Target List v1.3 BETA
Moderator: Moporators
Target List v1.3 BETA
http://www.moposite.com/misc_text_files/target_elma.txt
Ok, now, update I'm suggesting is:
WC Pro Good Ok Beg.
Flat Track 0:15,45 0:15,80 0:16,30 0:17,00 0:19,00
new:
Flat Track 0:15,30 0:15,80 0:17,00 0:17,50 0:19,15
Uphill 0:21,20 0:21,80 0:22,30 0:23,50 0:25,50
new:
Uphill 0:20,50 0:20,95 0:22,00 0:23,40 0:25,50
Hi-Flyer 0:34,25 0:35,30 0:36,50 0:38,00 0:42,00
new:
Hi-Flyer 0:33,90 0:35,00 0:36,50 0:38,00 0:42,00
Hill 0:16,70 0:18,00 0:20,00 0:22,00 0:24,00
new:
Hill 0:16,00 0:16,60 0:19,00 0:22,00 0:25,00
Serp 1:03,50 1:05,60 1:08,00 1:11,50 1:25,00
new:
Serp 0:57,90 1:02,00 1:08,00 1:11,50 1:25,00
As for now. Any other suggestions?
Ok, now, update I'm suggesting is:
WC Pro Good Ok Beg.
Flat Track 0:15,45 0:15,80 0:16,30 0:17,00 0:19,00
new:
Flat Track 0:15,30 0:15,80 0:17,00 0:17,50 0:19,15
Uphill 0:21,20 0:21,80 0:22,30 0:23,50 0:25,50
new:
Uphill 0:20,50 0:20,95 0:22,00 0:23,40 0:25,50
Hi-Flyer 0:34,25 0:35,30 0:36,50 0:38,00 0:42,00
new:
Hi-Flyer 0:33,90 0:35,00 0:36,50 0:38,00 0:42,00
Hill 0:16,70 0:18,00 0:20,00 0:22,00 0:24,00
new:
Hill 0:16,00 0:16,60 0:19,00 0:22,00 0:25,00
Serp 1:03,50 1:05,60 1:08,00 1:11,50 1:25,00
new:
Serp 0:57,90 1:02,00 1:08,00 1:11,50 1:25,00
As for now. Any other suggestions?
Nekit for president
- Boomer
- 39mins club
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: 10 Dec 2003, 16:31
- Team: LOS
- Location: Visby, Sweden
- Contact:
Seems to be quite good I think.
Team LOS website
<jaytea> uh milk was invented in 1966
-
<teh_mila> bah, fucked up nice labpro ride cause i almost fell of the chair:)
<jaytea> uh milk was invented in 1966
-
<teh_mila> bah, fucked up nice labpro ride cause i almost fell of the chair:)
To clarify my thoughts of 57,90 and 1,02,00: I consider playing jazka style under 57,90 to be as WC as a crappy finish with the bounce (eg. 57,50 run). I know you can't consider two styles normally, but I still think it's fair. And as for professional 1,02,00: here you can finish bounce style, jazka style, old style, and still keep PRO-status.
56,00, a bounce will be needed.
and as for 1,00.. either a crappy bounce run or jazka style..
56,00, a bounce will be needed.
and as for 1,00.. either a crappy bounce run or jazka style..
Nekit for president
If Hill is only 16.00 it will have to be lowered as soon as more ppl start playing the new style. 15.80 is at least better. Not hard at all if you put some time into it...
4th position in WC4 (DAMN YOU KARLIS!!!!) PWNED KARLIS IN WC5!!!!TT:39:2x:xx (you've got some playing to do Stini ) When it's all over the question is not who was right. The question is who's left.
You mean the targets you practically forced on peopleLuther wrote:I basically made the targets everyone use now ;F I guess I can suggest changes to my own old one then ey?zworqy wrote:I see, luther can suggest new targets but I can't
<Fihlvein> another case of zworqy-is-always-right closed i guess
<yoosef> zworqy doesnt suck at anything
<yoosef> zworqy doesnt suck at anything
-
- Kuski
- Posts: 86
- Joined: 3 Jul 2005, 18:46
- Location: Cardiff, Wales
No one has to except them, if you don't want to go along with them fine.zworqy wrote:You mean the targets you practically forced on peopleLuther wrote:I basically made the targets everyone use now ;F I guess I can suggest changes to my own old one then ey?zworqy wrote:I see, luther can suggest new targets but I can't
The thing is it's only fair that WC times are reserved for the very best times. If it was easy to get WC then what would the top players have to aim for? The way it is now is fine, n00bs like me have plenty to aim for getting the Beginner and ok times, while the top players still have to aim for WC on all levels (except John ). When a new, easier, style is invented that allows many players to achieve WC E.G. Jazka's Serps style then it makes sense that the times are adjusted to compensate. Otherwise you're effectivly saying achieving Jazkas style makes you as skilled as getting the bounce when that is simply not true. I do, however, like the way Luther has made it that a very fast time with Jazka style is enough for WC.
If Jazka style was harder then and adjustment might not need to be made.
New status:
WC Pro Good Ok Beg.
(definitely needed)
Flat Track 0:15,45 0:15,80 0:16,30 0:17,00 0:19,00
new:
Flat Track 0:15,30 0:15,80 0:17,00 0:17,50 0:19,15
(definitely needed)
Uphill 0:21,20 0:21,80 0:22,30 0:23,50 0:25,50
new:
Uphill 0:20,50 0:20,95 0:22,00 0:23,40 0:25,50
(just saw some minor improvements possible)
Hi-Flyer 0:34,25 0:35,30 0:36,50 0:38,00 0:42,00
new:
Hi-Flyer 0:33,90 0:35,00 0:36,50 0:38,00 0:42,00
(definitely needed)
Hill 0:16,70 0:18,00 0:20,00 0:22,00 0:24,00
new:
Hill 0:16,00 0:16,60 0:19,00 0:22,00 0:25,00
(definitely needed)
Serp 1:03,50 1:05,60 1:08,00 1:11,50 1:25,00
new:
Serp 0:56,50 1:01,00 1:08,00 1:11,50 1:25,00
(suggestion to zweq)
Hc 0:42,30 0:44,50 0:48,00 0:55,00 1:11,00
new:
Hc 0:41,50 0:43,20 0:47,00 0:54,00 1:09,00
(suggestion to milagros, jalli)
Curv 0:31,40 0:33,65 0:35,65 0:38,00 0:55,00
new:
Curv 0:30,90 0:32,40 0:35,50 0:38,00 0:55,00
And I don't agree with, you milagros, about Long Haul at all.
WC Pro Good Ok Beg.
(definitely needed)
Flat Track 0:15,45 0:15,80 0:16,30 0:17,00 0:19,00
new:
Flat Track 0:15,30 0:15,80 0:17,00 0:17,50 0:19,15
(definitely needed)
Uphill 0:21,20 0:21,80 0:22,30 0:23,50 0:25,50
new:
Uphill 0:20,50 0:20,95 0:22,00 0:23,40 0:25,50
(just saw some minor improvements possible)
Hi-Flyer 0:34,25 0:35,30 0:36,50 0:38,00 0:42,00
new:
Hi-Flyer 0:33,90 0:35,00 0:36,50 0:38,00 0:42,00
(definitely needed)
Hill 0:16,70 0:18,00 0:20,00 0:22,00 0:24,00
new:
Hill 0:16,00 0:16,60 0:19,00 0:22,00 0:25,00
(definitely needed)
Serp 1:03,50 1:05,60 1:08,00 1:11,50 1:25,00
new:
Serp 0:56,50 1:01,00 1:08,00 1:11,50 1:25,00
(suggestion to zweq)
Hc 0:42,30 0:44,50 0:48,00 0:55,00 1:11,00
new:
Hc 0:41,50 0:43,20 0:47,00 0:54,00 1:09,00
(suggestion to milagros, jalli)
Curv 0:31,40 0:33,65 0:35,65 0:38,00 0:55,00
new:
Curv 0:30,90 0:32,40 0:35,50 0:38,00 0:55,00
And I don't agree with, you milagros, about Long Haul at all.
Nekit for president
One mistake has been made: WC total time SHOULD be 38.09.32. Im correcting that soon
edit:
steep and haircut should have an * after them as well (and slalom)
edit:
steep and haircut should have an * after them as well (and slalom)
Last edited by Luther on 19 Apr 2006, 11:36, edited 1 time in total.
Nekit for president
This one should be TEH ONE: Target times in Elasto Mania v1.3.txt
(right click, save target as...)
(right click, save target as...)
eh? no... correct one is on moposite already nat?simon_labroue wrote:This one should be TEH ONE: Target times in Elasto Mania v1.3.txt
(right click, save target as...)
will fix later todayThere is a dot instead of a comma in O&U Pro time
Spiral is changed but not marked
Nekit for president
- Juski
- Kuski
- Posts: 2200
- Joined: 26 Dec 2003, 20:53
- Location: irc://irc.ircnet.org/ranks
he already fixed thoose things zworqy mentioned, so in fact the most correct one is not on moposite :DLuther wrote:eh? no... correct one is on moposite already nat?simon_labroue wrote:This one should be TEH ONE: Target times in Elasto Mania v1.3.txt
(right click, save target as...)
will fix later todayThere is a dot instead of a comma in O&U Pro time
Spiral is changed but not marked
No regrets
Are you LOST?
Are you LOST?
http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=89771Juski wrote:he already fixed thoose things zworqy mentioned
This is the one version I do use. No asterixes. Simplified, v1.3 Final
ive been wondering.... i still have this thing called "ElmaTimes" which is a program you use with your stats.txt and it tells you among other nice features what status your individual internal times have,... which basicly means that instead of counting it your self with this 1.3 target list it doest it for you...
the problem is though that its kinda outdated.. so wouldnt it be nice if someone with the proper programming skills could update this program to take in the new target list and then just add the new target times every time its updated...
at least in my world this seems logical and worth it
the problem is though that its kinda outdated.. so wouldnt it be nice if someone with the proper programming skills could update this program to take in the new target list and then just add the new target times every time its updated...
at least in my world this seems logical and worth it
Proud Member Of RDK
http://masbot.hoyler.net/files/targets_elmatiming.zip - targets for ElMa Timing by me
http://www.mxb.dk/upload/targets.txt - targets for StatsView by NightMar_JNR.
http://www.mxb.dk/upload/targets.txt - targets for StatsView by NightMar_JNR.
Don't know if it's *illegal* but I edited the *Stats.exe* program to these target times. Guess they are the newest.
http://www.moposite.com/misc_text_files ... a_v1.3.txt
Don't know who did this program
Here: http://www.mxb.dk/upload/STATS%20Target ... 0Final.EXE
Don't know why the /../target_elma_v1.3.txt has the Beginner TT = 1:04:10,00
When it should be 1:04:04,10
Maybe it's made on purpose.
The only thing i changed were the target times..i've got no idea about Worst Case Total Time
http://www.moposite.com/misc_text_files ... a_v1.3.txt
Don't know who did this program
Here: http://www.mxb.dk/upload/STATS%20Target ... 0Final.EXE
Don't know why the /../target_elma_v1.3.txt has the Beginner TT = 1:04:10,00
When it should be 1:04:04,10
Maybe it's made on purpose.
The only thing i changed were the target times..i've got no idea about Worst Case Total Time
Thorze wrote:I just wanted to make a cool topic like Juish have cool topics..
does anybody have a working link for this program?Xiphias wrote: Don't know who did this program
Here: http://www.mxb.dk/upload/STATS%20Target ... 0Final.EXE