following are the combined total times for individual players. For each
level the best time is choosen of either the player's single player best
time, or the best multiplayer time where the player was one of the two
players.
If a player doesn't have such a time for a level, this will add ten
minutes to the total time.

This is told in stats.txt. Basically multi wrs should work in same way?

e: ty zamppe.

yes, it should only theoretically it is possible to do a level which can be finished in single but cant be in multi (teh competition who does it first was won by jalli and he got the eol account long time ago), similarily levels where singles can be done faster can be done too
..btw if i didnt miss any, there are 33 new multi wrs :
01, 03, 04, 05, 07, 08, 10, 12, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 39, 40, 43, 48, 51, 52, 53, 54

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 18 Aug 2010, 00:07

03, 06, 10 and 22 not sent:/

Xiphias · Post by **Xiphias** » 18 Aug 2010, 00:21

Talli and I forgot one too :/

Zweq · Post by **Zweq** » 18 Aug 2010, 07:19

ye animal farm nat newest? and i forgot steppes of course =/ ez 5 new multi wrs already =D

trew · Post by **trew** » 18 Aug 2010, 11:12

multi wr tt dropped 16 seconds, and obv it's not all new wrs yet.

eol really helped getting this table going...

wjelo · Post by **wjelo** » 18 Aug 2010, 14:33

milagros wrote:03, 06, 10 and 22 not sent:/

I don't see WR on 06 on EOL page

BTW there is a topic about multi WRs, I think it is better to have 2 separate discussions.

Madness · Post by **Madness** » 18 Aug 2010, 14:56

Where's my slalom ?!

milagros · Post by **milagros** » 19 Aug 2010, 10:58

i meant 05, not 06

Chris · Post by **Chris** » 19 Aug 2010, 17:57

Toringe is nearly wiped, now from multi WR table.

jblaze · Post by **jblaze** » 25 Aug 2010, 12:07

MozMan wrote:
Abula wrote:No, but:

#90 - 49,74 Jeppe
#91 - 49,50 Jokke
#92 - 49,49 Jeppe
#93 - 49,20 Jokke
#94 - 49,19 Jeppe
LMFAO, for some reason i find that so funny, Abula, thats so true!!! typical jeppe hoyling, no new styles

http://elmaonline.moposite.com/?s=stats&p=internal&i=30
hahaha
anyway, gratz for new wr o,o

pawq · Post by **pawq** » 25 Aug 2010, 15:34

this is lol
http://elmaonline.moposite.com/?s=stats ... pe=overall

jblaze · Post by **jblaze** » 25 Aug 2010, 15:45

http://elmaonline.moposite.com/?s=stats ... erall&i=44
max hoyla

gimp · Post by **gimp** » 29 Aug 2010, 21:48

Tunnel Terror!

and Jeppe is now on the table

_FreaK_ · Post by **_FreaK_** » 29 Aug 2010, 22:07

HOW THE ..... sick time in tunnel zweq..
and congratulations for Jeppe... thou i hate him for taking my country's only wr =] ... i really hope TM takes that one back or someone makes the sc finally.