Look for replays and levels and ask people's times.
Moderator: Moporators
Lukazz
36mins club
Posts: 5241 Joined: 4 Jul 2004, 12:10
Post
by Lukazz » 9 Oct 2005, 20:21
wow
circa: 27:30, tried the bounce style
culinko
38mins club
Posts: 1554 Joined: 29 Dec 2002, 19:17
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Post
by culinko » 9 Oct 2005, 22:17
Lukazz wrote: wow
circa: 27:30, tried the bounce style
i hav 27.18 without bounce style
sierra
39mins club
Posts: 2471 Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 22:51
Post
by sierra » 9 Oct 2005, 22:52
Serpents Tale - 59.59
[OMG] | [SpEF] | Apparently my TT was once 39:26:06
Dynamo
38mins club
Posts: 1982 Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 02:53
Team: HHIT
Location: The Heavens
Post
by Dynamo » 10 Oct 2005, 03:08
CuLiNo wrote: Lukazz wrote: wow
circa: 27:30, tried the bounce style
i hav 27.18 without bounce style
26,99 here
25 is possible
Total Time: 38:35,14
Tm
35mins club
Posts: 626 Joined: 13 Feb 2005, 15:08
Team: EF
Post
by Tm » 10 Oct 2005, 12:48
Expert System 57:66
Trix 47:13
Last edited by
Tm on 11 Oct 2005, 05:33, edited 1 time in total.
petsen
Meetsen
Posts: 2044 Joined: 29 May 2002, 01:27
Location: Aarhus S, Denmark or nearest DEM
Post
by petsen » 11 Oct 2005, 03:18
serp 1.01.95 fucked the ending so bad hehe
1,01,16, ok ending rest sucky
Proud Member Of RDK
Khempejjer
Kuski
Posts: 63 Joined: 15 Jul 2003, 21:15
Location: Bristol
Contact:
Post
by Khempejjer » 11 Oct 2005, 15:53
Tag 21.38
Tm
35mins club
Posts: 626 Joined: 13 Feb 2005, 15:08
Team: EF
Post
by Tm » 11 Oct 2005, 16:12
Trix 46:46
Jazka
38mins club
Posts: 544 Joined: 24 Apr 2005, 10:39
Location: Himanka, Finland
Post
by Jazka » 11 Oct 2005, 17:25
Pipe: 33.81 --> 33.54 pro time
TT: 38.59.35 (20.)
Avg TT: 39.56.193 (12.)
Freezen
Kuski
Posts: 104 Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 03:04
Location: Mikkeli, Finland
Post
by Freezen » 11 Oct 2005, 18:37
Uphill battle: 22.12 --> 21.81
Headbanger: 1.00.92 --> 56.90 --> 52.xx
Long haul: 34.48 --> 33.90
Tunnel terror: 1.06.72 --> 1.05.15 --> 1.04.45
Raven
Moporator
Posts: 2727 Joined: 7 Feb 2005, 15:28
Team: MiE
Location: Finland.
Contact:
Post
by Raven » 11 Oct 2005, 21:55
Twin peaks: 18.16
Seize the day
Kopaka
39mins club
Posts: 6612 Joined: 23 May 2002, 13:59
Team: LAME
Location: In a northern danish city beating YOUR record.
Contact:
Post
by Kopaka » 12 Oct 2005, 14:12
uhh I made the new serp style
But with slow begining and on laptop so fucked up the part after hang too, got 1:07,12
Raven
Moporator
Posts: 2727 Joined: 7 Feb 2005, 15:28
Team: MiE
Location: Finland.
Contact:
Post
by Raven » 12 Oct 2005, 15:27
twin: 18.15 :/
Seize the day
Tm
35mins club
Posts: 626 Joined: 13 Feb 2005, 15:08
Team: EF
Post
by Tm » 12 Oct 2005, 15:30
Bounce back 54:34 --> 53:51
culinko
38mins club
Posts: 1554 Joined: 29 Dec 2002, 19:17
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Post
by culinko » 12 Oct 2005, 16:37
Kopaka wrote: uhh I made the new serp style
But with slow begining and on laptop so fucked up the part after hang too, got 1:07,12
new style? hmm
twipley
Kuski
Posts: 756 Joined: 20 Nov 2004, 19:43
Post
by twipley » 12 Oct 2005, 16:58
Kopaka wrote: uhh I made the new serp style
But with slow begining and on laptop so fucked up the part after hang too, got 1:07,12
could, in your opinion, new style be any faster than older? in what conditions?
teajay
Donator duck
Posts: 10043 Joined: 3 Apr 2003, 17:53
Post
by teajay » 12 Oct 2005, 17:57
twipley wrote: Kopaka wrote: uhh I made the new serp style
But with slow begining and on laptop so fucked up the part after hang too, got 1:07,12
could, in your opinion, new style be any faster than older? in what conditions?
well I think, if you resample it like this:
Could, in your opinion, new style be faster than any older one?
Yes, it's certainly faster than some old styles. It's easier to get under a minute with this style than with the first style and even easier than the second major style that was used. It's not faster than the current WR-style though.
Raven
Moporator
Posts: 2727 Joined: 7 Feb 2005, 15:28
Team: MiE
Location: Finland.
Contact:
Post
by Raven » 12 Oct 2005, 20:50
twin: 18.05 WC time
Seize the day
culinko
38mins club
Posts: 1554 Joined: 29 Dec 2002, 19:17
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Post
by culinko » 12 Oct 2005, 21:53
maybe i should try that serp style too
petsen
Meetsen
Posts: 2044 Joined: 29 May 2002, 01:27
Location: Aarhus S, Denmark or nearest DEM
Post
by petsen » 12 Oct 2005, 22:38
serp 59,79
finally under 1 min now for some improvement
1st impro = 59.59
Last edited by
petsen on 13 Oct 2005, 13:09, edited 1 time in total.
Proud Member Of RDK
Tm
35mins club
Posts: 626 Joined: 13 Feb 2005, 15:08
Team: EF
Post
by Tm » 13 Oct 2005, 05:01
Trix 45:80
infected
Kuski
Posts: 468 Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 21:32
Team: LOS
Location: Lindome
Post
by infected » 13 Oct 2005, 11:36
got a computer wich can handle vsync off. so had to try how big diff elma is with it. so i started a new state for fun:
warm up: 14.09
twin peaks: 18.03
uphill: 20.72
hangman: 14.56
J-sim
39mins club
Posts: 835 Joined: 1 Sep 2002, 16:48
Post
by J-sim » 13 Oct 2005, 12:02
stANGer wrote: got a computer wich can handle vsync off. so had to try how big diff elma is with it. so i started a new state for fun:
warm up: 14.09
twin peaks: 18.03
uphill: 20.72
hangman: 14.56
with that rhetoric it seems like you made those times after playing around 10 minutes or so with your new computer. that would be sick! how long time did this actually take?
ps. i know it can really make a big difference to get a computer that can do vsync off properly. i could make lots of hard tricks suddenly that werent posible before. but it didnt help me make top10 times just like that
Lukazz
36mins club
Posts: 5241 Joined: 4 Jul 2004, 12:10
Post
by Lukazz » 13 Oct 2005, 12:02
WTF amazing hangman and warm up
culinko
38mins club
Posts: 1554 Joined: 29 Dec 2002, 19:17
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Post
by culinko » 13 Oct 2005, 12:30
really nice times
infected
Kuski
Posts: 468 Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 21:32
Team: LOS
Location: Lindome
Post
by infected » 13 Oct 2005, 12:31
J-sim wrote: stANGer wrote: got a computer wich can handle vsync off. so had to try how big diff elma is with it. so i started a new state for fun:
warm up: 14.09
twin peaks: 18.03
uphill: 20.72
hangman: 14.56
with that rhetoric it seems like you made those times after playing around 10 minutes or so with your new computer. that would be sick! how long time did this actually take?
ps. i know it can really make a big difference to get a computer that can do vsync off properly. i could make lots of hard tricks suddenly that werent posible before. but it didnt help me make top10 times just like that
hangman took around 5mins, only got 4 finishes on it. warm up took around 30mins, got 14.11 pretty ez tho. but imo it feels like a big difference with vsync off :s especielly on those levels
1 new time: tag 21.34
sierra
39mins club
Posts: 2471 Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 22:51
Post
by sierra » 13 Oct 2005, 14:05
stANGer wrote: got a computer wich can handle vsync off. so had to try how big diff elma is with it. so i started a new state for fun:
warm up: 14.09
twin peaks: 18.03
uphill: 20.72
hangman: 14.56
note the absence of a Flat Track time.... should Dariuz be worried ;o
incredible times infec
[OMG] | [SpEF] | Apparently my TT was once 39:26:06
milagros
Cheatless
Posts: 4560 Joined: 19 May 2002, 17:05
Post
by milagros » 13 Oct 2005, 14:10
sierra wrote: stANGer wrote: got a computer wich can handle vsync off. so had to try how big diff elma is with it. so i started a new state for fun:
warm up: 14.09
twin peaks: 18.03
uphill: 20.72
hangman: 14.56
note the absence of a Flat Track time.... should Dariuz be worried ;o
incredible times infec
flattrack is vsync on lev i think...
[carebox]
Kestas
Kuski
Posts: 576 Joined: 4 Mar 2005, 21:58
Location: Lithuania
Post
by Kestas » 13 Oct 2005, 15:19
Level 54, Apple Harvest:
01:49:56 Kestas
01:54:78 Kestas
what a level :S
Quinn
37mins club
Posts: 371 Joined: 18 Apr 2003, 17:20
Location: Queensland, Australia
Post
by Quinn » 13 Oct 2005, 18:18
13. Hill Legend: 16.81
47. Enigma: 19.89
TT=37.56.09 /Average TT=39.05.16 / Höylä Mission TT: 11.14.13/ X-Double Trouble WR /
Jarkko
Kuski
Posts: 352 Joined: 16 Nov 2003, 16:02
Post
by Jarkko » 13 Oct 2005, 18:36
42. enduro: 54:30
and again another 50+ WR
TT: 50:03:62
edit: 53:35
edit2: 52:72
TT: 43
Lukazz
36mins club
Posts: 5241 Joined: 4 Jul 2004, 12:10
Post
by Lukazz » 13 Oct 2005, 20:13
LOOOOL
apple harvest: 1:51
so sucky end and middle, easy 1:48
teajay
Donator duck
Posts: 10043 Joined: 3 Apr 2003, 17:53
Post
by teajay » 13 Oct 2005, 21:21
Played some Animal Farm to achieve a better top10, but I beat my best accidentally.
1:34,62 to 1:33,56
Khempejjer
Kuski
Posts: 63 Joined: 15 Jul 2003, 21:15
Location: Bristol
Contact:
Post
by Khempejjer » 13 Oct 2005, 22:34
I can prove that infected ran his times less than a hour...
I ran 21.38 on Tag, then he started to play that lev. He said he has never played it, and after 5 mins he got 21.42... And on the next day, after some minutes' playing, he has almost beaten my warm up time ...
After that, for the 4th finished run, he did 14.56 on hangman...
He has omg skillz...
*bow*
petsen
Meetsen
Posts: 2044 Joined: 29 May 2002, 01:27
Location: Aarhus S, Denmark or nearest DEM
Post
by petsen » 14 Oct 2005, 01:14
serp 59,10
Proud Member Of RDK
Quinn
37mins club
Posts: 371 Joined: 18 Apr 2003, 17:20
Location: Queensland, Australia
Post
by Quinn » 14 Oct 2005, 10:02
37. Jaws: 57.50
TT: 39.06.61
Edit: 57.31 with max sax end, could have been 56.8x
Edit2: hill legend 16.43
TT=37.56.09 /Average TT=39.05.16 / Höylä Mission TT: 11.14.13/ X-Double Trouble WR /
Jazka
38mins club
Posts: 544 Joined: 24 Apr 2005, 10:39
Location: Himanka, Finland
Post
by Jazka » 14 Oct 2005, 14:59
Haircut: 46.21 --> 45.21 just tried a bit...
TT: 38.59.35 (20.)
Avg TT: 39.56.193 (12.)
Quinn
37mins club
Posts: 371 Joined: 18 Apr 2003, 17:20
Location: Queensland, Australia
Post
by Quinn » 14 Oct 2005, 15:36
37. Jaws: 57.08
no bounce ofcoz
TT=37.56.09 /Average TT=39.05.16 / Höylä Mission TT: 11.14.13/ X-Double Trouble WR /
York
37mins club
Posts: 58 Joined: 4 Sep 2005, 11:23
Location: Russia
Post
by York » 14 Oct 2005, 18:27
29. HeadBanger 49:85
max sax ride
Not satisfied...
Int TT 38.23.xx | OLP TT 25:55:xx
LI TT 48:50:60 | ALP TT 21:57:xx
sierra
39mins club
Posts: 2471 Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 22:51
Post
by sierra » 14 Oct 2005, 19:24
hill legend - 18,43 waw good time
[OMG] | [SpEF] | Apparently my TT was once 39:26:06
Tm
35mins club
Posts: 626 Joined: 13 Feb 2005, 15:08
Team: EF
Post
by Tm » 14 Oct 2005, 19:32
Slalom 41:23
Ramzi
37mins club
Posts: 210 Joined: 20 Sep 2003, 10:28
Location: Olsztyn, Poland
Post
by Ramzi » 14 Oct 2005, 21:21
Framework - 39.66
Next World Class...
TT: 37.5x.xx|||| TeaM : [GF]
Raven
Moporator
Posts: 2727 Joined: 7 Feb 2005, 15:28
Team: MiE
Location: Finland.
Contact:
Post
by Raven » 14 Oct 2005, 22:40
flat trak: 16.20
Seize the day
twipley
Kuski
Posts: 756 Joined: 20 Nov 2004, 19:43
Post
by twipley » 15 Oct 2005, 00:25
spiral 46:48
I don't bother going further, but still good improvement from previous record
ead
Kuski
Posts: 236 Joined: 6 Nov 2004, 01:25
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Post
by ead » 15 Oct 2005, 00:30
serp 1:01,37
TT: 43:59,45 Riff Raff! Always good for a laugh!
Quinn
37mins club
Posts: 371 Joined: 18 Apr 2003, 17:20
Location: Queensland, Australia
Post
by Quinn » 15 Oct 2005, 11:41
37. Jaws: 56.97 no bounce
edit: 56.77
TT=37.56.09 /Average TT=39.05.16 / Höylä Mission TT: 11.14.13/ X-Double Trouble WR /
sierra
39mins club
Posts: 2471 Joined: 15 Apr 2004, 22:51
Post
by sierra » 15 Oct 2005, 15:13
Quinn wrote: 37. Jaws: 56.97 no bounce
edit: 56.77
dame! rec?
edit: first try of the day and 17.01 Hill Legend
[OMG] | [SpEF] | Apparently my TT was once 39:26:06
Tm
35mins club
Posts: 626 Joined: 13 Feb 2005, 15:08
Team: EF
Post
by Tm » 15 Oct 2005, 15:58
AH 1:42:25
Rasken
Kuski
Posts: 271 Joined: 15 Jan 2003, 19:06
Location: Near Hamar, Norway
Post
by Rasken » 15 Oct 2005, 16:04
Animal Farm: 1,27,05
Member of team LOS TT=40:59:56
ALP TT=26:21:34
ead
Kuski
Posts: 236 Joined: 6 Nov 2004, 01:25
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Post
by ead » 15 Oct 2005, 16:21
fruit in the den 1:14,xx -> 1:04,28
one beginner time gone
TT: 43:59,45 Riff Raff! Always good for a laugh!