Yes that's the only thing wrong with this message.dymnindible wrote:P.S. Excuse me for choosing "General" to leave a message for men about xanax versus alprazolam
online alprazolam pharmacy 86
Moderator: Moporators
- Kopaka
- 39mins club
- Posts: 6611
- Joined: 23 May 2002, 13:59
- Team: LAME
- Location: In a northern danish city beating YOUR record.
- Contact:
Re: online alprazolam pharmacy 86
- analcactus
- Kuski
- Posts: 421
- Joined: 7 Dec 2010, 12:54
- Location: St. Petersburg, Russia
- Contact:
Re: online alprazolam pharmacy 86
maybe someone disallow users with less than 10 messages to create topics?
Re: online alprazolam pharmacy 86
I don't see these topics as a major problem at the moment, they are easily ignored.
Re: online alprazolam pharmacy 86
Easily ignored, true, but wouldn't it be better if they weren't appearing? And is the user-acceptance by admins still in force? I think it was beneficial, don't remember any further discussions about it though (like deciding why to remove it before doing so)
Team TR
Multi WR in Labyrinth with GRob
Best Internal Total Times, Pipe stats & Pipe archive
World kuski map, World Cup stats
Re: online alprazolam pharmacy 86
User activation by admin was only in effect a short amount because of the massive spambot assault before the board software got updated. It's nice to avoid such extra hassles, both for the admins and the new users.
What is possible, however, is to make the admins having to approve each post a user makes until he reaches, say, 3 posts. It's still a bit of an extra hassle though, and as Orcc says, spambots aren't such a big problem right now.
What is possible, however, is to make the admins having to approve each post a user makes until he reaches, say, 3 posts. It's still a bit of an extra hassle though, and as Orcc says, spambots aren't such a big problem right now.
Re: online alprazolam pharmacy 86
but what if we really need alprazolam 86 or whatever?